• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和患者照顾者对社会筛选的看法:文献综述。

Patient and Patient Caregiver Perspectives on Social Screening: A Review of the Literature.

机构信息

From the Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (EMB, EDM, BA, LMG); Joint Medical Program, University of California, Berkeley (VL); Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (MM).

出版信息

J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Feb 8;36(1):66-78. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220211R1.

DOI:10.3122/jabfm.2022.220211R1
PMID:36759136
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Health care policy and practice-level enthusiasm around social screening has emerged in the absence of a clear appreciation for how patients feel about these activities. Yet patient and caregiver perspectives should be used to establish the rationale and inform the design and implementation of social screening initiatives.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic scoping review to better understand patient and patient caregiver perspectives regarding multidomain social screening in US health care settings.

RESULTS

We identified 16 articles. Thirteen studies assessed the perspectives of patients; a partially overlapping 9 studies assessed the perspectives of adult patient caregivers. Most articles assessing the acceptability of social screening reported that patients and patient caregivers generally found it to be acceptable. Notably, there was some variation by screening approach and prior experiences in health care settings, as well as mixed findings by race/ethnicity and gender. Participants from several articles raised concerns regarding data documentation and sharing, highlighting the potential for social data to contribute to provider bias.

CONCLUSION

The themes emerging in this diverse set of largely descriptive studies warrant deeper and more rigorous exploration as social screening initiatives expand in health care settings across the United States.

摘要

背景

尽管人们尚未充分认识到患者对这些活动的感受,但医疗政策和实践层面围绕社会筛查的积极性已经出现。然而,应该利用患者和照护者的观点来确定社会筛查举措的基本原理,并为其设计和实施提供信息。

方法

我们进行了系统的范围界定审查,以更好地了解美国医疗保健环境中患者和患者照护者对多领域社会筛查的观点。

结果

我们确定了 16 篇文章。13 项研究评估了患者的观点;9 项部分重叠的研究评估了成年患者照护者的观点。评估社会筛查可接受性的大多数文章报告称,患者和患者照护者普遍认为它是可以接受的。值得注意的是,筛查方法和之前在医疗保健环境中的经历存在一些差异,种族/民族和性别也存在混合发现。一些文章的参与者对数据记录和共享表示担忧,强调社会数据有可能导致提供者偏见。

结论

这些多样化的描述性研究中出现的主题需要更深入和更严格的探索,因为社会筛查举措在美国各地的医疗保健环境中不断扩大。

相似文献

1
Patient and Patient Caregiver Perspectives on Social Screening: A Review of the Literature.患者和患者照顾者对社会筛选的看法:文献综述。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Feb 8;36(1):66-78. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220211R1.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Part II: A Qualitative Study of Social Risk Screening Acceptability in Patients and Caregivers.第二部分:患者和照护者对社会风险筛查可接受性的定性研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Dec;57(6 Suppl 1):S38-S46. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.016.
5
Improving Sexual and Gender Minority Cancer Care: Patient and Caregiver Perspectives From a Multi-Methods Pilot Study.改善性少数群体和性别少数群体的癌症护理:一项多方法试点研究中患者和护理人员的观点
Front Oncol. 2022 May 6;12:833195. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.833195. eCollection 2022.
6
"Why Do They Want to Know?": A Qualitative Assessment of Caregiver Perspectives on Social Drivers of Health Screening in Pediatric Primary Care.“他们为什么想知道?”:对儿科初级保健中健康筛查的社会驱动因素的 caregiver 观点进行定性评估。
Acad Pediatr. 2023 Mar;23(2):329-335. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
7
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
8
9
Stakeholder perspectives on social screening in US healthcare settings.美国医疗保健环境中社会筛选的利益相关者视角。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Mar 13;23(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09214-z.
10
Caregiver and Pediatric Health Care Provider Views on Social Needs Identification.照顾者和儿科保健提供者对社会需求识别的看法。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720923085. doi: 10.1177/2150132720923085.

引用本文的文献

1
Comfort With Sharing Food Insecurity Risk for Clinical Care Among Individuals With and Without a Cancer History: Findings From a National Survey.有或无癌症病史个体在临床护理中分享粮食不安全风险的舒适度:一项全国性调查的结果
AJPM Focus. 2025 Jul 24;4(5):100395. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100395. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
Perspectives on Health-Related Social Needs Screening in Primary Care Among Black and Latine Patients.黑人和拉丁裔患者初级保健中与健康相关的社会需求筛查的观点
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Aug 1;8(8):e2529538. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.29538.
3
Feasible and acceptable social drivers of health screening among patients with chronic liver disease.
慢性肝病患者健康筛查中可行且可接受的社会驱动因素。
Hepatol Commun. 2025 Jun 30;9(7). doi: 10.1097/HC9.0000000000000758. eCollection 2025 Jul 1.
4
Outreach Assessment for Social Health Needs in Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions: Qualitative Study of Patient Experience.多重慢性病患者社会健康需求的外展评估:患者体验的定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09650-z.
5
Low-Intensity Social Care and Child Acute Health Care Utilization: A Randomized Clinical Trial.低强度社会关怀与儿童急性医疗保健利用:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Apr 28. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.0484.
6
Social Risk at Individual vs Neighborhood Levels and Health Care Use in Medicaid Enrollees.医疗补助参保者中个体层面与邻里层面的社会风险及医疗保健利用情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255047. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5047.
7
LiFTS: Equitably Implementing a Social Needs Screening Program.LiFTS:公平实施社会需求筛查计划。
Hosp Pediatr. 2025 Mar 1;15(3):227-236. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2024-008019.
8
Barriers and facilitators to caregiver comfort with health-related social needs data collection in the pediatric clinical setting.儿科临床环境中照顾者在与健康相关的社会需求数据收集方面感到舒适的障碍与促进因素。
Health Serv Res. 2025 May;60 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):e14425. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14425. Epub 2024 Dec 25.
9
Caregivers' Views of a Pediatric Inpatient Intervention to Address Health-Related Social Risks.照顾者对一项针对与健康相关社会风险的儿科住院干预措施的看法。
Hosp Pediatr. 2025 Jan 1;15(1):46-56. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2024-008025.
10
Guides for facilitating the implementation and evaluation of social prescribing: lessons from the "Access to Resources in the Community" model.促进社会处方实施和评估的指南:来自“社区资源获取”模式的经验教训。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2024 Sep;44(9):397-400. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.44.9.07.