Suppr超能文献

半月线疝修补术后的结局:一项全国性数据库研究

Outcomes After Spigelian Hernia Repair: A Nationwide Database Study.

作者信息

Lode Lise, Jensen Kristian K, Helgstrand Frederik, Henriksen Nadia A

机构信息

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hvidovre Hospital, Kettegård Alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.

Digestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2023 May;47(5):1184-1189. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-06923-8. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Spigelian hernia is a rare hernia of the abdominal wall. Due to lack of evidence, there is no standard recommendation for surgical technique of Spigelian hernia repair. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes after open and laparoscopic, elective and emergency repair of Spigelian hernias on a nationwide basis.

METHODS

Nationwide data from the Danish Ventral Hernia Database and the National Patient Registry was assessed to analyze outcomes after Spigelian hernia repair. A total of 365 patients were operated for Spigelian hernia in Denmark from 2007 to 2018. Ninety-day readmission, 90-day reoperation and long-term operation for recurrence were evaluated, as well as possible differences between open and laparoscopic, and elective and emergency repairs.

RESULTS

Most of the patients (80.5%, 294/365) were operated by laparoscopic approach and 19.5% (71/365) were operated by open approach. Elective surgery was performed in 83.6% (305/365) of the patients and 16.4% (60/365) underwent emergency repair. There were no significant differences in 90-day readmission or reoperation rates between open or laparoscopic Spigelian hernia repairs, P = 0.778 and P = 0.531. Ninety-day readmission and 90-day reoperation rates were also comparable for elective versus emergency repair, P = 0.399 and P = 0.766. No difference was found in operation for recurrence rates between elective and emergency, nor open and laparoscopic Spigelian hernia repairs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that 16% of Spigelian hernia repairs are done in the emergency setting. Open and laparoscopic approach are comparable in terms of early readmission, reoperation, and recurrence rates.

摘要

背景

半月线疝是一种罕见的腹壁疝。由于缺乏证据,对于半月线疝修补的手术技术尚无标准推荐。本研究的目的是在全国范围内评估开放性和腹腔镜下选择性及急诊修补半月线疝后的效果。

方法

评估来自丹麦腹疝数据库和国家患者登记处的全国性数据,以分析半月线疝修补后的效果。2007年至2018年期间,丹麦共有365例患者接受了半月线疝手术。评估了90天再入院率、90天再次手术率和复发的长期手术情况,以及开放性和腹腔镜手术、选择性和急诊修补之间可能存在的差异。

结果

大多数患者(80.5%,294/365)采用腹腔镜手术入路,19.5%(71/365)采用开放手术入路。83.6%(305/365)的患者接受了择期手术,16.4%(60/365)接受了急诊修补。开放性或腹腔镜半月线疝修补术后90天再入院率或再次手术率无显著差异,P = 0.778和P = 0.531。择期手术与急诊修补的90天再入院率和90天再次手术率也相当,P = 0.399和P = 0.766。在择期和急诊、开放性和腹腔镜半月线疝修补的复发率手术方面未发现差异。

结论

本研究表明,16%的半月线疝修补是在急诊情况下进行的。开放性和腹腔镜手术入路在早期再入院率、再次手术率和复发率方面相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验