• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多重慢性病患者社会健康需求的外展评估:患者体验的定性研究

Outreach Assessment for Social Health Needs in Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions: Qualitative Study of Patient Experience.

作者信息

Ralston James D, Gleason Kathy S, Bayliss Elizabeth A, Estacio Karen, Healy Luesa, Holden Erika, McCloskey Jodi, Peterson Ilana, Shulman Lisa, Taylor-McPhail Tobie, Uratsu Connie S, Grant Richard W

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, 1730 Minor Avenue, Suite 1360, Seattle, WA, 98101-1466, USA.

Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09650-z.

DOI:10.1007/s11606-025-09650-z
PMID:40562889
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Unmet social needs are common among individuals with multiple chronic health conditions (MCC).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the acceptability of proactive outreach to assess and follow up on social health needs among patients with MCC.

DESIGN

Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews.

PARTICIPANTS

We interviewed 25 patients with 2 or more chronic health conditions in three integrated care settings in Washington, Colorado, and California that experienced proactive outreach offering assessment and follow-up for social health risks. All patients had a higher likelihood of social health risks based on a predictive model using health plan and electronic health record data. Patients received initial outreach from clinical pharmacists at the Northern California site, licensed practical nurses in primary care at the Washington site, and Community Specialists at the Colorado site.

APPROACH

Transcripts were analyzed using a mixed deductive and inductive thematic approach informed by the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability.

KEY RESULTS

Mean age across the groups was 66 years. We identified five themes common across all three healthcare sites. Participants appreciated the outreach, stating they felt understood and cared for by their providers; recognized how their social needs were intertwined with their physical and mental health; and found that uncomfortable social health conversations were easier with known healthcare providers. Assessment of social health needs and referral to community resources provided some participants with hope that their needs would be met, while others felt discouraged by prior experience. Following referral to community resources, participants had uneven experiences receiving resources to address their needs.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest proactive outreach by healthcare team members to assess and address social health needs is valued by patients with MCC despite challenges with accessing some social health resources. Future work is needed to support access to community resources and evaluate the outcomes of outreach to those with MCC who have social needs.

摘要

背景

未满足的社会需求在患有多种慢性健康状况(MCC)的个体中很常见。

目的

评估主动 outreach 以评估和跟进患有MCC的患者的社会健康需求的可接受性。

设计

使用半结构化访谈的定性研究。

参与者

我们在华盛顿、科罗拉多和加利福尼亚的三个综合护理机构中采访了25名患有两种或更多慢性健康状况的患者,这些机构经历了主动 outreach,提供对社会健康风险的评估和跟进。根据使用健康计划和电子健康记录数据的预测模型,所有患者都有更高的社会健康风险可能性。患者在北加利福尼亚站点接受临床药剂师的初次 outreach,在华盛顿站点接受初级护理中的执业护士的 outreach,在科罗拉多站点接受社区专家的 outreach。

方法

使用由可接受性理论框架指导的混合演绎和归纳主题方法对转录本进行分析。

关键结果

各组的平均年龄为66岁。我们确定了所有三个医疗保健站点共有的五个主题。参与者对outreach表示赞赏,称他们感到被提供者理解和关心;认识到他们的社会需求如何与他们的身心健康相互交织;并发现与熟悉的医疗保健提供者进行不舒服的社会健康对话更容易。对社会健康需求的评估和转介到社区资源让一些参与者有希望他们的需求会得到满足,而另一些人则因先前的经历而感到气馁。在转介到社区资源后,参与者在获得满足其需求的资源方面经历参差不齐。

结论

我们的结果表明,尽管在获取一些社会健康资源方面存在挑战,但医疗团队成员主动outreach以评估和解决社会健康需求受到患有MCC的患者的重视。未来需要开展工作以支持获取社区资源,并评估对有社会需求的患有MCC的患者进行outreach的结果。

相似文献

1
Outreach Assessment for Social Health Needs in Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions: Qualitative Study of Patient Experience.多重慢性病患者社会健康需求的外展评估:患者体验的定性研究
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09650-z.
2
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
3
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.在自闭症群体的参与下为成年自闭症患者调整安全计划。
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.“只需询问我们需要什么支持”:成年自闭症患者对社交技能培训的反馈
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Stakeholders' perceptions and experiences of factors influencing the commissioning, delivery, and uptake of general health checks: a qualitative evidence synthesis.利益相关者对影响一般健康检查的委托、提供和接受因素的看法与体验:一项定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 20;3(3):CD014796. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014796.pub2.
6
Community views on mass drug administration for soil-transmitted helminths: a qualitative evidence synthesis.社区对土壤传播蠕虫群体药物给药的看法:定性证据综合分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jun 20;6:CD015794. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015794.pub2.
7
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
8
Parents' and informal caregivers' views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence.父母及非正式照料者关于儿童常规疫苗接种沟通的观点与经历:定性证据综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD011787. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011787.pub2.
9
Feasibility study of Learning Together for Mental Health: fidelity, reach and acceptability of a whole-school intervention aiming to promote health and wellbeing in secondary schools.“共同学习促进心理健康”可行性研究:一项旨在促进中学健康与幸福的全校性干预措施的保真度、覆盖面和可接受性。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2025 Jun 18:1-36. doi: 10.3310/RTRT0202.
10
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Telephone-based social health screening by pharmacists in the nonadherent Medicare population.药剂师对 Medicare 不依从人群进行电话式社会健康筛查。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2023 Nov;29(11):1184-1192. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2023.29.11.1184.
2
Assessing the Feasibility of an Empathic Inquiry Approach to Social Needs Screening in 10 Federally Qualified Health Centers.评估在 10 家联邦合格健康中心采用同理心问询方法进行社会需求筛查的可行性。
Perm J. 2023 Dec 15;27(4):136-142. doi: 10.7812/TPP/22.178. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
3
Kaiser Permanente's Social Needs Network for Evaluation and Translation Empirical Research Agenda.
凯撒医疗集团用于评估与转化实证研究议程的社会需求网络
AJPM Focus. 2023 May 2;2(3):100101. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2023.100101. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Community-based organizations' perspectives on piloting health and social care integration in North Carolina.社区组织对北卡罗来纳州试行医疗与社会保健整合的看法。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 4;23(1):1914. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16722-4.
5
"Wanting the Best for Our Folks"-A Mixed Methods Analysis of Community Health Center Social Risk Screening Initiatives.“为我们的民众谋求最佳福祉”——社区健康中心社会风险筛查举措的混合方法分析
J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Oct 11;36(5):817-831. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2023.230099R1. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
6
A Qualitative Study of Perceptions and Preferences Regarding Social and Behavioral Risk Screening Among Primary Care Patients.一项关于初级保健患者对社会和行为风险筛查的认知和偏好的定性研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Nov;38(14):3171-3179. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08344-8. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
7
Assessing Implementation of Social Screening Within US Health Care Settings: A Systematic Scoping Review.评估美国医疗保健环境中社会筛查的实施情况:系统范围综述。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Aug 9;36(4):626-649. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220401R1. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
8
Addressing Health-Related Social Needs Via Community Resources: Lessons From Accountable Health Communities.通过社区资源解决与健康相关的社会需求:问责制健康社区的经验教训。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Jun;42(6):832-840. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01507. Epub 2023 May 17.
9
Patient and Patient Caregiver Perspectives on Social Screening: A Review of the Literature.患者和患者照顾者对社会筛选的看法:文献综述。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Feb 8;36(1):66-78. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220211R1.
10
Conceptualizing the effective mechanisms of a social needs case management program shown to reduce hospital use: a qualitative study.概念化社会需求个案管理计划的有效机制,该计划已被证明可以减少医院使用:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 26;22(1):1585. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08979-z.