• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

跨专业干预措施以减少糖尿病黑人个体的急诊就诊次数。

Interprofessional Intervention to Reduce Emergency Department Visits in Black Individuals with Diabetes.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Psychiatry, and Ophthalmology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Popul Health Manag. 2023 Feb;26(1):46-52. doi: 10.1089/pop.2022.0216. Epub 2023 Feb 6.

DOI:10.1089/pop.2022.0216
PMID:36745390
Abstract

Black individuals with diabetes have high rates of emergency department (ED) use. This randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy of Diabetes Interprofessional Team to Enhance Adherence to Medical Care (DM I-TEAM) versus Usual Medical Care (UMC) to reduce number of return ED visits/hospitalizations over 12 months in 200 Black individuals with diabetes after an ED visit. DM I-TEAM consisted of community health worker-delivered diabetes education and behavior activation, telehealth visits with a diabetes nurse educator and primary care physicians, and clinical pharmacist recommendations to reduce potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Secondary outcomes included glycemic control, PIMs use, diabetes self-management, diabetes self-efficacy, depression, and medical trust. Participants had a mean age of 64.9 years and 73.0% were women. The 2 treatment groups were similar in baseline characteristics. Sixty-eight (69.4%) DM I-TEAM participants and 69 (67.6%) UMC participants had at least 1 incident ED visit/hospitalization over 12 months. The adjusted incidence rate ratio for DM I-TEAM versus UMC was 1.11 (95% confidence interval 0.79-1.56;  = 0.54). DM I-TEAM participants attained significantly better diabetes self-management, diabetes self-efficacy, and institutional trust than UMC participants. There were no treatment group differences in hemoglobin A1c level nor PIMs use. Among Black individuals with diabetes, a novel culturally relevant intervention was no better than usual care at preventing return ED visits/hospitalizations over 1 year. Before reasonable clinical interventions such as DM I-TEAM can be effective, reducing system-level barriers to health, building community health care capacity, and designing interventions that better align with the everyday realities of patients' lives are necessary. clinicaltrials.gov NCT03393338.

摘要

黑人糖尿病患者急诊就诊率较高。本随机对照试验比较了糖尿病跨专业团队增强医疗照护依从性(DM I-TEAM)与常规医疗照护(UMC)在减少 200 名黑人糖尿病患者急诊就诊后 12 个月内急诊就诊/住院次数的效果。DM I-TEAM 由社区卫生工作者提供的糖尿病教育和行为激活、糖尿病护士教育者和初级保健医生的远程医疗访问以及临床药剂师减少潜在不适当药物(PIM)的建议组成。次要结局包括血糖控制、PIM 使用、糖尿病自我管理、糖尿病自我效能、抑郁和医疗信任。参与者的平均年龄为 64.9 岁,73.0%为女性。两组治疗在基线特征方面相似。在 12 个月内,68(69.4%)名 DM I-TEAM 参与者和 69(67.6%)名 UMC 参与者至少有 1 次急诊就诊/住院。DM I-TEAM 与 UMC 的调整发生率比为 1.11(95%置信区间 0.79-1.56; = 0.54)。DM I-TEAM 参与者的糖尿病自我管理、糖尿病自我效能和机构信任明显优于 UMC 参与者。两组在糖化血红蛋白水平或 PIM 使用方面无差异。在黑人糖尿病患者中,一种新颖的文化相关干预与常规护理在预防 1 年内再次急诊就诊/住院方面效果相同。在 DM I-TEAM 等合理的临床干预措施有效之前,有必要减少系统层面的健康障碍,建立社区医疗保健能力,并设计更符合患者日常生活实际的干预措施。clinicaltrials.gov NCT03393338。

相似文献

1
Interprofessional Intervention to Reduce Emergency Department Visits in Black Individuals with Diabetes.跨专业干预措施以减少糖尿病黑人个体的急诊就诊次数。
Popul Health Manag. 2023 Feb;26(1):46-52. doi: 10.1089/pop.2022.0216. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
2
A randomized clinical trial of a collaborative home-based diabetes intervention to reduce emergency department visits and hospitalizations in black individuals with diabetes.一项针对黑人糖尿病患者的基于家庭的协作式糖尿病干预措施的随机临床试验,旨在减少急诊就诊和住院治疗。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Aug;95:106069. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106069. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
3
Emergency Department Use in Black Individuals With Diabetes.糖尿病黑人患者的急诊科使用情况。
Diabetes Spectr. 2023 Fall;36(4):391-397. doi: 10.2337/ds22-0091. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
4
The effects of a nurse case manager and a community health worker team on diabetic control, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations among urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial.护士个案管理师与社区卫生工作者团队对城市非裔2型糖尿病患者血糖控制、急诊就诊及住院情况的影响:一项随机对照试验
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Oct 26;169(19):1788-94. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.338.
5
Association of Cumulative Multimorbidity, Glycemic Control, and Medication Use With Hypoglycemia-Related Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalizations Among Adults With Diabetes.累积多病共存、血糖控制和药物使用与成年糖尿病患者低血糖相关急诊就诊和住院的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1919099. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.19099.
6
Effect of a Coordinated Community and Chronic Care Model Team Intervention vs Usual Care on Systolic Blood Pressure in Patients With Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: The SUCCEED Randomized Clinical Trial.社区与慢性病护理模式协同团队干预与常规护理对中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者收缩压的影响:SUCCEED随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Feb 1;4(2):e2036227. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.36227.
7
A randomized controlled trial of the effects of nurse case manager and community health worker team interventions in urban African-Americans with type 2 diabetes.一项关于护士个案管理师和社区卫生工作者团队干预措施对城市非裔美国2型糖尿病患者影响的随机对照试验。
Control Clin Trials. 2004 Feb;25(1):53-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2003.10.010.
8
Use of the emergency department for less-urgent care among type 2 diabetics under a disease management program.在疾病管理计划下,2 型糖尿病患者在急诊科使用较少紧急护理。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2009 Dec 7;9:223. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-223.
9
OPEN ACCESS TO DIABETES CENTER FROM THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT REDUCES HOSPITALIZATIONS IN THE SUSEQUENT YEAR.从急诊科开放糖尿病中心可减少次年的住院治疗。
Endocr Pract. 2016 Oct;22(10):1161-1169. doi: 10.4158/E161254.OR.
10
Reducing Emergency Department Visits Among Patients With Diabetes by Embedding Clinical Pharmacists in the Primary Care Teams.通过在基层医疗团队中嵌入临床药师,减少糖尿病患者的急诊就诊次数。
Med Care. 2021 Apr 1;59(4):348-353. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001501.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of consumers' and healthcare professionals' trust in digital healthcare.对消费者和医疗保健专业人员对数字医疗保健信任度的系统评价。
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Feb 21;8(1):115. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01510-8.
2
Interprofessional collaboration between pharmacists and community health workers: a scoping review.药剂师与社区卫生工作者之间的跨专业协作:一项范围综述
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Jan 21;24(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02377-7.
3
Non-emergency department (ED) interventions to reduce ED utilization: a scoping review.
非急诊部门(ED)干预措施以减少 ED 利用:范围综述。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 12;24(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01028-4.
4
Emergency Department Use in Black Individuals With Diabetes.糖尿病黑人患者的急诊科使用情况。
Diabetes Spectr. 2023 Fall;36(4):391-397. doi: 10.2337/ds22-0091. Epub 2023 Aug 30.