Vaideeswaran Sri Ranjani, Prathiba Dawson Gladys
Sonova Hearing India Private Limited, Mumbai, Maharastra 400070 India.
Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research, Deemed To Be University, Porur, Chennai, 600116 India.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):6462-6467. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02557-1. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
The primary goal of the study was to assess the progress achieved across different implant age groups (0-2 years, 2.1-4 years and 4.1-6 years) using a comprehensive test battery approach targeting areas such as Audition, Speech Perception, Speech Intelligibility and Speech-Language.This cross-sectional study evaluated the outcomes of 40 children who underwent cochlear implantation at Sri Ramachandra Medical Centre, Chennai. A battery of tests included aided audiogram, Categorical Auditory Performance, Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale; Picture speech identification test in Tamil; Speech Intelligibility Rating Scale and Communication Developmental Eclectic Approach to Language Learning (COMDEALL) were administered to evaluate their auditory, speech perception, speech intelligibility and speech and language skills, respectively. The results of the study suggested that children implanted between 0 and 2 years of age demonstrated better performance in all tasks including audition, speech perception and intelligibility as well as speech and language when compared to the other two older groups. Children implanted between 0 and 2 years reached target milestones early in life similar to their hearing peers. However, children between (2.1- 4 years) also performed well and results indicated that they could catch up with intensive training. The present study reestablished the findings that early implantation (0-2 years) facilitates optimal progress when compared to implantation at later ages within the age range of 0-6 years. It also facilitates parent counseling regarding the realistic expectations with reference to different ages of implantation.
该研究的主要目标是采用针对听觉、言语感知、言语可懂度和言语-语言等领域的综合测试组方法,评估不同植入年龄组(0至2岁、2.1至4岁和4.1至6岁)所取得的进展。这项横断面研究评估了在金奈的斯里兰卡拉马钱德拉医学中心接受人工耳蜗植入的40名儿童的结果。一系列测试包括助听听阈图、分类听觉表现、有意义听觉整合量表;泰米尔语图片言语识别测试;言语可懂度评级量表以及语言学习的沟通发展综合方法(COMDEALL),分别用于评估他们的听觉、言语感知、言语可懂度以及言语和语言技能。研究结果表明,与其他两个年龄较大的组相比,0至2岁植入人工耳蜗的儿童在所有任务中表现更好,包括听觉、言语感知和可懂度以及言语和语言方面。0至2岁植入人工耳蜗的儿童在生命早期就达到了与听力正常的同龄人相似的目标里程碑。然而,2.1至4岁的儿童表现也不错,结果表明他们通过强化训练能够赶上。本研究再次证实了以下发现:与0至6岁年龄段较晚植入相比,早期植入(0至2岁)有助于实现最佳进展。它还便于就不同植入年龄的现实期望对家长进行咨询。