Suppr超能文献

[手部烧伤后瘢痕挛缩患儿家庭康复模式的探索]

[Exploration of family rehabilitation model for children with scar contracture after hand burns].

作者信息

Zhu C, He L, Zhang B W, Liang Y, Zhao H Y, Qi Z S, Liang M, Han J T, Hu D H, Liu J Q

机构信息

Department of Burns and Cutaneous Surgery, Burn Center of PLA, the First Affiliated Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an 710032, China.

Department of Plastic, Aesthetic & Maxillofacial Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2023 Jan 20;39(1):45-52. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220622-00253.

Abstract

To explore the family rehabilitation model for children with scar contracture after hand burns and observe its efficacy. A retrospective non-randomized controlled study was conducted. From March 2020 to March 2021, 30 children with scar contracture after deep partial-thickness to full-thickness burns of hands, who met the inclusion criteria, were hospitalized in the Burn Center of PLA of the First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University. According to the rehabilitation model adopted, 18 children (23 affected hands) were included in a group mainly treated by family rehabilitation (hereinafter referred to as family rehabilitation group), and 12 children (15 affected hands) were included in another group mainly treated by hospital rehabilitation (hereinafter referred to as hospital rehabilitation group). In the former group, there were 11 males and 7 females, aged (4.8±2.1) years, who began rehabilitation treatment (3.1±0.8) d after wound healing; in the latter group, there were 7 males and 5 females, aged (4.6±2.1) years, who began rehabilitation treatment (2.8±0.7) d after wound healing. The children in hospital rehabilitation group mainly received active and passive rehabilitation training in the hospital, supplemented by independent rehabilitation training after returning home; after 1-2 weeks of active and passive rehabilitation training in the hospital, the children in family rehabilitation group received active and passive rehabilitation training at home under the guidance of rehabilitation therapists through WeChat platform. Both groups of children were treated for 6 months. During the treatment, they wore pressure gloves and used hand flexion training belts and finger splitting braces. Before treatment and after 6 months of treatment, the modified Vancouver scar scale, the total active movement of the hand method, and Carroll quantitative test of upper extremity function were used to score/rate the scar of the affected hand (with the difference of scar score between before treatment and after treatment being calculated), the joint range of motion (with excellent and good ratio being calculated), and the function of the affected limb, respectively. Data were statistically analyzed with independent sample test, equivalence test, Fishers exact probability test, and Mann-Whitney test. The differences of scar scores of the affected hands of children in family rehabilitation group and hospital rehabilitation group between after 6 months of treatment and those before treatment were 3.0 (2.0, 7.0) and 3.0 (2.0, 8.0) respectively (with 95% confidence interval of 2.37-5.38 and 1.95-5.91). The 95% confidence interval of the difference between the differences of the two groups was -2.43-2.21, which was within the equivalent boundary value of -3-3 (<0.05). The excellent and good ratios of joint range of motion of the affected hand of children in family rehabilitation group and hospital rehabilitation group were 3/23 and 2/15 respectively before treatment, and 15/23 and 12/15 respectively after 6 months of treatment. The ratings of joint range of motion of the affected hand of children in family rehabilitation group and hospital rehabilitation group after 6 months of treatment were significantly higher than those before treatment (with values of 3.58 and 2.30, respectively, <0.05), but the ratings of joint range of motion of the affected hand between the two groups were similar before treatment and after 6 months of treatment (with values of 0.39 and 0.55, respectively, >0.05). The functional ratings of the affected limbs of children in family rehabilitation group and hospital rehabilitation group after 6 months of treatment were significantly higher than those before treatment (with values of 3.98 and 3.51, respectively, <0.05), but the functional ratings of the affected limbs between the two groups were similar before treatment and after 6 months of treatment (with values of 1.27 and 0.38, respectively, >0.05). The WeChat platform assisted rehabilitation treatment with mainly family rehabilitation, combined with hand flexion and extension brace can effectively reduce the scarring after children's hand burns, improve the joint range of motion of the affected hands, and promote the recovery of affected limb function. The effect is similar to that of hospital-based rehabilitation providing an optional rehabilitation, treatment method for children who cannot continue to receive treatment in hospital.

摘要

探讨手部烧伤后瘢痕挛缩患儿的家庭康复模式并观察其疗效。进行一项回顾性非随机对照研究。2020年3月至2021年3月,选取空军军医大学第一附属医院全军烧伤中心收治的30例符合纳入标准的手部深Ⅱ度至Ⅲ度烧伤后瘢痕挛缩患儿。根据采用的康复模式,将18例患儿(23只患手)纳入以家庭康复为主的治疗组(以下简称家庭康复组),12例患儿(15只患手)纳入以医院康复为主的治疗组(以下简称医院康复组)。家庭康复组中男11例,女7例,年龄(4.8±2.1)岁,伤后愈合(3.1±0.8)d开始康复治疗;医院康复组中男7例,女5例,年龄(4.6±2.1)岁,伤后愈合(2.8±0.7)d开始康复治疗。医院康复组患儿主要在医院接受主动和被动康复训练,回家后辅以自主康复训练;家庭康复组患儿在医院进行1~2周的主动和被动康复训练后,通过微信平台在康复治疗师指导下在家中接受主动和被动康复训练。两组患儿均治疗6个月。治疗期间,均佩戴压力手套,使用手部屈伸训练带及手指分指支具。治疗前及治疗6个月后,采用改良温哥华瘢痕量表、手部总主动活动度法及上肢功能Carroll定量测试分别对患手瘢痕(计算治疗前后瘢痕评分差值)、关节活动度(计算优良率)及患侧肢体功能进行评分/评估。数据采用独立样本t检验、等效性检验、Fisher确切概率检验及Mann-Whitney U检验进行统计学分析。家庭康复组和医院康复组患儿治疗6个月后患手瘢痕评分差值分别为3.0(2.0,7.0)和3.0(2.0,8.0)(95%置信区间分别为2.37~5.38和1.95~5.91)。两组差值差异的95%置信区间为-2.43~2.21,在等效界值-3~3范围内(P<0.05)。家庭康复组和医院康复组患儿治疗前患手关节活动度优良率分别为3/23和2/15,治疗6个月后分别为15/23和12/15。家庭康复组和医院康复组患儿治疗6个月后患手关节活动度评分均显著高于治疗前(P值分别为3.58和2.30,均<0.05),但两组治疗前及治疗6个月后患手关节活动度评分差异均无统计学意义(P值分别为0.39和0.55,均>0.05)。家庭康复组和医院康复组患儿治疗6个月后患侧肢体功能评分均显著高于治疗前(P值分别为3.98和3.51,均<0.05),但两组治疗前及治疗6个月后患侧肢体功能评分差异均无统计学意义(P值分别为1.27和0.38,均>0.05)。以家庭康复为主、微信平台辅助康复治疗,联合手部屈伸支具可有效减轻儿童手部烧伤后的瘢痕增生,改善患手关节活动度,促进患侧肢体功能恢复。效果与医院康复相似,为无法继续住院治疗的患儿提供了一种可选择的康复治疗方法。

相似文献

1
[Exploration of family rehabilitation model for children with scar contracture after hand burns].[手部烧伤后瘢痕挛缩患儿家庭康复模式的探索]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Yu Chuang Mian Xiu Fu Za Zhi. 2023 Jan 20;39(1):45-52. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501225-20220622-00253.

本文引用的文献

1
[How to treat palmar burn sequelae in children, about 49 cases].[如何治疗儿童手掌烧伤后遗症,约49例]
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2021 Aug;66(4):291-297. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2020.09.004. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
2
[Role and implementation experience of splints in pediatric burn rehabilitation].[夹板在小儿烧伤康复中的作用及应用经验]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020 Aug 20;36(8):751-753. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20190610-00267.
5
[Scar management strategy in children].[儿童瘢痕管理策略]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2019 Oct 20;35(10):712-714. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2019.10.002.
6
[Initiation, development, and achievements of burn rehabilitation therapy in China].[中国烧伤康复治疗的起步、发展与成就]
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 20;34(12):835-839. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1009-2587.2018.12.002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验