College of Health Sciences and Professions, Ohio University, Athens, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Scand J Pain. 2023 Feb 7;23(3):464-475. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2022-0107. Print 2023 Jul 26.
Awareness (being present), acceptance, and engagement (committed action) are three dimensions of psychological flexibility. Understanding these in the context of chronic pain may identify treatment targets to help refine individual treatment. Our objective was to test the predictive capacity of three dimensions within the psychological flexibility model on the longitudinal trajectory of pain interference.
Patients receiving pain psychology treatment at a pain management center participated in this pragmatic clinical longitudinal study (n=86 with at least three assessments; Mean age=51 years; Gender=60 females, 26 males). Measures included the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ-SF); Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8); Psychological Inflexibility in Pain Scale (PIPS-12); and Committed Action Questionnaire (CAQ-8). The dependent variable was the Patient Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference (PI). We used latent growth modelling to analyze scores assessed within 180 days of patient care.
Psychological inflexibility (PIPS-12) and pain acceptance (CPAQ-8) measured at baseline predicted PI outcomes (n=86). PIPS-12 showed a direct relationship with pain interference (PI), where higher PIPS-12 scores predicted significantly higher PI mean scores on average across the study period (=0.422, r=0.382) but also predicted significantly greater decreases in PI across time (=-0.489, r=0.123). Higher CPAQ-8 scores predicted significantly lower PI mean scores on average across the study period (=-0.478, r=0.453) but also significantly smaller decreases in PI across time (=0.495, r=0.076). Awareness (FFMQ-SF) and engagement (CAQ-8) were not predictive of PI outcomes.
Patients who entered pain psychology treatment with lower pain acceptance and higher psychological inflexibility showed the largest reductions in pain interference across time. These results contribute towards a novel prognostic understanding of the predictive roles of an enhancing dimension and limiting dimension of psychological flexibility.
意识(存在)、接受和投入(承诺的行动)是心理灵活性的三个维度。在慢性疼痛的背景下理解这些维度,可以确定治疗目标,帮助完善个体治疗。我们的目的是检验心理灵活性模型中的三个维度对疼痛干扰的纵向轨迹的预测能力。
在疼痛管理中心接受疼痛心理治疗的患者参与了这项实用的临床纵向研究(至少有 3 次评估的患者 n=86;平均年龄=51 岁;性别=60 名女性,26 名男性)。测量包括五因素正念问卷(FFMQ-SF);慢性疼痛接受问卷(CPAQ-8);疼痛心理灵活性量表(PIPS-12);和承诺行动问卷(CAQ-8)。因变量是患者报告的结果信息系统(PROMIS)疼痛干扰(PI)。我们使用潜在增长模型分析患者护理后 180 天内评估的分数。
基线时测量的心理不灵活性(PIPS-12)和疼痛接受度(CPAQ-8)预测了 PI 结果(n=86)。PIPS-12 与疼痛干扰(PI)呈直接关系,其中较高的 PIPS-12 分数平均预测整个研究期间 PI 平均分数显著升高(=0.422,r=0.382),但也预测 PI 随时间的显著降低(=-0.489,r=0.123)。较高的 CPAQ-8 分数预测了整个研究期间 PI 平均分数的显著降低(=-0.478,r=0.453),但也预测了 PI 随时间的显著降低(=0.495,r=0.076)。意识(FFMQ-SF)和投入(CAQ-8)对 PI 结果没有预测作用。
进入疼痛心理治疗时疼痛接受度较低和心理不灵活性较高的患者,在整个时间内疼痛干扰的降低幅度最大。这些结果有助于对心理灵活性的增强维度和限制维度的预测作用进行新颖的预后理解。