Salam T A Abdul, Varghese Sheeja S, Shenoy Rekha P
Public Health Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Periodontology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Cureus. 2023 Jan 6;15(1):e33471. doi: 10.7759/cureus.33471. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Objective This study was intended to compare the mean buccolingual measurement of abraded teeth with/without sensitivity. The hypothesis was that the suggested treatment approaches would be in agreement with that of the treatment needs (TN) elicited using the Cervical Abrasion Index of Treatment Needs (CAITN) probe and aid in the development of a prospective CAITN index for clinical/community studies of effective therapeutic measures. Materials and methods A cross-sectional study was carried out on 30 individuals with a mean age of 48.4±12.54 years, comprising 840 teeth with/without cervical abrasion. The buccolingual measurement of each tooth was recorded using the CAITN probe. The response to air-blast was assessed by a short blast of one-second duration at a distance of 1 cm for each tooth. An endodontist was also asked to indicate the treatment methods used by him for the treatment of abrasions. His opinions regarding the TN were later compared with the data collected by an investigator. Results The mean buccolingual measurements of all the teeth were compared with the dentinal sensitivity using the independent t-test and were statistically highly significant. Furthermore, one-way analysis of variance disclosed that there was a statistically highly significant difference found for all the TN (p<0.01) such as none, preventive, basic, and advanced restorative TN followed by Tukey honestly significant difference post hoc tests for multiple pair-wise comparisons. The running receiver operator characteristic curve discloses the best cut-off value of the buccolingual measurement to predict the various categories of TN of each tooth. As the area under the curve is more close to 1 (noticed in the majority of the teeth in the sample), the model predicts the TN more precisely based on the buccolingual measurements. Conclusion The present study enables a correct diagnosis of cervical abrasions and determines the various TN with the most appropriate restorative material. These baseline data help to design clinical studies that test relevant treatment and diagnostic strategies.
目的 本研究旨在比较有/无敏感症状的磨损牙齿的颊舌径测量值。假设是所建议的治疗方法将与使用治疗需求的颈部磨损指数(CAITN)探针得出的治疗需求(TN)一致,并有助于开发用于有效治疗措施的临床/社区研究的前瞻性CAITN指数。材料和方法 对30名平均年龄为48.4±12.54岁的个体进行了横断面研究,包括840颗有/无颈部磨损的牙齿。使用CAITN探针记录每颗牙齿的颊舌径测量值。对每颗牙齿在距离1 cm处进行持续一秒的短暂吹气,评估其对吹气的反应。还请一位牙髓病医生指出他用于治疗磨损的方法。随后将他对TN的意见与研究者收集的数据进行比较。结果 使用独立t检验将所有牙齿的平均颊舌径测量值与牙本质敏感情况进行比较,具有高度统计学意义。此外,单因素方差分析表明,对于所有TN(无、预防性、基本性和高级修复性TN),存在高度统计学差异(p<0.01),随后进行Tukey真实显著差异事后检验以进行多组两两比较。运行的受试者工作特征曲线揭示了颊舌径测量的最佳截断值,以预测每颗牙齿的各种TN类别。由于曲线下面积更接近1(在样本中的大多数牙齿中观察到),该模型基于颊舌径测量更精确地预测TN。结论 本研究能够正确诊断颈部磨损,并使用最合适的修复材料确定各种TN。这些基线数据有助于设计测试相关治疗和诊断策略的临床研究。