• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

无标准可调节风险因素的急性冠脉综合征患者的长期预后:一项对 5400 名亚洲患者的多民族回顾性队列研究。

Long-term outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients without standard modifiable risk factors: a multi-ethnic retrospective cohort study Of 5400 asian patients.

机构信息

Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre, National University Health System, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore, 119074, Singapore.

出版信息

J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 Nov;54(4):569-578. doi: 10.1007/s11239-022-02704-7. Epub 2022 Sep 12.

DOI:10.1007/s11239-022-02704-7
PMID:36094686
Abstract

A sizeable number of patients without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs), such as hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia and smoking, suffer from acute coronary syndrome (ACS). These SMuRF-less patients have high short-term morbidity and mortality. We compared both short- and long-term outcomes of SMuRF-less and SMuRF ACS patients in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort.This was a retrospective study of patients with first ACS from 2011 to 2017. The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were 30-day all-cause mortality, cardiac-mortality, unplanned cardiac readmission, cardiogenic shock, heart failure, and stroke. Subgroup analysis was carried out by sex and ACS type.Of 5400 patients, 8.6% were SMuRF-less. The median follow-up time was 6.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 4.2-8.2 years). SMuRF-less patients were younger and tended to present with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). They were more likely to require inotropic support, intubation, and have cardiac arrest. At 30 days, SMuRF-less patients had higher rates of all-cause mortality, cardiac-related mortality and cardiogenic shock, but lower rates of heart failure. At 6 years, all-cause mortality was similar in both groups (18.0% versus 17.1% respectively, p = 0.631). Kaplan-Meier curves showed increased early mortality in the SMuRF-less group, but the divergence in survival curves was no longer present in the long-term. The absence of SMuRF was an independent predictor of mortality, regardless of sex or ACS type.In a multi-ethnic cohort of patients with ACS, SMuRF-less patients were observed to have higher mortality than SMuRF patients during the early stages which was attenuated over time.

摘要

大量没有标准可调节心血管风险因素(SMuRFs)的患者,如高血压、糖尿病、高胆固醇血症和吸烟,患有急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)。这些没有 SMuRF 的患者短期发病率和死亡率较高。我们在一个多民族亚洲队列中比较了没有 SMuRF 和有 SMuRF 的 ACS 患者的短期和长期结果。这是一项对 2011 年至 2017 年首次 ACS 患者的回顾性研究。主要结局是长期全因死亡率。次要结局是 30 天全因死亡率、心脏死亡率、非计划性心脏再入院、心源性休克、心力衰竭和中风。亚组分析按性别和 ACS 类型进行。在 5400 名患者中,8.6%为无 SMuRF。中位随访时间为 6.3 年(四分位距 [IQR]:4.2-8.2 年)。无 SMuRF 的患者年龄较小,且倾向于表现为 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)。他们更可能需要正性肌力支持、插管和心脏骤停。在 30 天,无 SMuRF 的患者全因死亡率、心脏相关死亡率和心源性休克发生率较高,但心力衰竭发生率较低。在 6 年时,两组全因死亡率相似(分别为 18.0%和 17.1%,p=0.631)。Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示无 SMuRF 组早期死亡率较高,但在长期随访中,生存率曲线的差异不再存在。无论性别或 ACS 类型如何,无 SMuRF 都是死亡率的独立预测因素。在 ACS 患者的多民族队列中,无 SMuRF 的患者在早期阶段的死亡率高于有 SMuRF 的患者,但随着时间的推移,这种差异逐渐减弱。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes in acute coronary syndrome patients without standard modifiable risk factors: a multi-ethnic retrospective cohort study Of 5400 asian patients.无标准可调节风险因素的急性冠脉综合征患者的长期预后:一项对 5400 名亚洲患者的多民族回顾性队列研究。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2022 Nov;54(4):569-578. doi: 10.1007/s11239-022-02704-7. Epub 2022 Sep 12.
2
Mortality in STEMI patients without standard modifiable risk factors: a sex-disaggregated analysis of SWEDEHEART registry data.非标准可调节风险因素的 STEMI 患者的死亡率:SWEDEHEART 注册研究数据的性别细分分析。
Lancet. 2021 Mar 20;397(10279):1085-1094. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00272-5. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
3
Higher mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients without standard modifiable risk factors: Results from a global meta-analysis of 1,285,722 patients.急性冠状动脉综合征患者无标准可调节风险因素时死亡率更高:来自全球 1285722 例患者的荟萃分析结果。
Int J Cardiol. 2023 Jan 15;371:432-440. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.09.062. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
4
Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A report from multicenter percutaneous coronary intervention registry.急性冠状动脉综合征患者的标准可调节心血管危险因素:多中心经皮冠状动脉介入治疗注册研究报告。
J Cardiol. 2023 Jun;81(6):571-576. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2023.01.009. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
5
Prevalence and outcomes of patients with SMuRF-less acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.SMuRF 缺失型急性冠状动脉综合征患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患病率和结局。
Open Heart. 2024 Jun 5;11(1):e002733. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002733.
6
Prognostic Outcomes in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients Without Standard Modifiable Risk Factors: A Multiethnic Study of 8,680 Asian Patients.无标准可改变危险因素的急性心肌梗死患者的预后:对8680名亚洲患者的多民族研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 29;9:869168. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.869168. eCollection 2022.
7
Infarct severity and outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients without standard modifiable risk factors - A multicenter cardiac magnetic resonance study.无标准可调节风险因素的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的梗死严重程度和结局 - 一项多中心心脏磁共振研究。
Eur J Intern Med. 2024 Jan;119:78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.08.013. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
8
Characteristics and Outcomes of Young Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Without Standard Modifiable Risk Factors.无标准可调节危险因素的年轻 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的特征和结局。
Am J Cardiol. 2023 Sep 1;202:81-89. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2023.06.045. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
9
ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Patients Without Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors-How Common Are They, and What Are Their Outcomes?无标准可调节心血管风险因素的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者——他们有多常见,其结局如何?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e013296. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013296. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
10
Mortality of patients presented with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction according to the status of standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.根据标准可改变心血管危险因素的状况,急性 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的死亡率。
Am J Med Sci. 2024 May;367(5):328-336. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2024.01.025. Epub 2024 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-invasive scoring systems of liver fibrosis predict prognosis in the cohort with myocardial infarction.肝纤维化的非侵入性评分系统可预测心肌梗死队列的预后。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 21;15(1):26499. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12583-6.
2
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist in myocardial infarction and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk reduction: a comprehensive meta-analysis of number needed to treat, efficacy and safety.胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂在心肌梗死及降低动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险中的应用:治疗所需人数、疗效及安全性的综合荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Jul 12;24(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02840-3.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison between distinct insulin resistance indices in measuring the development of hypertension: The China Health and Nutrition Survey.不同胰岛素抵抗指数在测量高血压发生发展中的比较:中国健康与营养调查
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Oct 6;9:912197. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.912197. eCollection 2022.
2
Long-Term Prognosis of Acute Myocardial Infarction Associated With Metabolic Health and Obesity Status.代谢健康与肥胖状况与急性心肌梗死的长期预后关系。
Endocr Pract. 2022 Aug;28(8):802-810. doi: 10.1016/j.eprac.2022.05.007. Epub 2022 May 30.
3
Occurrence and Risk Factors of Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients Receiving Bivalirudin as Anticoagulant During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Prospective, Multi-Center, Intensive Monitoring Study.
Long-term outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors: findings from the OPT-CAD cohort.
接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗且无标准可改变心血管危险因素的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的长期预后:OPT-CAD队列研究结果
BMC Med. 2025 Feb 24;23(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-03933-2.
4
A sex-disaggregated analysis of the prognostic value of lean type 2 diabetes mellitus in the adult population with acute myocardial infarction.成年急性心肌梗死患者中瘦型2型糖尿病预后价值的性别分层分析
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2025 Feb 7;24(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02552-0.
5
Prognostic value of serum glycated albumin in acute coronary syndrome patients without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.血清糖化白蛋白在无标准可改变心血管危险因素的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的预后价值。
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024 Nov 22;16(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01524-4.
6
Sex differences in survival following acute coronary syndrome with and without standard modifiable risk factors.伴有和不伴有标准可改变风险因素的急性冠状动脉综合征患者生存情况的性别差异。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Jun;114(6):681-689. doi: 10.1007/s00392-024-02563-7. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
7
Prognostic significance of triglyceride-glucose index in acute coronary syndrome patients without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors.无标准可调节心血管危险因素的急性冠脉综合征患者的甘油三酯-葡萄糖指数的预后意义。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Jul 23;23(1):270. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02345-5.
8
No standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in acute myocardial infarction: prevalence, pathophysiology, and prognosis.急性心肌梗死中无标准可调节心血管危险因素:患病率、病理生理学和预后。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2024 Oct;39(4):403-411. doi: 10.1007/s12928-024-01022-4. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
9
Prevalence and outcomes of patients with SMuRF-less acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.SMuRF 缺失型急性冠状动脉综合征患者行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患病率和结局。
Open Heart. 2024 Jun 5;11(1):e002733. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2024-002733.
10
Defining Outcomes in East Asian Elderly STEMI Patients Without Standard Modifiable Risk Factors.定义无标准可改变危险因素的东亚老年ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的预后
JACC Asia. 2024 Jan 2;4(1):84-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.11.001. eCollection 2024 Jan.
在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗期间接受比伐卢定作为抗凝剂的患者中药物不良反应的发生情况及危险因素:一项前瞻性、多中心、强化监测研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 29;8:781632. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.781632. eCollection 2021.
4
Long-term Prognosis in Patients With Concomitant Acute Coronary Syndrome and Aortic Stenosis.合并急性冠状动脉综合征和主动脉瓣狭窄患者的长期预后。
Can J Cardiol. 2022 Aug;38(8):1220-1227. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
5
The Association of Plant-Based Diet With Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Prospect Cohort Studies.植物性饮食与心血管疾病及死亡率的关联:前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析与系统评价
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 5;8:756810. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.756810. eCollection 2021.
6
Association of Socioeconomic Status With Risk Factor Target Achievements and Use of Secondary Prevention After Myocardial Infarction.社会经济地位与心肌梗死后危险因素目标达标及二级预防的使用之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Mar 1;4(3):e211129. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.1129.
7
Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Door-to-Balloon Time for Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - Results From the Singapore Western STEMI Network.COVID-19 大流行对直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的门球时间的影响 - 来自新加坡西部 STEMI 网络的结果。
Circ J. 2021 Jan 25;85(2):139-149. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0800. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
8
ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) Patients Without Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors-How Common Are They, and What Are Their Outcomes?无标准可调节心血管风险因素的 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者——他们有多常见,其结局如何?
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e013296. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013296. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
9
2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2019美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会心血管疾病一级预防指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Sep 10;74(10):e177-e232. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.010. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
10
Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018).心肌梗死的第四次全球定义(2018年)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 30;72(18):2231-2264. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1038. Epub 2018 Aug 25.