Duquesnoy R J, Marrari M, Walker R H
Division of Clinical Immunopathology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, PA 15213-3417.
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1987 Dec;111(12):1101-5.
Two histocompatibility testing surveys were conducted over a five-year period by the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics and the College of American Pathologists. More than 200 laboratories participated in the HS survey, which consisted of four shipments of cells and serum samples to be tested for ABO type, HLA-A and -B types, antibody identification, and lymphocytotoxicity crossmatching. About 100 laboratories participated in the DR survey, which consisted of four annual shipments to be tested for HLA-DR and -DQ types, antibody identification, and crossmatching. The results of the analysis of the HLA-typing results showed high consistency (generally greater than 90%) among laboratories in the definition of most recognized HLA antigens. In contrast, the HLA antibody screening was generally less consistent between laboratories. On the basis of 90% or greater consensus among participants, it was possible to develop a performance grading system.
美国组织相容性与免疫遗传学学会和美国病理学家学会在五年时间内进行了两项组织相容性检测调查。超过200家实验室参与了HS调查,该调查包括四批用于检测ABO血型、HLA - A和 - B型、抗体鉴定以及淋巴细胞毒性交叉配型的细胞和血清样本。约100家实验室参与了DR调查,该调查包括四批年度样本,用于检测HLA - DR和 - DQ型、抗体鉴定以及交叉配型。HLA分型结果的分析结果显示,在大多数公认的HLA抗原定义方面,各实验室之间具有高度一致性(通常大于90%)。相比之下,HLA抗体筛查在各实验室之间的一致性通常较低。基于参与者之间90%或更高的共识,有可能制定一个性能分级系统。