Rana Amit Kumar, Kumar Shivesh, Kumar Amit, Khan Mubarak Muhamed, Parab Sapna Ramakrishna, Upadhyay Deepak
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head Neck Surgery, SRMS Institute of Medical Sciences, Bareilly, India.
Department of ENT, Career Institute of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Lucknow, India.
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):4069-4076. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02819-y. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
Ossicular discontinuity is one of the most common causes of conductive hearing loss. Ossicular chain reconstruction improves conductive hearing loss. With no additional cost, cartilage ossiculoplasty is easy to perform, and also the cartilage is well tolerated being an autograft. In this study we compared the audiological outcome in ossiculoplasty done by cartilage umbrella, cartilage boomerang and alloplastic TORP. 75 patients of age group 10-50 years clinically diagnosed with chronic otitis media with conductive hearing loss and an air bone gap (ABG) of at least 20 dB posted for surgery were included. Ossiculoplasty was done in three groups with autologous cartilage boomerang, cartilage umbrella and alloplastic TORP. In mucosal disease hearing gain was better in umbrella technique (17.66 ± 1.1) dB than Boomerang (16.9 ± 0.8) dB and TORP (10.68 ± 0.9) dB. ABG closure was higher in Boomerang and TORP. Hearing improvement in patients with squamosal disease managed by canal wall up surgery was 25.01 ± 1.1 dB, 27.73 ± 3.1 dB and 20.12 ± 1.8 dB in Boomerang, Umbrella and TORP group respectively showing that umbrella method gave maximum improvement. ABG closure was better in TORP group. In canal wall down surgery patient's maximum improvement was seen in Boomerang (29.51 ± 0.9) dB followed by Umbrella (26.67 ± 1.2) dB and TORP (25.27 ± 0.8) dB group. ABG closure was higher in Boomerang group. Cartilage ossiculoplasty is a reliable and effective method of ossicular chain reconstruction for both mucosal and squamosal disease. Cartilage ossiculoplasty has the added advantage of reduced chances of prosthesis extrusion as compared to TORP.
听骨链中断是传导性听力损失最常见的原因之一。听骨链重建可改善传导性听力损失。软骨听骨成形术操作简便,无需额外费用,且作为自体移植,软骨耐受性良好。在本研究中,我们比较了使用软骨伞、软骨回旋镖和人工全听骨赝复物(TORP)进行听骨成形术的听力学结果。纳入了75例年龄在10至50岁之间、临床诊断为慢性中耳炎伴传导性听力损失且气骨导间距(ABG)至少为20 dB并计划进行手术的患者。听骨成形术分为三组,分别采用自体软骨回旋镖、软骨伞和人工全听骨赝复物。在黏膜疾病中,伞状技术的听力增益(17.66±1.1)dB优于回旋镖技术(16.9±0.8)dB和人工全听骨赝复物技术(10.68±0.9)dB。回旋镖技术和人工全听骨赝复物技术的ABG闭合率更高。在经上鼓室开放手术治疗的鳞状疾病患者中,回旋镖组、伞状组和人工全听骨赝复物组的听力改善分别为25.01±1.1 dB、27.73±3.1 dB和20.12±1.8 dB,表明伞状方法改善效果最佳。人工全听骨赝复物组的ABG闭合情况更好。在经下鼓室开放手术的患者中,回旋镖组(29.51±0.9)dB的改善最大,其次是伞状组(26.67±1.2)dB和人工全听骨赝复物组(25.27±0.8)dB。回旋镖组的ABG闭合率更高。软骨听骨成形术是一种用于黏膜疾病和鳞状疾病的可靠且有效的听骨链重建方法。与人工全听骨赝复物相比,软骨听骨成形术还具有假体脱出几率降低的优势。