Department of Basic Science, Touro University, Vallejo, CA 94592.
Department of Anthropology, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Feb 14;120(7):e2201421120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2201421120. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
It is axiomatic that knowledge of the diets of extinct hominin species is central to any understanding of their ecology and our evolution. The importance of diet in the paleontological realm has led to the employment of multiple approaches in its elucidation. Some of these have deep historical roots, while others are dependent upon more recent technical and methodological advances. Historically, studies of tooth size, shape, and structure have been the gold standard for reconstructing diet. They focus on species-level adaptations, and as such, they can set theoretical brackets for dietary capabilities within the context of specific evolutionary moments. Other methods (e.g., analyses of dental calculus, biogeochemistry, and dental microwear) have only been developed within the past few decades, but are now beginning to yield evidence of the actual foods consumed by individuals represented by fossil remains. Here we begin by looking at these more "direct" forms of evidence of diet before showing that, when used in conjunction with other techniques, these "multi-proxy" approaches can raise questions about traditional interpretations of early hominin diets and change the nature of paleobiological interpretations.
不言而喻,了解已灭绝人类物种的饮食情况对于理解它们的生态和我们的进化至关重要。饮食在古生物学领域的重要性导致了多种方法的应用来阐明它。其中一些方法有着深厚的历史渊源,而另一些方法则依赖于最近的技术和方法上的进步。从历史上看,研究牙齿的大小、形状和结构一直是重建饮食的黄金标准。它们侧重于物种水平的适应,因此可以在特定的进化时刻为特定的饮食能力设定理论范围。其他方法(例如牙垢分析、生物地球化学和牙齿微观磨损分析)仅在过去几十年中才得到发展,但现在开始为化石标本所代表的个体实际食用的食物提供证据。在这里,我们首先研究这些更“直接”的饮食证据,然后表明,当与其他技术结合使用时,这些“多指标”方法可以对传统的早期人类饮食解释提出质疑,并改变古生物学解释的性质。