• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

GM CSF 联合碳青霉烯类药物治疗治疗困难性自发性细菌性腹膜炎优于碳青霉烯类药物单药治疗:一项随机对照试验。

Combination of GM CSF and carbapenem is superior to carbapenem monotherapy in difficult-to-treat spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Hepatology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Liver Int. 2023 Jun;43(6):1298-1306. doi: 10.1111/liv.15534. Epub 2023 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1111/liv.15534
PMID:36748109
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with cirrhosis and treatment non-responsive spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) have high mortality. We aimed to investigate whether GM-CSF can improve SBP response rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this open-label RCT, 131 cirrhosis patients with difficult-to-treat SBP (DTT SBP) were randomized to receive meropenem alone (1 g IV thrice daily for 5 days) (MERO Group, n = 66) or in combination with GM-CSF (1.5 mcg/Kg daily IV till resolution or till 5d) (MEROGM Group, n = 65). The primary end-point was SBP early-response (reduction in absolute neutrophil count (ANC) by >25% after 48 h). Secondary end-points included SBP resolution at day 5.

RESULTS

Patients in MEROGM group in comparison to MERO group had higher SBP early-response (60% vs. 31.8%; p = .001) and SBP resolution rates (55.4% vs. 24.2%; p = .0003). Patients in the combination arm also had better resolution of pneumonia {8/17 (47.05%) vs. 2/19 (10.5%), p = .02} and lower incidence of new-onset AKI (15.4% vs. 31.8%, p = .02), HE (18.5% vs. 34.8%, p = .04) and infections (21.5% vs. 37.9%, p = .05). In comparison to MERO group, 7-day survival was higher in MEROGM group (89.2% vs. 78.7%, p = .03), though the 28-day survival was comparable (78.4% vs. 71.2%; p = .66). None of the patients developed treatment-related severe adverse effects requiring discontinuation of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of GM-CSF to meropenem significantly improves response rates in DTT SBP patients within 48 h. Early use of GMCSF modulates host immune response, and enhances antibiotic response with higher SBP resolution. The use of GMCSF needs to be considered in combating difficult SBP in cirrhosis patients.

摘要

背景

肝硬化伴治疗无应答自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)患者死亡率较高。我们旨在研究 GM-CSF 是否能提高 SBP 应答率。

患者和方法

在这项开放标签 RCT 中,131 例肝硬化伴难治性 SBP(DTT SBP)患者被随机分为接受美罗培南单药治疗(1 g 静脉滴注,每日 3 次,连用 5 天)(MERO 组,n=66)或联合 GM-CSF 治疗(1.5 mcg/Kg 静脉滴注,直至缓解或连用 5 天)(MEROGM 组,n=65)。主要终点为 SBP 早期应答(48 小时后绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)下降>25%)。次要终点包括第 5 天 SBP 缓解。

结果

与 MERO 组相比,MEROGM 组 SBP 早期应答率(60%比 31.8%;p=0.001)和 SBP 缓解率(55.4%比 24.2%;p=0.0003)更高。联合治疗组的肺炎缓解率也更高(8/17 [47.05%]比 2/19 [10.5%],p=0.02),新发急性肾损伤(AKI)发生率更低(15.4%比 31.8%,p=0.02)、肝性脑病(HE)发生率更低(18.5%比 34.8%,p=0.04)和感染发生率更低(21.5%比 37.9%,p=0.05)。与 MERO 组相比,MEROGM 组 7 天生存率更高(89.2%比 78.7%,p=0.03),但 28 天生存率无差异(78.4%比 71.2%;p=0.66)。没有患者因治疗相关严重不良反应而停止治疗。

结论

在 DTT SBP 患者中,GM-CSF 联合美罗培南可显著提高 48 小时内的应答率。GMCSF 的早期使用可调节宿主免疫反应,增强抗生素反应,提高 SBP 缓解率。在肝硬化患者中,应考虑使用 GM-CSF 来治疗难治性 SBP。

相似文献

1
Combination of GM CSF and carbapenem is superior to carbapenem monotherapy in difficult-to-treat spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: A randomized controlled trial.GM CSF 联合碳青霉烯类药物治疗治疗困难性自发性细菌性腹膜炎优于碳青霉烯类药物单药治疗:一项随机对照试验。
Liver Int. 2023 Jun;43(6):1298-1306. doi: 10.1111/liv.15534. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
2
A randomized open label study of 'imipenem vs. cefepime' in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.一项关于“亚胺培南与头孢吡肟”治疗自发性细菌性腹膜炎的随机开放标签研究。
Liver Int. 2016 May;36(5):677-87. doi: 10.1111/liv.12985. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
3
Antibiotic resistance in healthcare-related and nosocomial spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.医疗相关及医院获得性自发性细菌性腹膜炎中的抗生素耐药性
Eur J Clin Invest. 2017 Jan;47(1):44-52. doi: 10.1111/eci.12701. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
4
The empirical antibiotic treatment of nosocomial spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: Results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial.医院获得性自发性细菌性腹膜炎的经验性抗生素治疗:一项随机对照临床试验的结果。
Hepatology. 2016 Apr;63(4):1299-309. doi: 10.1002/hep.27941. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
5
ASEPTIC: primary antibiotic prophylaxis using co-trimoxazole to prevent SpontanEous bacterial PeritoniTIs in Cirrhosis-study protocol for an interventional randomised controlled trial.无菌性:使用复方新诺明进行原发性抗生素预防,以预防肝硬化自发性细菌性腹膜炎-一项干预性随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2022 Sep 27;23(1):812. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06727-6.
6
Antibiotic treatment for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in people with decompensated liver cirrhosis: a network meta-analysis.失代偿期肝硬化患者自发性细菌性腹膜炎的抗生素治疗:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 16;9(9):CD013120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013120.pub2.
7
Are third-generation cephalosporins still the empirical antibiotic treatment of community-acquired spontaneous bacterial peritonitis? A systematic review and meta-analysis.第三代头孢菌素仍然是社区获得性自发性细菌性腹膜炎的经验性抗生素治疗方案吗?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;30(3):329-336. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001057.
8
Daily Norfloxacin vs. Weekly Ciprofloxacin to Prevent Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.每日诺氟沙星与每周环丙沙星预防自发性细菌性腹膜炎:一项随机对照试验。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Aug;113(8):1167-1176. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0168-7. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
9
[Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis].[自发性细菌性腹膜炎]
Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek. 2016 Dec;22(4):136-140.
10
Response-Guided Therapy With Cefotaxime, Ceftriaxone, or Ciprofloxacin for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis: A Randomized Trial: A Validation Study of 2021 AASLD Practice Guidance for SBP.头孢噻肟、头孢曲松或环丙沙星用于自发性细菌性腹膜炎的反应引导治疗:一项随机试验:2021年美国肝病研究学会自发性细菌性腹膜炎实践指南的验证研究
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Apr 1;118(4):654-663. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002126. Epub 2023 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Recent advances of precision immunotherapy in sepsis.脓毒症精准免疫治疗的最新进展
Burns Trauma. 2025 Jan 13;13:tkaf001. doi: 10.1093/burnst/tkaf001. eCollection 2025.
2
Differential expression of plasma cytokines in sepsis patients and their clinical implications.脓毒症患者血浆细胞因子的差异表达及其临床意义。
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Sep 6;12(25):5681-5696. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i25.5681.
3
Adjunctive immunotherapeutic agents in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a multidisciplinary consensus of 23.脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的辅助免疫治疗药物:23位专家的多学科共识
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2024 Apr 30;4(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s44158-024-00165-3.
4
Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment of end-stage liver disease complicated by infections.终末期肝病合并感染的诊断与治疗专家共识。
Hepatol Int. 2024 Jun;18(3):817-832. doi: 10.1007/s12072-023-10637-3. Epub 2024 Mar 9.
5
The impact of different antibiotic injection regimens on patients with severe infections: A meta-analysis.不同抗生素注射方案对重症感染患者的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Int Wound J. 2024 Jan;21(1):e14514. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14514.