Department of Psychology, Clinical and Applied Psychology Unit (CAPU), University of Sheffield, 1 Vicar Lane, S1 2LT, Sheffield, UK.
School of Health Sciences, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 7;23(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04404-1.
There is debate about how best to increase access to psychological therapy and deliver mental healthcare effectively and efficiently at a national level. One trend is the increased use of the telephone to deliver therapy. However, there is the potential to disadvantage certain patient groups and/or impact on uptake of help. This study aims to answer three questions: (i) Which factors are associated with being offered an assessment by telephone? (ii) Which factors are associated with attendance at assessment? and (iii) What is the impact of an assessment by telephone on subsequent treatment appointment?
Routine outcome data was provided by seven UK Improving Access to Psychological Therapy services. The analysis sample comprised 49,923 patients who referred to 615 general practices in 2017. Multilevel modelling, including service and GP practice as random factors, was used to answer the three research questions.
The offer of an initial assessment by telephone was strongly associated with local service configuration. Patient self-referral, a shorter wait, greater age and lower deprivation were associated with attendance at assessment and subsequent treatment session. Telephone mode assessment had no impact on the uptake of the assessment but may influence the uptake of further treatment if this was also by telephone. The practitioner carrying out the assessment had a significant effect on subsequent treatment uptake.
Offering telephone assessments does not have a negative impact on uptake of assessment and services may benefit by facilitating and integrating telephone assessments into their systems. The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the use of telephone and other remote means of delivery, and results from this study can inform services to consider how best to re-configure post-pandemic.
关于如何最好地增加心理治疗的可及性,并在国家层面有效和高效地提供精神保健,存在争议。一种趋势是越来越多地使用电话来提供治疗。然而,这有可能使某些患者群体处于不利地位,和/或影响寻求帮助的人数。本研究旨在回答三个问题:(i)哪些因素与通过电话进行评估有关?(ii)哪些因素与参加评估有关?和(iii)通过电话进行评估对随后的治疗预约有何影响?
英国改善心理治疗服务的七个机构提供了常规结果数据。分析样本包括 2017 年向 615 家普通诊所转诊的 49923 名患者。使用多水平模型,包括服务和 GP 实践作为随机因素,回答了三个研究问题。
通过电话进行初始评估的提议与当地服务配置密切相关。患者自我转诊、较短的等待时间、更大的年龄和较低的贫困程度与参加评估和随后的治疗会议有关。电话模式评估对评估的接受率没有影响,但如果进一步的治疗也是通过电话进行的,可能会影响进一步治疗的接受率。进行评估的从业者对随后的治疗接受率有显著影响。
提供电话评估不会对评估的接受率产生负面影响,并且服务可能会受益于促进和整合电话评估到其系统中。COVID-19 大流行加速了电话和其他远程交付方式的使用,本研究的结果可以为服务提供信息,以考虑如何在大流行后最好地重新配置。