Sun Bin, Han Qing, Sui FengXu, Zhang AoBo, Liu Yang, Xia Peng, Wang JinCheng, Yang XiaoYu
Department of Orthopedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, No. 218 Ziqiang Street, 130041, Changchun, Jilin, China.
Heliyon. 2023 Jan 12;9(1):e12923. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e12923. eCollection 2023 Jan.
In anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), an interbody fusion device is an essential implant. An unsuitable interbody fusion device can cause postoperative complications, including subsidence and nonunion. We designed a customized intervertebral fusion device to reduce postoperative complications and validated it by finite element analysis. Herein, we built a non-homogeneous model of the C3-7 cervical spine. Three implant models (customized cage, commercial cage, and bone graft cage) were constructed and placed in the C45 cervical segment after ACDF surgery. The simulated range of motion (ROM), stress at the cage-bone interface, and stress on the cage and implants were compared under different conditions. The commercial cage showed maximum stress peaks at 40.3 MPa and 43.2 MPa in the inferior endplate of C4 and superior endplate of C5 under rotational conditions, higher compared to 29.7 MPa and 26.4 MPa, respectively, in the customized cage. The ROM was not significantly different between the three cages placed after ACDF. The stresses on the commercial cage were higher compared to the other two cages under all conditions. The bone graft in the customized cage was subject to higher stress than the commercial cage under all conditions, particularly lateral bending, wherein the maximum stress was 5.5 MPa. These results showed that a customized cage that better conformed to the vertebral anatomy was promising for reducing the risk of stress shielding and the occurrence of subsidence.
在颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)中,椎间融合器是一种重要的植入物。不合适的椎间融合器可能导致术后并发症,包括下沉和不愈合。我们设计了一种定制的椎间融合器以减少术后并发症,并通过有限元分析对其进行了验证。在此,我们构建了C3 - 7颈椎的非均质模型。构建了三种植入物模型(定制椎间融合器、商用椎间融合器和植骨椎间融合器),并在ACDF手术后置于C4 - 5颈椎节段。比较了不同条件下模拟的活动范围(ROM)、椎间融合器 - 骨界面的应力以及椎间融合器和植入物上的应力。商用椎间融合器在旋转条件下,C4下终板和C5上终板处的最大应力峰值分别为40.3MPa和43.2MPa,相比之下,定制椎间融合器分别为29.7MPa和26.4MPa。ACDF术后放置的三种椎间融合器之间的ROM没有显著差异。在所有条件下,商用椎间融合器上的应力均高于其他两种椎间融合器。在所有条件下,定制椎间融合器中的植骨承受的应力均高于商用椎间融合器,尤其是在侧弯时,其中最大应力为5.5MPa。这些结果表明,更符合椎体解剖结构的定制椎间融合器有望降低应力遮挡风险和下沉的发生率。