Analysis of the influence of corneal properties and densitometry on applanation and rebound tonometry in primary open angle glaucoma.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of corneal densitometry on portable applanation (Perkins) and rebound (iCare ic100 and PRO) tonometry. A secondary goal was to assess if there was a relationship between various corneal properties and the severity of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Seventy-five eyes of 75 patients with primary open angle glaucoma were studied, divided by severity into 3 groups: 25 mild, 25 moderate and 25 advanced. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured 3 times in each participant with a Perkins applanation tonometer (PAT), a handheld version of the Goldman applanation tonometer (GAT), an iCare PRO and an iCare ic100. Mean values were then calculated. Corneal topography with the Pentacam HR (Oculus, Wetzlar, Germany) was also performed in all individuals.

RESULTS

Mean age and sex were comparable in all groups, as were densitometry values (P>0.05). The mean visual field defect (MD) was 2.85 (±1.23) dB in the mild glaucoma group, 8.26 (±1.90) dB in the moderate group and 15.66 (±3.46) dB in the advanced group. Three multivariate regression analyses were performed. The first and second calculations assessed the effect of IOP obtained with iCare ic100 and PAT as dependent variables with age, sex, CCT and mean keratometry (Km) within the glaucoma subgroups and the global sample. The third analysis was carried out to assess the relationship between corneal densitometry as the dependant variable and the aforementioned corneal parameters among the glaucoma groups. In the first multivariate regression analysis, a statistically significant correlation was found between ic100 rebound tonometry and CCT in the POAG global sample (coef. 0.117; IC [-0.21-(-0.01)]; P=0.025). No statistically significant correlation was found in the subgroup analyses. In the second multivariate analysis, no significant correlation was found between PAT and CCT, Km, age or sex (P>0.05). In the third analysis, densitometry was correlated with age in all glaucoma subgroups (P<0.001) and with CCT in the moderate glaucoma subgroup (coef. -0.037; IC [-0.67-(-0.01)]; P=0.021). Tonometry appeared to be minimally influenced by corneal densitometry, with a mild positive linear correlation seen (R=0.03). IOP values were similar with 3 of the tonometers: PAT 16.07 (±3.18) mmHg, PRO 16.27 (±3.42) mmHg and ic100 15.17 (±4.28) mmHg. There was, however, a significant underestimation of IOP with ic100 (-0.89mmHg) compared to PAT (P=0.007).

CONCLUSION

Corneal densitometry did not show significant differences between glaucoma severity groups. A positive correlation was seen with CCT and both corneal densitometry and age. No correlation was found with keratometry or severity of glaucoma. The influence of corneal densitometry on IOP measurements appears weak, with little clinical relevance identified.