• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特朗普政府时期反科学行动的公平与环境正义评估。

An equity and environmental justice assessment of anti-science actions during the Trump administration.

机构信息

Center for Science and Democracy, Union of Concerned Scientists, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

J Public Health Policy. 2023 Mar;44(1):147-162. doi: 10.1057/s41271-022-00390-6. Epub 2023 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1057/s41271-022-00390-6
PMID:36737622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9896454/
Abstract

In the United States, science shapes federal health and safety protections, but political officials can and do politicize federal science and science-based safeguards. Many presidential administrations have politicized science, but under the administration of President Trump, these attacks on science-such as buried research, censored scientists, halted data collection-increased in number to unprecedented levels. Underserved communities bore the brunt of the harms. Such attacks disproportionately harm Black, Indigenous, low-income communities, and communities of color, all of whom have long been burdened by pollution exposure and other stressors. We analyze the effects on underserved communities of the Trump administration's anti-science environmental and public health policy actions and offer policy recommendations for current and future administrations. Our goal is to strengthen scientific integrity, prioritize health disparity research, and meaningfully engage affected communities in federal rulemaking.

摘要

在美国,科学影响着联邦的健康和安全保护,但政治官员确实可以将联邦科学和基于科学的保障措施政治化。许多总统政府都使科学政治化,但在特朗普总统的领导下,这些对科学的攻击——如隐藏研究、审查科学家、停止数据收集——的数量增加到了前所未有的水平。服务不足的社区首当其冲受到伤害。这些攻击不成比例地伤害了黑人和原住民、低收入社区以及有色人种社区,这些社区长期以来一直受到污染暴露和其他压力源的困扰。我们分析了特朗普政府反科学的环境和公共卫生政策行动对服务不足社区的影响,并为现任和未来政府提供了政策建议。我们的目标是加强科学完整性,优先考虑健康差异研究,并让受影响的社区在联邦法规制定中得到有意义的参与。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f36/10073056/7677f645e834/41271_2022_390_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f36/10073056/ac49fe31f6f4/41271_2022_390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f36/10073056/7677f645e834/41271_2022_390_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f36/10073056/ac49fe31f6f4/41271_2022_390_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5f36/10073056/7677f645e834/41271_2022_390_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
An equity and environmental justice assessment of anti-science actions during the Trump administration.特朗普政府时期反科学行动的公平与环境正义评估。
J Public Health Policy. 2023 Mar;44(1):147-162. doi: 10.1057/s41271-022-00390-6. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
2
Perceived losses of scientific integrity under the Trump administration: A survey of federal scientists.特朗普政府时期科学诚信的感知损失:对联邦科学家的调查。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 23;15(4):e0231929. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231929. eCollection 2020.
3
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
4
Politics v. science: How President Trump's war on science impacted public health and environmental regulation.政治与科学之争:特朗普总统如何发起针对科学的战争,影响公共卫生和环境监管。
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2022;188(1):65-80. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2021.11.006. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
5
Community Perspectives and Environmental Justice Issues in an Unincorporated Black Township.黑人乡镇的社区观点和环境公正问题。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 18;19(12):7490. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19127490.
6
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
7
How the Trump Administration's Pandemic Health Care Response Failed Racial Health Equity: Case Studies of Structural Racism and a Call for Equity Mindfulness in Federal Health Policy Making.特朗普政府的大流行病医疗保健应对措施如何未能实现种族健康公平:结构性种族主义案例研究以及在联邦卫生政策制定中呼吁公平意识。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2021 Oct 1;46(5):761-783. doi: 10.1215/03616878-9155963.
8
Harmony between Man and His Environment: Reviewing the Trump Administration's Changes to the National Environmental Policy Act in the Context of Environmental Racism.人与自然环境的和谐:从环境种族主义的角度审视特朗普政府对《国家环境政策法案》的修改。
J Law Med Ethics. 2022;50(1):76-84. doi: 10.1017/jme.2022.11.
9
Defending the scientific integrity of conservation-policy processes.维护保护政策制定过程中的科学诚信。
Conserv Biol. 2017 Oct;31(5):967-975. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12958. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
10
Pesticides and environmental injustice in the USA: root causes, current regulatory reinforcement and a path forward.美国的农药和环境不公平:根本原因、当前的监管加强以及前进的道路。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 19;22(1):708. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13057-4.

引用本文的文献

1
What motivates people to defend science: Evidence from the 2017 March for science.是什么激励人们捍卫科学:来自 2017 年科学大游行的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0290222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290222. eCollection 2023.
2
Pathways for diversifying and enhancing science advocacy.科学倡导多元化和增强的途径。
Sci Adv. 2023 May 19;9(20):eabq4899. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abq4899.