The underappreciated wrong of AIgiarism - bypass plagiarism that risks propagation of erroneous and bias content.
作者信息
Tang Bor Luen
机构信息
Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Health System, National University of Singapore.
出版信息
EXCLI J. 2023 Aug 26;22:907-910. doi: 10.17179/excli2023-6435. eCollection 2023.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
The underappreciated wrong of AIgiarism - bypass plagiarism that risks propagation of erroneous and bias content.未得到充分重视的抄袭之恶——规避抄袭却可能传播错误和有偏见的内容。
EXCLI J. 2023 Aug 26;22:907-910. doi: 10.17179/excli2023-6435. eCollection 2023.
2
3
Plagiarism: words and ideas.抄袭：文字与观点。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2008 Sep;14(3):311-22. doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9057-6.
4
‘No fair, copycat!’: what children’s response to plagiarism tells us about their understanding of ideas.“这不公平，抄袭！”：孩子们对剽窃的反应告诉了我们他们对创意的理解。
Dev Sci. 2011 Mar;14(2):431-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00993.x.
5
Self-reported attitudes and behaviours of medical students in Pakistan regarding academic misconduct: a cross-sectional study.巴基斯坦医学生对学术不端行为的自我报告态度和行为：一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2014 May 29;15:43. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-43.
6
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.预防科研与出版领域不当行为并促进诚信的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):MR000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2.
7
8
Dangers of doing right things in a wrong place.
Eur J Public Health. 2008 Oct;18(5):435. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckn068. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
9
[An erroneous citation linked to the vaccine cold chain].
Gac Sanit. 2009 Jul-Aug;23(4):351; author reply 352-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.12.006. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
10
Plagiarism, Fake Peer-Review, and Duplication: Predominant Reasons Underlying Retractions of Iran-Affiliated Scientific Papers.抄袭、虚假同行评审和重复发表：与伊朗相关的科学论文撤稿的主要原因
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Dec;26(6):3455-3463. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00274-6. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
引用本文的文献
1
Authors, beware of plagiarism in medical writing.作者们，谨防医学写作中的剽窃行为。
J Postgrad Med. 2025 Jan 1;71(1):1-6. doi: 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_25_25. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
2
AI is revolutionizing biomedical research, but are there any negatives?人工智能正在彻底改变生物医学研究，但它有什么负面影响吗？
EXCLI J. 2024 Oct 8;23:1226-1228. doi: 10.17179/excli2024-7761. eCollection 2024.
3
To combat poor quality research, eliminate publication requirements.为了对抗低质量研究，取消发表要求。
EXCLI J. 2024 Jun 7;23:883-887. doi: 10.17179/excli2024-7428. eCollection 2024.
本文引用的文献
1
With great power comes great responsibility - deductions of using ChatGPT for medical research.能力越大，责任越大——关于在医学研究中使用ChatGPT的推断。
EXCLI J. 2023 Jun 12;22:499-501. doi: 10.17179/excli2023-6163. eCollection 2023.
2
Generative AI meets copyright.生成式 AI 与版权。
Science. 2023 Jul 14;381(6654):158-161. doi: 10.1126/science.adi0656. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
3
Scientists used ChatGPT to generate an entire paper from scratch - but is it any good?科学家利用ChatGPT从零开始生成了一整篇论文——但它质量如何呢？
Nature. 2023 Jul;619(7970):443-444. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-02218-z.
4
ChatGPT Produces Fabricated References and Falsehoods When Used for Scientific Literature Search.ChatGPT用于科学文献检索时会生成虚假参考文献和错误信息。
J Card Fail. 2023 Sep;29(9):1332-1334. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.06.015. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
5
Let's be fair. What about an AI editor?让我们公平地说，人工智能编辑器如何？
Account Res. 2024 Nov;31(8):1253-1254. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2223997. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
6
Fighting reviewer fatigue or amplifying bias? Considerations and recommendations for use of ChatGPT and other large language models in scholarly peer review.对抗审稿人疲劳还是加剧偏见？关于在学术同行评审中使用ChatGPT和其他大语言模型的思考与建议。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2023 May 18;8(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s41073-023-00133-5.
7
Exploring the Boundaries of Reality: Investigating the Phenomenon of Artificial Intelligence Hallucination in Scientific Writing Through ChatGPT References.探索现实的边界：通过ChatGPT参考文献研究科学写作中的人工智能幻觉现象。
Cureus. 2023 Apr 11;15(4):e37432. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37432. eCollection 2023 Apr.
8
Artificial Hallucinations in ChatGPT: Implications in Scientific Writing.ChatGPT中的人工幻觉：对科学写作的影响
Cureus. 2023 Feb 19;15(2):e35179. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35179. eCollection 2023 Feb.
9
Letter to editor: NLP systems such as ChatGPT cannot be listed as an author because these cannot fulfill widely adopted authorship criteria.致编辑的信：诸如ChatGPT之类的自然语言处理系统不能列为作者，因为这些系统无法满足广泛采用的作者身份标准。
Account Res. 2024 Oct;31(7):968-970. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2177160. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
10
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove.研究论文将ChatGPT列为作者：许多科学家表示反对。
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7945):620-621. doi: 10.1038/d41586-023-00107-z.
Zotero 插件