Theune William C, Trakhtenberg Ephraim F
Department of Neuroscience, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, 263 Farmington Ave., Farmington, CT, 06030, USA.
bioRxiv. 2023 Jan 24:2023.01.23.525216. doi: 10.1101/2023.01.23.525216.
Analysis of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) by scRNA-seq is emerging as a state-of-the-art method for studying RGC biology and subtypes, as well as for studying the mechanisms of neuroprotection and axon regeneration in the central nervous system (CNS). Rbpms has been established as a pan-RGC marker, and Spp1 has been established as an αRGC type marker. Here, we analyzed by scRNA-seq retinal microglia and macrophages, and found Rbpms+ and Spp1+ subpopulations of retinal microglia/macrophages, which pose a potential pitfall in scRNA-seq studies involving RGCs. We performed comparative analysis of cellular identity of the presumed RGC cells isolated in recent scRNA-seq studies, and found that Rbpms+ and Spp1+ microglia/macrophages confounded identification of RGCs. We also provide solutions for circumventing this potential pitfall in scRNA-seq studies, by including in RGC and αRGC selection criteria other pan-RGC and αRGC markers.
通过单细胞RNA测序(scRNA-seq)分析视网膜神经节细胞(RGCs)正在成为研究RGC生物学和亚型,以及研究中枢神经系统(CNS)神经保护和轴突再生机制的一种先进方法。Rbpms已被确立为一种全RGC标记物,而Spp1已被确立为一种αRGC类型标记物。在这里,我们通过scRNA-seq分析了视网膜小胶质细胞和巨噬细胞,发现了视网膜小胶质细胞/巨噬细胞的Rbpms+和Spp1+亚群,这在涉及RGCs的scRNA-seq研究中构成了一个潜在的陷阱。我们对近期scRNA-seq研究中分离出的假定RGC细胞的细胞身份进行了比较分析,发现Rbpms+和Spp1+小胶质细胞/巨噬细胞混淆了RGCs的识别。我们还提供了在scRNA-seq研究中规避这一潜在陷阱的解决方案,即在RGC和αRGC选择标准中纳入其他全RGC和αRGC标记物。