Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and of Morphological and Functional Images, Section of Radiological Sciences, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Department of Imaging, Interventional Radiology Unit, University Hospital "G. Martino", Messina, Italy.
Br J Radiol. 2023 Apr 1;96(1145):20221061. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20221061. Epub 2023 Mar 3.
The aim of our study is to compare the incidence of veno-venous shunts in male varicocele and evaluate the possibility to exclude them with manual compression or/and scrotal ligation in order to carry out the procedure of retrograde sclero-embolization.
In our retrospective study, all patients undergone retrograde sclerotherapy for varicocele in our Interventional Radiology Unit in the last four years were evaluated. Collaterals toward other venous shunts were identified and how many and which patients would be able to complete the procedure safely were considered.
Of the 91 patients, as many as 22 ( 24.17%) patients presented anatomical variants, consisting on shunting into left iliac vein (9 [9.89%]), lumbar left veins (3 [3.29%]), right iliac vein (1 [1.09%]), both iliac veins (1 [1.09%]), left femoral vein (1 [1.09%]) or a more proximal portion of the ISV itself without shunting (3 [3.29%]). Patients with duplication could benefit from a more distal injection in order to prevent back-flow; of the 19 left, nine successfully underwent sclerotherapy with manual compression or/and scrotal ligation, whereas in 10 flow through the collaterals could not be interrupted and patients were demanded for surgery.
Many patients with abnormal communications between the internal spermatic vein and the iliac veins (that is, shunts towards the iliac veins) may as well undergo retrograde sclerotherapy safely if compression/ligation is applied.
No large previous study highlighted the impact of veno-venous shunts in technical feasibility of retrograde sclerotherapy of varicocele.
本研究旨在比较男性精索静脉曲张中静脉-静脉分流的发生率,并评估通过手动压迫或/和阴囊结扎来排除这些分流的可能性,以便进行逆行硬化栓塞术。
在我们的回顾性研究中,评估了过去四年中在我们介入放射科接受逆行硬化治疗的所有精索静脉曲张患者。确定了向其他静脉分流的侧支,并考虑了有多少患者能够安全完成该程序。
在 91 名患者中,多达 22 名(24.17%)患者存在解剖变异,包括分流至左侧髂静脉(9 例[9.89%])、左侧腰静脉(3 例[3.29%])、右侧髂静脉(1 例[1.09%])、双侧髂静脉(1 例[1.09%])、左侧股静脉(1 例[1.09%])或 ISV 本身更靠近近端的部分而无分流(3 例[3.29%])。有静脉重复畸形的患者可以受益于更远端的注射,以防止回流;19 例左侧患者中,有 9 例成功地通过手动压迫或/和阴囊结扎进行了硬化治疗,而在 10 例中,侧支的血流无法阻断,患者需要手术。
如果应用压迫/结扎,许多存在精索内静脉与髂静脉之间异常交通(即,向髂静脉分流)的患者也可以安全地进行逆行硬化治疗。
以前没有大型研究强调静脉-静脉分流对逆行硬化治疗精索静脉曲张技术可行性的影响。