• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

碘对比剂过敏反应的差异:美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统数据库分析。

Differences in Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media: Analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database.

机构信息

Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.

Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 May;11(5):1494-1502.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.027. Epub 2023 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.027
PMID:36736956
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A comparative hypersensitivity risk profile of frequently used iodinated contrast media (ICM) may be required for their safer use.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the association between hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) and specific ICM and characterize the spectrum of ICM-related HSRs.

METHODS

We performed a disproportionality analysis and proportionality test to assess the safety profile of ICM-related HSRs and compare the frequency ratio of specific HSRs in diverse age, sex, and country subgroups. We used reports downloaded from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System and data on the national use of individual ICM for this analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 11,343,365 adverse event reports were collected from the first quarter of 2013 to the first quarter of 2021, among which 5,432 cases were identified as ICM-induced HSRs. All of the studied ICMs were associated with overreporting frequencies of HSRs, in which iomeprol showed the highest reporting odds ratio (ROR) of 24.75 (95% CI, 19.61-31.24). Iopromide (ROR = 22.29; 95% CI, 20.18-24.62) and ioversol (ROR = 20.85; 95% CI, 18.54-23.44) were more likely to cause angioedema than other ICMs, particularly in the group aged 45 to 64 years. Iomeprol was associated with the largest disproportionality for severe cutaneous adverse reactions (ROR = 127.90; 95% CI, 103.32-159.88), whereas iodixanol exhibited maximal incidence when total use cases were considered. Regarding anaphylactic shock, iopamidol presented the highest disproportionality (ROR = 31.11; 95% CI, 27.15-35.65), especially in males or seniors aged greater than 65 years, whereas iopromide resulted in the maximum frequency in China and the United States.

CONCLUSIONS

Different ICMs exhibited diverse profiles regarding HSRs, which could be further affected by age, sex, or geographic area. Prospective studies are required for patient safety.

摘要

背景

为了更安全地使用经常使用的碘造影剂(ICM),可能需要比较其过敏风险概况。

目的

探索过敏反应(HSR)与特定 ICM 之间的关联,并描述 ICM 相关 HSR 的特征。

方法

我们进行了不成比例性分析和比例性检验,以评估 ICM 相关 HSR 的安全性概况,并比较不同年龄、性别和国家亚组中特定 HSR 的频率比。我们使用从美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统下载的报告和有关个别 ICM 全国使用的数据进行了此项分析。

结果

从 2013 年第一季度到 2021 年第一季度共收集了 11343365 份不良事件报告,其中 5432 例被确定为 ICM 引起的 HSR。所有研究的 ICM 均与 HSR 报告频率过高有关,其中碘普罗胺的报告优势比(ROR)最高,为 24.75(95%CI,19.61-31.24)。碘普罗胺(ROR=22.29;95%CI,20.18-24.62)和碘佛醇(ROR=20.85;95%CI,18.54-23.44)比其他 ICM 更易引起血管性水肿,尤其是 45 至 64 岁年龄组。碘普罗胺与严重皮肤不良反应的最大不成比例性相关(ROR=127.90;95%CI,103.32-159.88),而当考虑总使用病例时,碘海醇的发生率最高。关于过敏性休克,碘帕醇的不成比例性最高(ROR=31.11;95%CI,27.15-35.65),尤其是男性或 65 岁以上的老年人,而碘普罗胺在中国和美国的频率最高。

结论

不同的 ICM 在 HSR 方面表现出不同的特征,这可能会进一步受到年龄、性别或地理区域的影响。需要进行前瞻性研究以确保患者安全。

相似文献

1
Differences in Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media: Analysis of the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Database.碘对比剂过敏反应的差异:美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统数据库分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2023 May;11(5):1494-1502.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.01.027. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
2
Hypersensitivity Reactions Induced by Iodinated Contrast Media in Radiological Diagnosis: A Disproportionality Analysis Based on the FAERS Database.基于 FAERS 数据库的放射诊断用碘造影剂致超敏反应:一项比例失调分析。
Curr Med Imaging. 2024;20:e15734056306358. doi: 10.2174/0115734056306358240607115422.
3
Differences in Adverse Reactions Among Iodinated Contrast Media: Analysis of the KAERS Database.碘对比剂不良反应的差异:KAERS 数据库分析。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019 Sep-Oct;7(7):2205-2211. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.02.035. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
4
Hypersensitivity Reactions to Iodinated Contrast Media: A Multicenter Study of 196 081 Patients.碘对比剂过敏反应:196081 例患者的多中心研究。
Radiology. 2019 Oct;293(1):117-124. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190485. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
5
Hypersensitivity Reactions to Multiple Iodinated Contrast Media.对多种碘化造影剂的超敏反应
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Sep 23;11:575437. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.575437. eCollection 2020.
6
Immediate reactions to iodinated contrast media.碘化造影剂的即时反应。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Dec;119(6):553-557. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.08.014. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
7
Differences in hypersensitivity reactions and gadolinium deposition disease/symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure to gadolinium-based contrast agents: new insights based on global databases VigiBase, FAERS, and IQVIA-MIDAS.基于全球数据库 VigiBase、FAERS 和 IQVIA-MIDAS,探讨与钆类对比剂接触相关的超敏反应和钆沉积病/症状的差异:新的认识。
BMC Med. 2024 Aug 13;22(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03537-2.
8
Skin Test Reactivity Patterns in Patients Allergic to Iodinated Contrast Media: A Refined View.对碘造影剂过敏患者的皮肤试验反应模式:一种更精确的观点。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Mar;12(3):705-713.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.10.040. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
9
Contrast Agent Selection to Prevent Recurrent Severe Hypersensitivity Reaction to Iodinated Contrast Media Based on Nationwide Database.基于全国数据库的对比剂选择以预防碘对比剂再次发生严重过敏反应。
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2023;47(4):608-612. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001462. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
10
Clinical features and risk factors of iodinated contrast media (ICM)-induced anaphylaxis.碘造影剂(ICM)诱导过敏反应的临床特征和危险因素。
Eur J Radiol. 2023 Jul;164:110880. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110880. Epub 2023 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Hypersensitivity reactions to iodinated contrast media: potential mechanisms and clinical management.对碘化造影剂的超敏反应:潜在机制与临床管理
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 7;12:1582072. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1582072. eCollection 2025.
2
Oseltamivir-induced hepatotoxicity: A retrospective analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.奥司他韦引起的肝毒性:对美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的回顾性分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Feb 25;20(2):e0314970. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314970. eCollection 2025.
3
The real-world safety profile of empagliflozin: a disproportionality analysis based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.
恩格列净的真实世界安全性概况:基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的不成比例性分析。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2025 Feb 7;26(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s40360-025-00861-y.
4
Does the risk of hypersensitivity reactions to iopromide differ by sex, race, or across regions/countries? An analysis of 152 233 patients from 4 observational studies and the company's pharmacovigilance database.碘普罗胺的过敏反应风险是否因性别、种族或地区/国家而异?来自 4 项观察性研究和公司药物警戒数据库的 152333 例患者的分析。
Br J Radiol. 2024 Dec 1;97(1164):2004-2014. doi: 10.1093/bjr/tqae190.
5
Toxicity profiles of immune checkpoint inhibitors in nervous system cancer: a comprehensive disproportionality analysis using FDA adverse event reporting system.免疫检查点抑制剂在神经系统癌症中的毒性特征:利用 FDA 不良事件报告系统进行的全面比例失调分析。
Clin Exp Med. 2024 Sep 9;24(1):216. doi: 10.1007/s10238-024-01403-2.
6
Differences in hypersensitivity reactions and gadolinium deposition disease/symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure to gadolinium-based contrast agents: new insights based on global databases VigiBase, FAERS, and IQVIA-MIDAS.基于全球数据库 VigiBase、FAERS 和 IQVIA-MIDAS,探讨与钆类对比剂接触相关的超敏反应和钆沉积病/症状的差异:新的认识。
BMC Med. 2024 Aug 13;22(1):329. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03537-2.
7
Comparative analysis of adverse events associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors based on FDA's adverse event reporting system: a case control pharmacovigilance study.基于 FDA 的不良事件报告系统的 CDK4/6 抑制剂相关不良事件的对比分析:一项病例对照药物警戒研究。
BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2024 Aug 9;25(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s40360-024-00770-6.
8
Case Report: A Rare Case of Iodixanol-Induced Anaphylactic Shock in Cerebral Angiography.病例报告:一例碘克沙醇诱发的脑动脉造影过敏性休克罕见病例。
J Asthma Allergy. 2024 Apr 11;17:361-367. doi: 10.2147/JAA.S460263. eCollection 2024.
9
Exploration of adverse events associated with risdiplam use: Retrospective cases from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.探讨利司扑兰使用相关的不良事件:来自美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的回顾性病例。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 1;19(3):e0298609. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298609. eCollection 2024.
10
Real-World Data in Pharmacovigilance Database Provides a New Perspective for Understanding the Risk of Infection Associated with Antibacterial Drug Exposure.药物警戒数据库中的真实世界数据为理解抗菌药物暴露相关感染风险提供了新视角。
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Jun 27;12(7):1109. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12071109.