• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

致编辑的信:诸如ChatGPT之类的自然语言处理系统不能列为作者,因为这些系统无法满足广泛采用的作者身份标准。

Letter to editor: NLP systems such as ChatGPT cannot be listed as an author because these cannot fulfill widely adopted authorship criteria.

作者信息

Yeo-Teh Nicole Shu Ling, Tang Bor Luen

机构信息

Research Compliance and Integrity Office, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Account Res. 2024 Oct;31(7):968-970. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2177160. Epub 2023 Feb 13.

DOI:10.1080/08989621.2023.2177160
PMID:36748354
Abstract

This letter to the editor suggests adding a technical point to the new editorial policy expounded by Hosseini et al. on the mandatory disclosure of any use of natural language processing (NLP) systems, or generative AI, in writing scholarly publications. Such AI systems should naturally also be forbidden from being named as authors, because they would not have fulfilled prevailing authorship guidelines (such as the widely adopted ICMJE authorship criteria).

摘要

这封致编辑的信建议在侯赛尼等人阐述的新编辑政策中增加一个技术要点,即在学术出版物写作中强制披露自然语言处理(NLP)系统或生成式人工智能的任何使用情况。此类人工智能系统自然也应被禁止列为作者,因为它们不符合现行的作者身份准则(如广泛采用的国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)作者身份标准)。

相似文献

1
Letter to editor: NLP systems such as ChatGPT cannot be listed as an author because these cannot fulfill widely adopted authorship criteria.致编辑的信:诸如ChatGPT之类的自然语言处理系统不能列为作者,因为这些系统无法满足广泛采用的作者身份标准。
Account Res. 2024 Oct;31(7):968-970. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2177160. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
2
Is ChatGPT a valid author?ChatGPT 是否为有效作者?
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Mar;68:103600. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103600. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
3
ICMJE authorship criteria are not met in a substantial proportion of manuscripts submitted to Biochemia Medica.提交给《生物化学医学》的大量稿件未符合国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)的作者资格标准。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Oct 15;25(3):324-34. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.033. eCollection 2015.
4
Biochemia Medica's editorial policy on authorship.《生物化学医学》关于作者身份的编辑政策。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Oct 15;25(3):320-3. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.031. eCollection 2015.
5
Best Practices for Using AI Tools as an Author, Peer Reviewer, or Editor.使用人工智能工具作为作者、同行评审员或编辑的最佳实践。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 31;25:e51584. doi: 10.2196/51584.
6
Let's be fair. What about an AI editor?让我们公平地说,人工智能编辑器如何?
Account Res. 2024 Nov;31(8):1253-1254. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2223997. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
7
Why do you think you should be the author on this manuscript? Analysis of open-ended responses of authors in a general medical journal.你为何认为自己应该成为这份手稿的作者?对某普通医学期刊作者开放性回复的分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Dec 20;12:189. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-189.
8
Significance of authorship position: an open-ended international assessment.作者署名位置的意义:一项开放式国际评估。
Am J Med Sci. 2011 Feb;341(2):106-9. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181f683a1.
9
ChatGPT: Detection in Academic Journals is Editors' and Publishers' Responsibilities.ChatGPT:学术期刊的检测是编辑和出版商的责任。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2023 Oct;51(10):2103-2104. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03247-5. Epub 2023 May 27.
10
Authorship in a small medical journal: a study of contributorship statements by corresponding authors.小型医学期刊中的作者身份:对通讯作者贡献声明的研究
Sci Eng Ethics. 2004 Jul;10(3):493-502. doi: 10.1007/s11948-004-0007-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating viewer engagement in esports through motivation and attitudes toward metaverse and NFTs.通过对元宇宙和 NFT 的动机与态度来调查电子竞技观众的参与度。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 27;14(1):19934. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-70847-z.
2
Using the Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer in academic writing in health: a scoping review.在健康学术写作中使用聊天生成式预训练转换器:范围综述。
Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2024 Jun 17;32:e4194. doi: 10.1590/1518-8345.7133.4194. eCollection 2024.
3
The Intersection of ChatGPT, Clinical Medicine, and Medical Education.
ChatGPT、临床医学与医学教育的交叉点
JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Nov 21;9:e47274. doi: 10.2196/47274.
4
A Comprehensive Survey of ChatGPT: Advancements, Applications, Prospects, and Challenges.ChatGPT综合调查:进展、应用、前景与挑战
Meta Radiol. 2023 Sep;1(2). doi: 10.1016/j.metrad.2023.100022. Epub 2023 Oct 7.
5
Perception of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (Chat-GPT) AI tool amongst MSK clinicians.肌肉骨骼疾病(MSK)临床医生对聊天生成预训练变换器(Chat-GPT)人工智能工具的认知。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2023 Sep 23;44:102253. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102253. eCollection 2023 Sep.
6
The underappreciated wrong of AIgiarism - bypass plagiarism that risks propagation of erroneous and bias content.未得到充分重视的抄袭之恶——规避抄袭却可能传播错误和有偏见的内容。
EXCLI J. 2023 Aug 26;22:907-910. doi: 10.17179/excli2023-6435. eCollection 2023.
7
Universal skepticism of ChatGPT: a review of early literature on chat generative pre-trained transformer.对ChatGPT的普遍怀疑:关于聊天生成预训练变换器的早期文献综述
Front Big Data. 2023 Aug 23;6:1224976. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2023.1224976. eCollection 2023.
8
ChatGPT's influence on customer experience in digital marketing: Investigating the moderating roles.ChatGPT对数字营销中客户体验的影响:探究调节作用。
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 2;9(8):e18770. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18770. eCollection 2023 Aug.