• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Correction: How strong should my anchor be for estimating group and individual level meaningful change? A simulation study assessing anchor correlation strength and the impact of sample size, distribution of change scores and methodology on establishing a true meaningful change threshold.

作者信息

Griffiths Pip, Sims Joel, Williams Abi, Williamson Nicola, Cella David, Brohan Elaine, Cocks Kim

机构信息

IQVIA, Patient Centered Endpoints, Reading, UK.

Adelphi Values, Patient-Centered Outcomes, Bollington, Cheshire, UK.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2023 May;32(5):1265. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03356-7.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-023-03356-7
PMID:36759380
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Correction: How strong should my anchor be for estimating group and individual level meaningful change? A simulation study assessing anchor correlation strength and the impact of sample size, distribution of change scores and methodology on establishing a true meaningful change threshold.更正：对于评估组水平和个体水平的有意义变化，我的锚定应多强？一项模拟研究，评估锚定相关强度以及样本量、变化分数分布和方法对建立真正有意义变化阈值的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2023 May;32(5):1265. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03356-7.
2
How strong should my anchor be for estimating group and individual level meaningful change? A simulation study assessing anchor correlation strength and the impact of sample size, distribution of change scores and methodology on establishing a true meaningful change threshold.用于估计群组和个体水平有意义变化的锚应该有多强？一项模拟研究评估了锚相关性强度，以及样本量、变化分数分布和方法对建立真实有意义变化阈值的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2023 May;32(5):1255-1264. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03286-w. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
3
Comparison of anchor-based methods for estimating thresholds of meaningful within-patient change using simulated PROMIS PF 20a data under various joint distribution characteristic conditions.基于锚定的方法在不同联合分布特征条件下模拟 PROMIS PF 20a 数据估计有意义的患者内变化阈值的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2023 May;32(5):1277-1293. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03285-x. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
4
What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?全膝关节置换术后 WOMAC 指数的最小临床重要差异是多少？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):2005-2014. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000444.
5
Determining Thresholds for Meaningful Change for the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) Total and Item-Specific Scores in Chronic Migraine.确定慢性偏头痛头痛影响测试（HIT-6）总分和项目特异性评分的有意义变化阈值。
Headache. 2020 Oct;60(9):2003-2013. doi: 10.1111/head.13946. Epub 2020 Aug 30.
6
The challenges inherent with anchor-based approaches to the interpretation of important change in clinical outcome assessments.基于锚定的方法在解释临床结局评估中重要变化时所固有的挑战。
Qual Life Res. 2023 May;32(5):1239-1246. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03297-7. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
7
Validity and Clinically Meaningful Changes in the Psychosexual Daily Questionnaire and Derogatis Interview for Sexual Function Assessment: Results From the Testosterone Trials.《性心理学日常问卷和性功能评估德罗加蒂斯访谈的有效性和临床有意义变化：来自睾酮试验的结果》
J Sex Med. 2018 Jul;15(7):997-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.05.008.
8
How scoring limits the usability of minimal important differences (MIDs) as responder definition (RD): an exemplary demonstration using EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales.评分如何限制了最小有意义差异 (MIDs) 作为反应定义 (RD) 的可用性：使用 EORTC QLQ-C30 子量表的示范性演示。
Qual Life Res. 2023 May;32(5):1247-1253. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03181-4. Epub 2022 Jul 9.
9
Minimal important improvement thresholds for the six-minute walk test in a knee arthroplasty cohort: triangulation of anchor- and distribution-based methods.膝关节置换术队列中六分钟步行测试的最小重要改善阈值：基于锚定法和分布法的三角测量
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Sep 13;17(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1249-7.
10
Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life.定义健康相关生活质量中具有临床意义的变化。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2003 May;56(5):395-407. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(03)00044-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinically meaningful change threshold estimates of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network-Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast Cancer Symptom Index (NFBSI-16).美国国家综合癌症网络-癌症治疗功能评估-乳腺癌症状指数（NFBSI-16）的有效性、可靠性、反应性和临床有意义的变化阈值评估。
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024 Aug 15;8(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s41687-024-00776-y.