• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ChatGPT 是否为有效作者?

Is ChatGPT a valid author?

机构信息

Independent researcher, Ikenobe 3011-2, Kagawa-ken 761-0799, Japan.

出版信息

Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Mar;68:103600. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103600. Epub 2023 Mar 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103600
PMID:36906947
Abstract

This letter to the editors takes a deeper look at the validity and ethics of authorship of a recently published article in Nurse Education in Practice in which authorship was shared with a chatbox software program, ChatGPT (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103537). In particular, a closer assessment is made of the authorship of that article from the established principles of authorship as delineated by the ICMJE.

摘要

这封致编辑的信深入探讨了最近发表在《护士教育实践》(Nurse Education in Practice)杂志上的一篇文章的有效性和作者伦理问题,该文章的作者与聊天框软件程序 ChatGPT 共享了作者身份(https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103537)。特别是,根据国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)规定的作者身份原则,对该文章的作者身份进行了更详细的评估。

相似文献

1
Is ChatGPT a valid author?ChatGPT 是否为有效作者?
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Mar;68:103600. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103600. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
2
ChatGPT: Detection in Academic Journals is Editors' and Publishers' Responsibilities.ChatGPT:学术期刊的检测是编辑和出版商的责任。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2023 Oct;51(10):2103-2104. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03247-5. Epub 2023 May 27.
3
ChatGPT as an "author": Bibliometric analysis to assess the validity of authorship.作为“作者”的ChatGPT:评估作者身份有效性的文献计量分析
Account Res. 2024 May 1:1-11. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2024.2345713.
4
Letter to editor: NLP systems such as ChatGPT cannot be listed as an author because these cannot fulfill widely adopted authorship criteria.致编辑的信:诸如ChatGPT之类的自然语言处理系统不能列为作者,因为这些系统无法满足广泛采用的作者身份标准。
Account Res. 2024 Oct;31(7):968-970. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2177160. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
5
Passive Contribution of ChatGPT to Scientific Papers.ChatGPT对科学论文的被动贡献。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2023 Nov;51(11):2340-2350. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03260-8. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
6
How Authorship is Defined by Multiple Publishing Organizations and STM Publishers.多个出版组织和科技与医学出版商如何定义作者身份。
Account Res. 2016;23(2):97-122. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2015.1047927.
7
Mapping author taxonomies and author criteria: good practices for thinking through complex authorship situations.映射作者分类法和作者标准:应对复杂作者情况的良好实践。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Sep;38(9):1559-1565. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2083403. Epub 2022 Jun 14.
8
How are authors' contributions verified in the ICMJE model?在 ICMJE 模型中,如何验证作者的贡献?
Plant Cell Rep. 2023 Sep;42(9):1529-1530. doi: 10.1007/s00299-023-03022-9. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
9
[Author and authorship in medical journals].[医学期刊中的作者与署名]
Neurologia. 2009 Jan-Feb;24(1):1-6.
10
The ICMJE Recommendations and pharmaceutical marketing--strengths, weaknesses and the unsolved problem of attribution in publication ethics.国际医学期刊编辑委员会(ICMJE)建议与药品营销——出版伦理中的优势、劣势及未解决的归因问题
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Apr 4;17:20. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0103-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Will ChatGPT-4 improve the quality of medical abstracts?ChatGPT-4会提高医学摘要的质量吗?
Paediatr Child Health. 2024 Sep 12;30(3):116-121. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxae062. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Learning to Fake It: Limited Responses and Fabricated References Provided by ChatGPT for Medical Questions.学会伪装:ChatGPT对医学问题的有限回答与编造参考文献
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2023 Jun 12;1(3):226-234. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2023.05.004. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
Using ChatGPT in Nursing: Scoping Review of Current Opinions.
护理中使用ChatGPT:当前观点的范围综述
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Nov 19;10:e54297. doi: 10.2196/54297.
4
Evolution of Chatbots in Nursing Education: Narrative Review.护理教育中聊天机器人的发展:叙事性综述。
JMIR Med Educ. 2024 Jun 13;10:e54987. doi: 10.2196/54987.
5
ChatGPT and Corporations of Mega-journals Jeopardize the Norms That Underpin Academic Publishing.ChatGPT与大型期刊公司危及学术出版的基础规范。
Arch Iran Med. 2024 Feb 1;27(2):110-112. doi: 10.34172/aim.2024.17.
6
Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Education: Opportunities and Challenges.护理教育中的人工智能:机遇与挑战。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2023 Dec;82(12):302-305.
7
A SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) Analysis of ChatGPT in the Medical Literature: Concise Review.ChatGPT 在医学文献中的 SWOT(优势、劣势、机会和威胁)分析:简明回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 16;25:e49368. doi: 10.2196/49368.
8
Universal skepticism of ChatGPT: a review of early literature on chat generative pre-trained transformer.对ChatGPT的普遍怀疑:关于聊天生成预训练变换器的早期文献综述
Front Big Data. 2023 Aug 23;6:1224976. doi: 10.3389/fdata.2023.1224976. eCollection 2023.
9
Let's Look on the Bright Side of ChatGPT.让我们看看ChatGPT的光明面。
J Korean Med Sci. 2023 Jul 10;38(27):e231. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e231.
10
ChatGPT: Detection in Academic Journals is Editors' and Publishers' Responsibilities.ChatGPT:学术期刊的检测是编辑和出版商的责任。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2023 Oct;51(10):2103-2104. doi: 10.1007/s10439-023-03247-5. Epub 2023 May 27.