Suppr超能文献

使用针对米卡多毛孢的特异性 PCR 对非侵入性细针抽吸材料获得的颗粒进行检测比细胞学检查更准确。

Using a Madurella mycetomatis-specific PCR on grains obtained via non-invasive fine-needle aspirated material is more accurate than cytology.

机构信息

The Mycetoma Research Center, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan.

Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Mycoses. 2023 Jun;66(6):477-482. doi: 10.1111/myc.13572. Epub 2023 Feb 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Eumycetoma is a chronic subcutaneous inflammatory fungal infection most often caused by the fungus Madurella mycetomatis. Using a species-specific PCR on DNA directly isolated from grains is currently the most reliable method for species identification. However, so far, PCR has been performed on grains obtained through deep-seated surgical biopsies, which are invasive procedures. Grains can also be obtained via ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (US-FNA). Here we determined the diagnostic performance of species-specific PCRs performed on samples obtained through US-FNA.

METHODS

From 63 patients, US-FNA was performed to obtain eumycetoma grains; 34 patients also underwent a deep-seated biopsy. From the grains, DNA was isolated, and one pan-fungal and two M. mycetomatis-specific PCRs were performed. The sensitivity and specificity were determined.

RESULTS

Of the 63 patients who underwent US-FNA, 78% (49/63) had evidence of eumycetoma based on cytology and 93.7% (59/63) based on species-specific PCRs. In the 34 patients for whom surgical biopsies were performed as well, 31 patients had a positive PCR for M. mycetomatis when DNA was isolated from the deep-seated biopsy, and 30 had a positive PCR when DNA was obtained from the US-FNA material. This resulted in a 96.8% sensitivity, and 100% specificity with 97.1% diagnostic accuracy for PCR performed on US-FNA.

CONCLUSION

PCR performed on the US-FNA material has a similar sensitivity and specificity as PCR performed on deep-seated biopsies. Therefore, when using PCR, a deep-seated biopsy may not be necessary to obtain grains.

摘要

背景

外耳真菌病是一种慢性皮下炎症性真菌感染,通常由真菌马杜拉霉引起。目前,最可靠的物种鉴定方法是直接从病灶中提取 DNA 进行种特异性 PCR。然而,到目前为止,PCR 一直是在深部外科活检获得的病灶上进行的,这是一种有创的程序。病灶也可以通过超声引导下的细针抽吸(US-FNA)获得。在此,我们确定了通过 US-FNA 获得的样本进行种特异性 PCR 的诊断性能。

方法

从 63 例患者中进行 US-FNA 以获取外耳真菌病病灶;其中 34 例患者还进行了深部活检。从病灶中提取 DNA,进行 1 种通用真菌和 2 种马杜拉霉特异性 PCR。确定敏感性和特异性。

结果

在接受 US-FNA 的 63 例患者中,78%(49/63)根据细胞学检查有外耳真菌病证据,93.7%(59/63)根据种特异性 PCR 有证据。在同样进行外科活检的 34 例患者中,31 例从深部活检中提取 DNA 时马杜拉霉 PCR 阳性,30 例从 US-FNA 材料中提取 DNA 时 PCR 阳性。这导致 PCR 在 US-FNA 上的敏感性为 96.8%,特异性为 100%,诊断准确性为 97.1%。

结论

在 US-FNA 标本上进行 PCR 与在深部活检标本上进行 PCR 具有相似的敏感性和特异性。因此,在使用 PCR 时,可能不需要进行深部活检以获取病灶。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验