Rushton Clare, Kelly Peter J, Raftery Dayle, Beck Alison, Larance Briony
School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2023 May;42(4):960-977. doi: 10.1111/dar.13607. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
Family members affected by another's substance use disorder experience physical health problems, breakdowns in relationships and reduced psychological wellbeing. This review examines the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for improving the wellbeing of family members.
A systematic review of randomised-controlled trials (RCT), non-RCTs and pre-post studies examining group or individual interventions for affected families. Five databases were searched (PubMed, PsycINFO, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane Library). Outcomes included psychological functioning, quality of life, physical health and substance use, family functioning and coping. Outcomes were analysed by study design and mode of delivery (individual or group). Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tools (RoB2, ROBINS-I). The review followed PRISMA reporting guidelines and was prospectively registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42020200260).
Nineteen studies were included (k = 10 included in meta-analyses). In k = 3 RCTs, individually administered interventions significantly reduced depression (standardised mean difference [SMD] 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.21, 0.79) and distress (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.03, 0.54). In k = 2 pre-post studies, individual interventions improved family functioning (d = 0.51, 95% CI 0.28, 0.73) and coping (d = 0.43, 95% CI 0.24, 0.61). In k = 3 non-RCTs and k = 2 pre-post designs group interventions significantly reduced depression (d = 0.50, 95% CI 0.17, 0.82) and distress (d = 0.44, 95% CI 0.13, 0.75), and improved coping (d = 0.81, 95% CI 0.29, 1.33).
This review summarises the contemporary literature evaluating interventions for affected families, with both individual and group interventions demonstrating favourable outcomes. However, small sample sizes and methodologically weak-quality studies limit conclusions.
受他人物质使用障碍影响的家庭成员会出现身体健康问题、人际关系破裂和心理健康状况下降的情况。本综述探讨了心理社会干预措施对改善家庭成员幸福感的有效性。
对随机对照试验(RCT)、非随机对照试验和前后对照研究进行系统综述,这些研究考察了针对受影响家庭的团体或个体干预措施。检索了五个数据库(PubMed、PsycINFO、Medline、Web of Science、Cochrane图书馆)。结果包括心理功能、生活质量、身体健康和物质使用情况、家庭功能及应对方式。根据研究设计和实施方式(个体或团体)对结果进行分析。使用Cochrane工具(RoB2、ROBINS-I)评估偏倚风险。本综述遵循PRISMA报告指南,并在PROSPERO数据库(CRD42020200260)中进行了前瞻性注册。
纳入了19项研究(其中10项纳入了荟萃分析)。在3项随机对照试验中,个体实施的干预措施显著降低了抑郁水平(标准化均数差[SMD]0.50,95%置信区间[CI]0.21,0.79)和痛苦程度(SMD 0.28,95%CI 0.03,0.54)。在2项前后对照研究中,个体干预改善了家庭功能(d = 0.51,95%CI 0.28,0.73)和应对方式(d = 0.43,95%CI 0.24,0.61)。在3项非随机对照试验和2项前后对照设计中,团体干预显著降低了抑郁水平(d = 0.50,95%CI 0.17,0.82)和痛苦程度(d = 0.44,95%CI 0.13,0.75),并改善了应对方式(d = 0.81,95%CI 0.29,1.33)。
本综述总结了评估针对受影响家庭干预措施的当代文献,个体和团体干预均显示出良好的效果。然而,样本量小和方法学质量薄弱的研究限制了研究结论。