Woodford Curtis, Yartsev Slav, Van Dyk Jake
London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, 790 Commissioners Road East, London, Ontario N6A 4L6, Canada.
Phys Med Biol. 2007 Aug 7;52(15):N345-54. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/15/N04. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
This study aims to investigate the settings that provide optimum registration accuracy when registering megavoltage CT (MVCT) studies acquired on tomotherapy with planning kilovoltage CT (kVCT) studies of patients with lung cancer. For each experiment, the systematic difference between the actual and planned positions of the thorax phantom was determined by setting the phantom up at the planning isocenter, generating and registering an MVCT study. The phantom was translated by 5 or 10 mm, MVCT scanned, and registration was performed again. A root-mean-square equation that calculated the residual error of the registration based on the known shift and systematic difference was used to assess the accuracy of the registration process. The phantom study results for 18 combinations of different MVCT/kVCT registration options are presented and compared to clinical registration data from 17 lung cancer patients. MVCT studies acquired with coarse (6 mm), normal (4 mm) and fine (2 mm) slice spacings could all be registered with similar residual errors. No specific combination of resolution and fusion selection technique resulted in a lower residual error. A scan length of 6 cm with any slice spacing registered with the full image fusion selection technique and fine resolution will result in a low residual error most of the time. On average, large corrections made manually by clinicians to the automatic registration values are infrequent. Small manual corrections within the residual error averages of the registration process occur, but their impact on the average patient position is small. Registrations using the full image fusion selection technique and fine resolution of 6 cm MVCT scans with coarse slices have a low residual error, and this strategy can be clinically used for lung cancer patients treated on tomotherapy. Automatic registration values are accurate on average, and a quick verification on a sagittal MVCT slice should be enough to detect registration outliers.
本研究旨在探讨在将肺癌患者在断层放疗中获取的兆伏级CT(MVCT)研究与计划千伏级CT(kVCT)研究进行配准时,能提供最佳配准精度的设置。对于每个实验,通过将胸部体模设置在计划等中心、生成并配准一项MVCT研究,来确定体模实际位置与计划位置之间的系统差异。将体模平移5或10毫米,进行MVCT扫描,然后再次进行配准。使用基于已知移位和系统差异计算配准残余误差的均方根方程来评估配准过程的准确性。给出了18种不同MVCT/kVCT配准选项组合的体模研究结果,并与17例肺癌患者的临床配准数据进行了比较。以粗(6毫米)、正常(4毫米)和细(2毫米)层厚间距获取的MVCT研究都能以相似的残余误差进行配准。分辨率和融合选择技术的任何特定组合都不会导致更低的残余误差。采用全图像融合选择技术和精细分辨率,扫描长度为6厘米且层厚间距任意的情况下进行配准,多数时候会产生较低的残余误差。平均而言,临床医生很少对自动配准值进行大的手动校正。在配准过程的残余误差平均值范围内会出现小的手动校正,但它们对患者平均位置的影响较小。使用全图像融合选择技术和粗层厚6厘米MVCT扫描的精细分辨率进行配准,残余误差较低,该策略可临床应用于接受断层放疗的肺癌患者。自动配准值平均而言是准确的,在矢状面MVCT切片上进行快速验证应足以检测出配准异常值。