• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内界膜撕除或翻转式内界膜瓣技术联合空气填充治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔。

Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling or Inverted Flap Technique Combined with Air Tamponade in the Treatment of Macular Holes in High Myopia.

机构信息

Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Science Key Laboratory, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Ophthalmic Res. 2023;66(1):569-578. doi: 10.1159/000529387. Epub 2023 Feb 3.

DOI:10.1159/000529387
PMID:36739868
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9972444/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to analyze the anatomical and visual outcomes after internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling or ILM flap insertion in highly myopic macular holes (HMMHs) and try to compare these two surgical techniques in large HMMHs.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, consecutive series study of patients with HMMH undergone vitrectomy from September 2016 to January 2021. We observed the outcomes of the HMMHs with ILM peeling and ILM flap insertion, respectively. Binary logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used to analyze the relationship between the minimum linear diameter (MLD) of macular hole and the initial closure rate in ILM peeling group. Finally, we compared the surgical outcomes between these two surgical techniques in large HMMHs.

RESULTS

There were 69 HMMHs using ILM peeling with a mean MLD of 423.55 ± 190.99 µm and 33 HMMHs using ILM flap insertion with a mean MLD of 600.79 ± 187.85 µm. The initial type I closure rate was 86.9% (60/69) and 81.8% (27/33), respectively. MLD had a good correlation with the initial closure rate in HMMHs with ILM peeling (p = 0.046). The large HMMH (MLD >461.5 μm obtained by ROC curve) was present in 26 eyes with each surgical technique, and there was no significant difference of baseline characteristics between them. In large HMMHs, the initial closure rate of ILM peeling was 73.0% and that of ILM flap insertion was 84.6% (p = 0.499). Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) improved significantly in both groups (p < 0.001), and the BCVA at last follow-up was better in closed large HMMHs with ILM peeling (p = 0.034).

CONCLUSION

In HMMHs with ILM peeling, the initial closure rate was decreased when MLD >461.5 μm. ILM peeling may obtain better functional prognosis in eyes with closed large macular holes compared with ILM flap insertion.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在分析高度近视黄斑裂孔(HMMH)中内界膜(ILM)剥除或 ILM 瓣插入后的解剖和视力结果,并尝试比较这两种手术技术在大 HMMH 中的效果。

方法

这是一项回顾性、连续系列研究,纳入了 2016 年 9 月至 2021 年 1 月接受玻璃体切除术治疗的 HMMH 患者。我们分别观察了 ILM 剥除和 ILM 瓣插入治疗 HMMH 的结果。二项逻辑回归和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线用于分析 ILM 剥除组中黄斑孔最小线性直径(MLD)与初始闭合率之间的关系。最后,我们比较了这两种手术技术在大 HMMH 中的手术效果。

结果

共有 69 例 HMMH 采用 ILM 剥除,平均 MLD 为 423.55 ± 190.99 µm,33 例 HMMH 采用 ILM 瓣插入,平均 MLD 为 600.79 ± 187.85 µm。初始 I 型闭合率分别为 86.9%(60/69)和 81.8%(27/33)。在 ILM 剥除的 HMMH 中,MLD 与初始闭合率具有良好的相关性(p = 0.046)。ROC 曲线得出的大 HMMH(MLD >461.5 µm)在 26 只眼中分别采用了这两种手术技术,且两组间的基线特征无显著差异。在大 HMMH 中,ILM 剥除的初始闭合率为 73.0%,ILM 瓣插入的初始闭合率为 84.6%(p = 0.499)。两组术后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)均显著提高(p < 0.001),且 ILM 剥除后闭合的大 HMMH 的 BCVA 在末次随访时更好(p = 0.034)。

结论

在 MLD >461.5 µm 的 HMMH 中,ILM 剥除的初始闭合率降低。与 ILM 瓣插入相比,ILM 剥除可能在闭合的大黄斑裂孔眼中获得更好的功能预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f92d/9972444/e3b0ff20d166/ore-2023-0066-0001-529387_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f92d/9972444/7913e69bff63/ore-2023-0066-0001-529387_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f92d/9972444/aaf2ca4d2c93/ore-2023-0066-0001-529387_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f92d/9972444/e3b0ff20d166/ore-2023-0066-0001-529387_F3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f92d/9972444/7913e69bff63/ore-2023-0066-0001-529387_F1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f92d/9972444/aaf2ca4d2c93/ore-2023-0066-0001-529387_F2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f92d/9972444/e3b0ff20d166/ore-2023-0066-0001-529387_F3.jpg

相似文献

1
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling or Inverted Flap Technique Combined with Air Tamponade in the Treatment of Macular Holes in High Myopia.内界膜撕除或翻转式内界膜瓣技术联合空气填充治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔。
Ophthalmic Res. 2023;66(1):569-578. doi: 10.1159/000529387. Epub 2023 Feb 3.
2
Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Macular Hole Retinal Detachment in High Myopia.倒置内界膜瓣与内界膜剥除术治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离的比较
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Sep;4(9):919-926. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.03.021. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
3
Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane flap versus pars plana vitrectomy with conventional internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular hole.玻切联合内界膜瓣翻转术与常规玻切联合内界膜剥除术治疗大孔性黄斑裂孔的对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 7;8(8):CD015031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015031.pub2.
4
EFFICACY OF THE INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE WITH VITRECTOMY FOR RETINAL DETACHMENT ASSOCIATED WITH MYOPIC MACULAR HOLES.玻璃体切除术联合倒转式内界膜瓣技术治疗近视性黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离的疗效
Retina. 2017 Mar;37(3):466-471. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001211.
5
Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique versus complete internal limiting membrane peeling in large macular hole surgery: a comparative study.内界膜瓣翻转技术与全内界膜撕除术治疗大孔性黄斑裂孔的对比研究。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 6;20(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1294-8.
6
Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique as a useful procedure for macular hole-associated retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes.内界膜翻转瓣技术作为高度近视眼黄斑裂孔相关视网膜脱离的一种有效手术方法。
Eye (Lond). 2017 Apr;31(4):545-550. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.263. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
7
Comparative study of conventional internal limiting membrane peeling versus temporal inverted internal limiting membrane flap for large macular hole treatment.大孔性黄斑病变治疗中常规内界膜剥除与颞侧反转内界膜瓣的对比研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Jan;71(1):188-194. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_685_22.
8
Inverted internal limiting membrane insertion versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia: one-year study.高度近视黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离中内界膜内反式插入与标准内界膜剥离的比较:一年研究。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;256(8):1387-1393. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4046-1. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
9
Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole-induced retinal detachment: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.玻璃体切除术联合内界膜剥除术与内界膜翻转瓣技术治疗黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离:文献系统评价与Meta分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0619-8.
10
[Functional and Anatomic Outcomes of Primary and Secondary Internal Limiting Membrane Transplantation in Large and Persistent Macular Holes].[原发性和继发性内界膜移植治疗大的持续性黄斑裂孔的功能和解剖学结果]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2018 Oct;235(10):1159-1164. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-121032. Epub 2017 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Enhances Macular Hole Closure Rates in Highly Myopic Eyes: A Case-Control Study.内界膜瓣提高高度近视眼黄斑裂孔闭合率:一项病例对照研究
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug 8;19:2615-2624. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S517929. eCollection 2025.
2
Critical analysis of macular hole repair techniques: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis comparing internal limiting membrane flap and internal limiting membrane peeling for any size of macular hole.黄斑裂孔修复技术的批判性分析:一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析,比较内界膜瓣和内界膜剥除术治疗任何大小黄斑裂孔的效果
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Apr 7;25(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04011-0.
3
THE INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE IS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR THE TREATMENT OF LARGE MACULAR HOLES SMALLER THAN 650 µ m.
对于小于650微米的大黄斑裂孔,不建议采用倒置内界膜瓣技术进行治疗。
Retina. 2024 Dec 1;44(12):2086-2090. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000004248. Epub 2024 Nov 12.