Department of Chemistry, Milki High School, Milki, Malda, West Bengal, 732209, India.
Department of Physics, Dukhulal Nibaran Chandra College, Suti, West Bengal, 742201, India.
Comput Biol Med. 2023 Mar;154:106593. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106593. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
Herein we have made a comparative study of the efficiency of three different nanotubes viz. Carbon nanotube (CNT), boron nitride nanotube (BNNT) and silicon carbide nanotube (SiCNT) to deliver the cancerous drug, Azacitidine (AZD). The atomistic description of the encapsulation process of AZD in these nanotubes has been analyzed by evaluating parameters like adsorption energy, electrostatic potential map, reduced density gradient (RDG). Higher adsorption energy of AZD with BNNT (-0.66eV), SiCNT (-0.92eV) compared to CNT (-0.56eV) confirms stronger binding affinity of the drug for the former than the later. Charge density and electrostatic potential map suggest that charge separation involving BNNT and CNT is more prominent than SiCNT. Evaluation of different thermodynamic parameters like Gibbs free energy, enthalpy change revealed that the overall encapsulation process is spontaneous and exothermic in nature and much favorable with BNNT and SiCNT. Stabilizing interactions of the drug with BNNT and SiCNT has been confirmed from RDG analysis. ADMP molecular dynamics simulation supports that the encapsulation process of the drug within the NT at room temperature. These results open up unlimited opportunities for the applications of these NTs as a drug delivery system in the field of nanomedicine.
在此,我们对三种不同的纳米管(即碳纳米管(CNT)、氮化硼纳米管(BNNT)和碳化硅纳米管(SiCNT))的效率进行了比较研究,以输送抗癌药物阿扎胞苷(AZD)。通过评估吸附能、静电势图、简并密度梯度(RDG)等参数,分析了 AZD 在这些纳米管中的封装过程的原子描述。与 CNT(-0.56eV)相比,AZD 与 BNNT(-0.66eV)和 SiCNT(-0.92eV)的吸附能更高,这证实了药物与前两者的结合亲和力强于后者。电荷密度和静电势图表明,涉及 BNNT 和 CNT 的电荷分离比 SiCNT 更为明显。评估不同的热力学参数,如吉布斯自由能、焓变,揭示了整个封装过程是自发的和放热的,与 BNNT 和 SiCNT 更为有利。从 RDG 分析证实了药物与 BNNT 和 SiCNT 的稳定相互作用。ADMP 分子动力学模拟支持药物在室温下在 NT 内的封装过程。这些结果为这些 NT 作为纳米医学领域药物输送系统的应用开辟了无限的机会。