Duquesnoy R J, Marrari M
Division of Transplant Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, PA 15261.
Hum Immunol. 1994 Feb;39(2):96-105. doi: 10.1016/0198-8859(94)90107-4.
This report summarizes the 8-year experience of the DR survey program designed to evaluate the performance of histocompatibility laboratories in the serologic typing of cell specimens for HLA-DR and HLA-DQ polymorphisms and the HLA class II antibody identification and B-cell crossmatching of serum specimens. The number of participants increased from 45 in 1985 to 214 in 1992. Although the performance criteria are based on laboratory consensus, the availability of DNA typing since 1990 has enabled a critical assessment of the reliability of serologic HLA-DR, DQ typing. The survey results shows that unsplit HLA class II antigens DR1-DR8, DR52/53, and DQ1-3 are generally correctly identified in over 90% of the participating laboratories. DR9 and DR10 have not yet been tested and testing for DQ4 has not yet achieved this level on consensus. In contrast, the assignments of serologic subtypes of HLA-DR and HLA-DQ are less consistent and frequently unreliable. Although the B-cell crossmatches show generally high laboratory consensus rates, the serum screening results show frequently inconsistent results regarding HLA class-II-specific antibody identification.
本报告总结了一项为期8年的DR调查项目的经验,该项目旨在评估组织相容性实验室在对细胞标本进行HLA-DR和HLA-DQ多态性血清学分型以及对血清标本进行HLA II类抗体鉴定和B细胞交叉配型方面的表现。参与者人数从1985年的45人增加到了1992年的214人。尽管性能标准基于实验室共识,但自1990年以来DNA分型技术的应用使得对血清学HLA-DR、DQ分型的可靠性进行严格评估成为可能。调查结果显示,超过90%的参与实验室能够正确识别未拆分的HLA II类抗原DR1-DR8、DR52/53以及DQ1-3。DR9和DR10尚未进行检测,并且DQ4的检测尚未达到这一普遍认可的水平。相比之下,HLA-DR和HLA-DQ血清学亚型的分型一致性较差且常常不可靠。尽管B细胞交叉配型的实验室共识率普遍较高,但血清筛查结果在HLA II类特异性抗体鉴定方面常常出现不一致的结果。