Medical Clinic I, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
National Center for Tumor Diseases, Dresden, Germany.
JAMA Oncol. 2023 Apr 1;9(4):519-526. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.7605.
The ideal postremission strategy in intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in first complete remission (CR) has been a matter of debate.
To explore the optimal therapy for patients with intermediate-risk AML after first complete remission.
DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: This investigator-initiated, open-label, 2-armed, phase 3 randomized clinical trial assessed patients at 16 hospitals in Germany from February 2, 2011, until July 1, 2018. Key eligibility criteria included cytogenetically defined intermediate-risk AML according to Medical Research Council classification, first CR or CR with incomplete blood cell count recovery after conventional induction therapy, age of 18 to 60 years, and availability of a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling or unrelated donor. A detailed statistical analysis plan was written and finalized on July 7, 2020. Data were exported for analysis on April 13, 2021.
Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) or high-dose cytarabine for consolidation and salvage HCT only in case of relapse. Strata for randomization included age (18-40 vs 41-60 years), NPM1 and CEBPA variation status, and donor type (unrelated vs related).
End points included overall-survival as the primary outcome and disease-free survival, cumulative incidence of relapse, treatment-related mortality, and quality of life measured according to the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey as secondary outcomes.
A total of 143 patients (mean [SD] age, 48.2 [9.8] years; 81 [57%] male) with AML who fulfilled the eligibility criteria were randomized. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the probability of survival at 2 years was 74% (95% CI, 62%-83%) after primary allogeneic HCT and 84% (95% CI, 73%-92%) after consolidation chemotherapy (P = .22). Disease-free survival after HCT at 2 years was 69% (95% CI, 57%-80%) compared with 40% (95% CI, 28%-53%) after consolidation chemotherapy (P = .001). Allogeneic HCT during the first CR was associated with a cumulative incidence of relapse at 2 years of 20% (95% CI, 13%-31%) compared with 58% (95% CI, 47%-71%; P < .001). Nonrelapse mortality at 2 years after primary allogeneic HCT was 9% (95% CI, 5%-19%) and 2% (95% CI, 0%-11%) after consolidation chemotherapy (P = .005). Similar outcomes were observed when analyses were confined to the 96 patients at intermediate risk according to the European Leukemia Network classification. Most importantly, all 41 patients relapsing after consolidation chemotherapy (36 hematologic, 4 molecular, and 1 extramedullary) proceeded to allogeneic HCT. No significant differences in health-related quality of life measures were observed between groups.
Primary allogeneic HCT during first CR was not associated with superior overall survival compared with consolidation chemotherapy in patients 60 years or younger with intermediate-risk AML during the first CR and an available donor.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01246752.
在首次完全缓解(CR)的中危急性髓系白血病(AML)中,理想的缓解后策略一直存在争议。
探索中危 AML 患者首次完全缓解后的最佳治疗方法。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项由德国 16 家医院的研究人员发起的、开放性、2 臂、3 期随机临床试验,于 2011 年 2 月 2 日至 2018 年 7 月 1 日进行。主要入选标准包括根据医学研究委员会分类的细胞遗传学定义的中危 AML、首次 CR 或常规诱导治疗后不完全血细胞计数恢复的 CR、年龄在 18 至 60 岁之间,以及是否有 HLA 匹配的同胞或无关供体。详细的统计分析计划于 2020 年 7 月 7 日编写并定稿。数据于 2021 年 4 月 13 日导出进行分析。
患者按 1:1 随机接受异基因造血细胞移植(HCT)或高剂量阿糖胞苷巩固治疗,仅在复发时进行挽救性 HCT。随机分层因素包括年龄(18-40 岁与 41-60 岁)、NPM1 和 CEBPA 变异状态以及供体类型(无关与亲缘)。
终点包括总生存作为主要结局和无病生存、累积复发率、治疗相关死亡率以及根据医疗结局研究 36 项简明健康调查测量的生活质量作为次要结局。
共有 143 名符合条件的 AML 患者(平均[标准差]年龄 48.2[9.8]岁;81[57%]为男性)被随机分组。在意向治疗分析中,初次异基因 HCT后的 2 年生存率为 74%(95%CI,62%-83%),巩固化疗后为 84%(95%CI,73%-92%)(P=0.22)。HCT 后 2 年的无病生存率为 69%(95%CI,57%-80%),而巩固化疗后为 40%(95%CI,28%-53%)(P=0.001)。初次 CR 期间进行异基因 HCT与 2 年内的累积复发率为 20%(95%CI,13%-31%)相比,58%(95%CI,47%-71%;P<0.001)。初次异基因 HCT 后 2 年的非复发死亡率为 9%(95%CI,5%-19%),巩固化疗后为 2%(95%CI,0%-11%)(P=0.005)。当分析仅限于根据欧洲白血病网络分类为中危的 96 名患者时,观察到了类似的结果。最重要的是,所有 41 名在巩固化疗后复发的患者(36 例血液学,4 例分子,1 例骨髓外)均接受了异基因 HCT。两组之间的健康相关生活质量测量无显著差异。
在首次 CR 中,对于年龄在 60 岁或以下且有可用供体的中危 AML 患者,初次 CR 期间进行异基因 HCT 与巩固化疗相比,并不与总生存相关。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01246752。