A survey of assessment practices among health professionals diagnosing females with autism.

BACKGROUND

Emerging research suggests there may be a distinct female autism phenotype, although females are still diagnosed at a much lower rate than males. To date, no research has examined the assessment practices of health professionals when assessing females for autism.

AIMS

This study aimed to identify the training received, level of confidence, and assessment practices specific to assessing females for autism.

METHODS AND PROCEDURE

An online survey was completed by 126 health professionals (34 paediatricians, 40 psychologists and 52 speech pathologists) working across Australia.

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

The majority of health professionals received no training that addressed gender differences when assessing for autism, even when controlling for number of years since they completed their studies. Most health professionals reported using similar assessment practices when assessing and diagnosing males and females for autism; only 18.2 % reported using female-specific assessment measures.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Suggestions for the lack of difference in assessment measures used across genders are discussed. Potential for including measures that may be more sensitive to the presentation of autism in females in health professional's assessment practices is identified. The high proportion of health professionals engaging in professional development following their clinical training highlights the importance of training opportunities to enhance practitioner understanding and confidence when undertaking assessments for autism in females.