Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York, York, UK.
NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care and Centre for Health Informatics, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Sociol Health Illn. 2021 Jan;43(1):3-19. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13182. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
This article considers patient choice in mental healthcare services, specifically the ways that choice is enabled or constrained in patient-practitioner spoken interaction. Using the method of conversation analysis (CA), we examine the language used by practitioners when presenting treatment delivery options to patients entering the NHS Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) service. Analysis of 66 recordings of telephone-delivered IAPT assessment sessions revealed three patterns through which choice of treatment delivery mode was presented to patients: presenting a single delivery mode; incrementally presenting alternative delivery modes, in response to patient resistance; and parallel presentation of multiple delivery mode options. We show that a distinction should be made between (i) a choice to accept or reject the offer of a single option and (ii) a choice that is a selection from a range of options. We show that the three patterns identified are ordered in terms of patient-centredness and shared decision-making. Our findings contribute to sociological work on healthcare interactions that has identified variability in, and variable consequences for, the ways that patients and practitioners negotiate choice and shared decision-making. Findings are discussed in relation to tensions between the political ideology of patient choice and practical service delivery constraints.
本文探讨了精神保健服务中的患者选择问题,具体研究了患者与从业者在口语互动中如何做出选择或受到限制。我们采用会话分析法(CA),研究了从业者在向 NHS Improving Access to Psychological Therapies(IAPT)服务的患者介绍治疗方案时所使用的语言。对 66 次电话咨询 IAPT 评估会议的记录进行分析后,揭示了向患者介绍治疗方式的三种模式:一是单一治疗模式;二是在患者表示抗拒时,逐渐提出替代治疗模式;三是同时呈现多种治疗模式。我们发现,应该对(i)接受或拒绝单一治疗方案的选择,和(ii)在一系列治疗方案中做出选择进行区分。我们还发现,所确定的三种模式在以患者为中心和共同决策方面是有序的。我们的研究结果丰富了关于医患互动的社会学研究,该研究已经确定了患者和从业者在协商选择和共同决策方面的多样性及其带来的不同结果。研究结果还讨论了患者选择的政治意识形态与实际服务提供之间的紧张关系。