Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A report from multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention registry.

BACKGROUND

High mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors [SMuRFs (e.g. diabetes, hypertension, smoking, and dyslipidemia)] has been reported. However, details regarding their acute presentation and reasons for the excess risk remain unclear.

METHOD

Patient-level data were extracted from a multicenter procedure-based registry (KiCS-PCI). We analyzed consecutive patients with ACS who underwent de novo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2009 and 2020. The primary outcome of interest was the in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Among the 10,523 patients with ACS, 7775 met the inclusion criteria. Patients without SMuRFs who underwent PCI [n = 529 (6.8 %)] were older [median 71 (IQR: 63-79) vs. 68 (59-76) years, p < 0.001] and more often presented with cardiogenic shock or cardiopulmonary arrest (14.6 % vs. 8.6 %, p < 0.001; 12.7 % vs. 5.3 %, p < 0.001, respectively). In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), median door-to-balloon time was significantly longer in SMuRF-less patients (90 min vs 82 min). In-hospital death was significantly higher in SMuRF-less patients [10.2 % vs. 4.1 %, p < 0.001, adjusted odds ratio, 1.81 (95%CI, 1.26-2.59); p = 0.001], whereas the rate of procedural complications showed no significant difference. When stratified by the ACS presentation pattern, the findings were consistent, although the association between SMuRF-less and the increased risk of in-hospital mortality was not statistically significant in patients with non-ST-elevation- (NSTE)-ACS.

CONCLUSIONS

SMuRF-less ACS patients frequently presented with cardiopulmonary arrest and/or cardiogenic shock, leading to high in-hospital mortality. When stratified by the ACS presentation pattern, the association of SMuRF-less and the increased risk of mortality was more prominent in STEMI patients and it was not statistically significant in NSTE-ACS patients. Almost half of these patients had amendable left main trunk or left anterior descending artery disease and treating clinicians should be aware of this paradox to avoid the delay in treatment.