De Falco Vincenzo, Suarato Gabriella, Napolitano Rossella, Argenziano Giuseppe, Famiglietti Vincenzo, Amato Annarita, Servetto Alberto, Bianco Roberto, Formisano Luigi, Terrano Vincenzo, Esposito Alfonso, Giugliano Maria Cristina, Ciardiello Davide, Ciardiello Fortunato, Napolitano Stefania, Troiani Teresa
Medical Oncology, Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Biotechnology, Molecular Medicine and Medical Histology, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
Int J Cancer. 2023 Jul 1;153(1):133-140. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34462. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
Adjuvant immunotherapy (IO) and targeted therapy (TT) have improved relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with stage III melanoma, although about 25% of them relapse within a year. However, real-world data on treatment efficacy and safety as well as management of treatment recurrences are still limited. We retrospectively analyzed 113 patients with stage III melanoma who received at least one cycle of anti-PD-1 (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) or dabrafenib + trametinib as adjuvant therapy. Most of patients included into the analyses harbor BRAV600E mutation (66.4%) and had a stage IIIC melanoma (63.7%). Immunotherapy was administered in 48.7% of patients, whereas targeted therapy in 51.3% At data cut-off, median RFS was not reached with 12- and 24-months RFS of 81% and 64%, respectively. No new adverse events were registered. Thirty patients (26.5%) relapsed, mainly at distant sites. Patient treated with IO recurred mostly during adjuvant treatment (ON-treatment) while patients treated with TT relapsed at the end of treatment (OFF-treatment). At relapse, surgery, radiotherapy and systemic therapy were used alone or in combination. Among patients who started a first-line therapy, an excellent response switching to a different treatment was observed. Real-world outcomes and safety of adjuvant treatment for resected stage III melanoma appear comparable to clinical trials data. Moreover, management of recurrences depends on type of relapse (loco-regional vs distant) and timing (during vs OFF treatment). Furthermore, patients who relapse after adjuvant TT respond well to subsequent anti-PD1 based therapy.
辅助免疫疗法(IO)和靶向疗法(TT)改善了III期黑色素瘤患者的无复发生存期(RFS),尽管其中约25%的患者在一年内复发。然而,关于治疗疗效和安全性以及治疗复发管理的真实世界数据仍然有限。我们回顾性分析了113例接受至少一个周期抗PD-1(纳武单抗或帕博利珠单抗)或达拉非尼+曲美替尼作为辅助治疗的III期黑色素瘤患者。纳入分析的大多数患者携带BRAF V600E突变(66.4%)且患有IIIC期黑色素瘤(63.7%)。48.7%的患者接受免疫治疗,而51.3%的患者接受靶向治疗。在数据截止时,未达到中位RFS,12个月和24个月的RFS分别为81%和64%。未记录到新的不良事件。30例患者(26.5%)复发,主要是远处复发。接受IO治疗的患者大多在辅助治疗期间(治疗期间)复发,而接受TT治疗的患者在治疗结束时(治疗后)复发。复发时,单独或联合使用手术、放疗和全身治疗。在开始一线治疗的患者中,观察到换用不同治疗后有良好反应。切除的III期黑色素瘤辅助治疗的真实世界疗效和安全性似乎与临床试验数据相当。此外,复发的管理取决于复发类型(局部区域复发与远处复发)和时间(治疗期间与治疗后)。此外,辅助TT治疗后复发的患者对随后基于抗PD1的治疗反应良好。