Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI 53705, United States of America.
Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison , Madison, WI 53792, United States of America.
Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2023 Feb 14;9(2). doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/acb93f.
To evaluate the impact of CT number calibration and imaging parameter selection on dose calculation accuracy relative to the CT planning process in thoracic treatments for on-board helical CT imaging systems used in helical tomotherapy.Direct CT number calibrations were performed with appropriate protocols for each imaging system using an electron density phantom. Large volume and SBRT treatment plans were simulated and optimized for planning CT scans of an anthropomorphic thorax phantom and transferred to registered kVCT and MVCT scans of the phantom as appropriate. Relevant DVH metrics and dose-difference maps were used to evaluate and compare dose calculation accuracy relative to the planning CT based on a variation in imaging parameters applied for the on-board systems.For helical kVCT scans of the thorax phantom, median differences in DVH parameters for the large volume treatment plan were less than ±1% with dose to the target volume either over- or underestimated depending on the imaging parameters utilized for CT number calibration and thorax phantom acquisition. For the lung SBRT plan calculated on helical kVCT scans, median dose differences were up to -2.7% with a more noticeable dependence on parameter selection. For MVCT scans, median dose differences for the large volume plan were within +2% with dose to the target overestimated regardless of the imaging protocol.Accurate dose calculations (median errors of <±1%) using a thorax phantom simulating realistic patient geometry and scatter conditions can be achieved with images acquired with a helical kVCT system on a helical tomotherapy unit. This accuracy is considerably improved relative to that achieved with the MV-based approach. In a clinical setting, careful consideration should be made when selecting appropriate kVCT imaging parameters for this process as dose calculation accuracy was observed to vary with both parameter selection and treatment type.
为了评估 CT 号校准和成像参数选择对螺旋断层放疗中在线螺旋 CT 成像系统胸部治疗的剂量计算准确性的影响。使用电子密度体模,针对每个成像系统执行直接 CT 号校准,并使用适当的协议进行。对大体积和 SBRT 治疗计划进行模拟和优化,以适应计划 CT 扫描的人体胸腔体模,并将其适当地转移到注册的千伏 CT 和 MVCT 扫描上。使用相关的 DVH 指标和剂量差异图来评估和比较基于成像参数变化的相对于计划 CT 的剂量计算准确性,这些成像参数适用于在线系统。对于胸腔体模的螺旋 kVCT 扫描,大体积治疗计划的 DVH 参数中位数差异小于±1%,靶区剂量要么高估要么低估,这取决于用于 CT 号校准和胸腔体模采集的成像参数。对于在螺旋 kVCT 扫描上计算的肺部 SBRT 计划,中位数剂量差异最大可达-2.7%,并且对参数选择的依赖性更明显。对于 MVCT 扫描,大体积计划的中位数剂量差异在+2%以内,无论成像协议如何,靶区剂量都被高估。使用模拟真实患者几何形状和散射条件的胸腔体模可以实现准确的剂量计算(中位数误差小于±1%),这是在螺旋断层放疗单元上使用螺旋 kVCT 系统获得的图像。与基于 MV 的方法相比,这种准确性有了很大的提高。在临床环境中,在为这个过程选择适当的 kVCT 成像参数时应仔细考虑,因为观察到剂量计算准确性随参数选择和治疗类型而变化。