Dhruva Sanket S, Zhang Shumin, Chen Jiajing, Noseworthy Peter A, Doshi Amit A, Agboola Kolade M, Herrin Jeph, Jiang Guoqian, Yu Yue, Cafri Guy, Farr Kimberly Collison, Mbwana Mwanatumu S, Ross Joseph S, Coplan Paul M, Drozda Joseph P
Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco School of Medicine, 4150 Clement St, Building 203, 111C, San Francisco, CA, 94121, USA.
MedTech Epidemiology and Real-World Data Sciences, Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2023 Nov;66(8):1817-1825. doi: 10.1007/s10840-023-01496-x. Epub 2023 Feb 4.
The ThermoCool STSF catheter is used for ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia (VT) in routine clinical practice, although outcomes have not been studied and the catheter does not have Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for this indication. We used real-world health system data to evaluate its safety and effectiveness for this indication.
Among patients undergoing ischemic VT ablation with the ThermoCool STSF catheter pooled across two health systems (Mercy Health and Mayo Clinic), the primary safety composite outcome of death, thromboembolic events, and procedural complications within 7 days was compared to a performance goal of 15%, which is twice the expected proportion of the primary composite safety outcome based on prior studies. The exploratory effectiveness outcome of rehospitalization for VT or heart failure or repeat VT ablation at up to 1 year was averaged across health systems among patients treated with the ThermoCool STSF vs. ST catheters.
Seventy total patients received ablation for ischemic VT using the ThermoCool STSF catheter. The primary safety composite outcome occurred in 3/70 (4.3%; 90% CI, 1.2-10.7%) patients, meeting the pre-specified performance goal, p = 0.0045. At 1 year, the effectiveness outcome risk difference (STSF-ST) at Mercy was - 0.4% (90% CI: - 25.2%, 24.3%) and at Mayo Clinic was 12.6% (90% CI: - 13.0%, 38.4%); the average risk difference across both institutions was 5.8% (90% CI: - 12.0, 23.7).
The ThermoCool STSF catheter was safe and appeared effective for ischemic VT ablation, supporting continued use of the catheter and informing possible FDA label expansion. Health system data hold promise for real-world safety and effectiveness evaluation of cardiovascular devices.
ThermoCool STSF导管在常规临床实践中用于缺血性室性心动过速(VT)的消融,尽管尚未对其疗效进行研究,且该导管未获得美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)针对此适应症的批准。我们使用真实世界的医疗系统数据来评估其在此适应症上的安全性和有效性。
在两个医疗系统(仁慈健康医疗系统和梅奥诊所)中接受使用ThermoCool STSF导管进行缺血性VT消融的患者中,将7天内死亡、血栓栓塞事件和手术并发症的主要安全性综合结局与15%的性能目标进行比较,该目标是基于先前研究得出的主要综合安全结局预期比例的两倍。在使用ThermoCool STSF导管与ST导管治疗的患者中,对各医疗系统中长达1年的VT或心力衰竭再住院或重复VT消融的探索性有效性结局进行平均。
共有70例患者使用ThermoCool STSF导管进行了缺血性VT消融。3/70(4.3%;90%CI,1.2 - 10.7%)的患者出现了主要安全性综合结局,达到了预先设定的性能目标,p = 0.0045。在1年时,仁慈健康医疗系统的有效性结局风险差异(STSF - ST)为 - 0.4%(90%CI: - 25.2%,24.3%),梅奥诊所为12.6%(90%CI: - 13.0%,