O'Neill Louisa, El Haddad Milad, Berte Benjamin, Kobza Richard, Hilfiker Gabriela, Scherr Daniel, Manninger Martin, Wijnmaalen Adrianus P, Trines Serge A, Wielandts Jean-Yves, Gillis Kris, Lycke Michelle, De Becker Benjamin, Tavernier Rene, Le Polain De Waroux Jean-Benoit, Knecht Sebastien, Duytschaever Mattias
Department of Cardiology, AZ Sint-Jan Hospital, Bruges, Belgium.
Department of Cardiology, AZ Sint-Jan Hospital, Bruges, Belgium.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023 Apr;9(4):511-522. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.10.039. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
Very high-power, short-duration (90-W/4-second) ablation for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) may reduce procedural times. However, shorter applications with higher power may impact lesion quality.
In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, the authors compared procedural efficiency, efficacy, and safety of PVI using 90-W/4-second ablation to 35/50-W ablation.
Patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing first-time PVI were randomized to pulmonary vein encirclement with contiguous applications using very high-power, short-duration applications (90 W over 4 seconds) or 35/50-W applications (titrated up to ablation index >550 anteriorly and >400 posteriorly). Prospective endpoints were procedural efficiency (procedure time and first-pass isolation), safety (including esophageal endoscopic evaluation), and 6-month effectiveness using repetitive Holter monitoring.
A total of 180 patients were randomized, 90 to the 90-W group (mean age: 64.2 ± 8.9 years) and 90 to the 35/50-W group (mean age: 62.3 ± 10.8 years). Procedural time was shorter in the 90-W group vs the 35/50-W group (70 [IQR: 60-80] minutes vs 75 [IQR: 65-88.3] minutes; P = 0.009). A nonsignificant trend towards lower rates of first-pass isolation was seen in the 90-W group (83.9% vs 90%; P = 0.0852). No major complications were observed in both groups with esophageal injury occurring in 1 patient per group. At 6 months, 17% of patients in the 90-W group vs 15% in the 35/50-W group experienced recurrent arrhythmia (P = 0.681).
Contiguous ablation using very high-power, short-duration applications results in a significant but modest reduction in procedure time with similar safety and 6-month efficacy vs a conventional approach. A hybrid approach combining both ablation modalities might be the most optimal strategy. (POWER PLUS [Very High Power Ablation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Schedule for a First Pulmonary Vein Isolation]; NCT04784013).
用于肺静脉隔离(PVI)的超高功率、短持续时间(90瓦/4秒)消融可能会缩短手术时间。然而,更高功率的更短时间应用可能会影响损伤质量。
在这项多中心随机对照试验中,作者比较了使用90瓦/4秒消融与35/50瓦消融进行PVI的手术效率、疗效和安全性。
首次接受PVI的阵发性或持续性心房颤动患者被随机分为两组,一组采用超高功率、短持续时间的连续应用(4秒内90瓦)进行肺静脉环绕消融,另一组采用35/50瓦的应用(向前滴定至消融指数>550,向后滴定至消融指数>400)。前瞻性终点包括手术效率(手术时间和首次隔离)、安全性(包括食管内镜评估)以及使用重复动态心电图监测的6个月疗效。
共有180例患者被随机分组,90例进入90瓦组(平均年龄:64.2±8.9岁),90例进入35/50瓦组(平均年龄:62.3±10.8岁)。90瓦组的手术时间比35/50瓦组短(70[四分位间距:60 - 80]分钟对75[四分位间距:65 - 88.3]分钟;P = 0.009)。90瓦组首次隔离率有降低的趋势,但无统计学意义(83.9%对90%;P = 0.0852)。两组均未观察到重大并发症,每组各有1例患者发生食管损伤。6个月时,90瓦组17%的患者与35/50瓦组15%的患者出现心律失常复发(P = 0.681)。
与传统方法相比,采用超高功率、短持续时间的连续消融可显著但适度缩短手术时间,且安全性和6个月疗效相似。结合两种消融方式的混合方法可能是最优化策略。(POWER PLUS[心房颤动患者首次肺静脉隔离的超高功率消融计划];NCT04784013)