Poh Stanley S J, Tsai Andrew S H, Chou Hung-Da, Chee Miao Li, Wang Chung-Ting, Ting Daniel S W, Lai Chi-Chun, Lee Shu Yen
Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.
Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Academic Clinical Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug 8;19:2615-2624. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S517929. eCollection 2025.
To compare the anatomical and functional outcomes of macular hole (MH) surgery in high myopia (HM) versus non-HM eyes.
This is a retrospective case-control study of patients who underwent MH repair between 2018 and 2022. HM was defined by axial length (AL) ≥26 mm. MH size, macular curvature and foveoschisis were graded. Surgical technique was divided into internal limiting membrane (ILM) peel or flap. Post-operative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and anatomical outcomes including hole closure, restoration of outer retinal layers, presence of foveal gliosis or foveal detachment were assessed at post-operative one, three, six and twelve months.
Thirty-four HM eyes were matched 1:1 to 34 out of 201 non-HM eyes with using gender, age, MH size and concurrent phacoemulsification as covariates. Mean AL in the HM group was 28.46 ± 2.01 mm, ranging from 26.03 to 32.83 mm. MH size was 366±183 µm and 386±199 µm in HM and non-HM groups (p=0.667). BCVA and restoration of outer retinal layers were comparable between groups at all time points. Initial hole closure rate was comparable, with 29 (85.3%) in HM group vs 30 (88.2%) in non-HM eyes, p=0.720. One eye in the HM group re-opened 10 months post-operatively. Proportion of eyes with non-closure was higher in those who underwent ILM peel vs flap [7/34 (20.5%) vs 0/34 (0%), p=0.022]. Smaller MH was associated with better closure rate (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.99-1.00). AL and macular curvature were not associated with hole closure (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.72-1.15; OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99-1.02 respectively). Larger MH was associated with poorer final BCVA (β=0.010, 95% CI 0.007-0.014).
Anatomical success was comparable between HM and non-HM eyes. Higher surgical success was associated with smaller MH size and ILM flap, but not influenced by AL, macular curvature or foveoschisis.
比较高度近视(HM)与非高度近视眼中黄斑裂孔(MH)手术的解剖学和功能结果。
这是一项对2018年至2022年间接受MH修复的患者进行的回顾性病例对照研究。高度近视定义为眼轴长度(AL)≥26mm。对MH大小、黄斑曲率和黄斑劈裂进行分级。手术技术分为内界膜(ILM)剥除或内界膜瓣。在术后1个月、3个月、6个月和12个月评估术后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和解剖学结果,包括裂孔闭合、外层视网膜恢复、黄斑胶质增生或黄斑脱离情况。
34只高度近视眼与201只非高度近视眼中的34只按1:1配对,将性别、年龄、MH大小和同期白内障超声乳化手术作为协变量。高度近视组的平均眼轴长度为28.46±2.01mm,范围为26.03至32.83mm。高度近视组和非高度近视组的MH大小分别为366±183µm和386±199µm(p = 0.667)。两组在所有时间点的BCVA和外层视网膜恢复情况相当。初始裂孔闭合率相当,高度近视组为29只(85.3%),非高度近视组为30只(88.2%),p = 0.720。高度近视组有1只眼在术后10个月裂孔重新开放。接受ILM剥除术的患者中未闭合的眼睛比例高于接受ILM瓣手术的患者[7/34(20.5%)对0/34(0%),p = 0.022]。较小的MH与更高的闭合率相关(比值比0.99,95%可信区间0.99 - 1.00)。眼轴长度和黄斑曲率与裂孔闭合无关(比值比分别为0.91,95%可信区间0.72 - 1.15;1.01,95%可信区间0.99 - 1.02)。较大的MH与较差的最终BCVA相关(β = 0.010,95%可信区间0.007 - 0.014)。
高度近视和非高度近视眼中的解剖学成功率相当。更高的手术成功率与较小的MH大小和ILM瓣相关,但不受眼轴长度、黄斑曲率或黄斑劈裂的影响。