Schoenmakers Jorrit Willem Adriaan, de Boer Rosanne, Gard Lilli, Kampinga Greetje Anna, van Oosten Marleen, van Dijl Jan Maarten, Jutte Paulus Christiaan, Wouthuyzen-Bakker Marjan
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, UMCG, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Bone Jt Infect. 2023 Jan 18;8(1):45-50. doi: 10.5194/jbji-8-45-2023. eCollection 2023.
: prompt recognition and identification of the causative microorganism in acute septic arthritis of native and prosthetic joints is vital to increase the chances of successful treatment. The aim of this study was to independently assess the diagnostic accuracy of the multiplex BIOFIRE Joint Infection (JI) Panel (investigational use only) in synovial fluid for rapid diagnosis. : synovial fluid samples were collected at the University Medical Center Groningen from patients who had a clinical suspicion of a native septic arthritis, early acute (post-operative, within 3 months after arthroplasty) periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) or late acute (hematogenous, months after arthroplasty) PJI. JI Panel results were compared to infection according to Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria and culture-based methods as reference standard. : a total of 45 samples were analysed. The BIOFIRE JI Panel showed a high specificity (100 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 78-100) in all patient categories. Sensitivity was 83 % (95 % CI: 44-97) for patients with a clinical suspicion of native septic arthritis ( ), 73 % (95 % CI: 48-89) for patients with a clinical suspicion of a late acute PJI ( ), and 30 % (95 % CI: 11-60) for patients with a clinical suspicion of an early acute PJI ( ). : the results of this study indicate a clear clinical benefit of the BIOFIRE JI Panel in patients with a suspected native septic arthritis and late acute (hematogenous) PJI, but a low clinical benefit in patients with an early acute (post-operative) PJI due to the absence of certain relevant microorganisms, such as , from the panel.
及时识别和鉴定天然关节和人工关节急性化脓性关节炎的致病微生物对于提高成功治疗的几率至关重要。本研究的目的是独立评估用于快速诊断的多重BIOFIRE关节感染(JI)检测板(仅用于研究)在滑液中的诊断准确性。在格罗宁根大学医学中心,从临床怀疑患有天然化脓性关节炎、早期急性(术后,关节置换术后3个月内)人工关节周围感染(PJI)或晚期急性(血源性,关节置换术后数月)PJI的患者中采集滑液样本。JI检测板的结果与根据肌肉骨骼感染学会标准判定的感染情况以及基于培养的方法进行比较,后者作为参考标准。共分析了45个样本。BIOFIRE JI检测板在所有患者类别中均显示出高特异性(100%,95%置信区间(CI):78 - 100)。对于临床怀疑患有天然化脓性关节炎的患者,敏感性为83%(95%CI:44 - 97)( );对于临床怀疑患有晚期急性PJI的患者,敏感性为73%(95%CI:48 - 89)( );对于临床怀疑患有早期急性PJI的患者,敏感性为30%(95%CI:11 - 60)( )。本研究结果表明,BIOFIRE JI检测板对于疑似天然化脓性关节炎和晚期急性(血源性)PJI的患者具有明显的临床益处,但对于早期急性(术后)PJI患者,由于检测板中缺乏某些相关微生物,如 ,临床益处较低。