• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为尼日利亚的物理治疗师制定分层护理实施的定制干预策略:一项德尔菲研究。

Developing tailored intervention strategies for implementation of stratified care to low back pain with physiotherapists in Nigeria: a Delphi study.

机构信息

Therapeutic Sciences, Trier University of Applied Sciences, Trier, Germany.

Institute of Family Medicine, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 9;23(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09123-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-023-09123-1
PMID:36759830
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9909884/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stratified care approach involving use of the STarT-Back tool to optimise care for patients with low back pain is gaining widespread attention in western countries. However, adoption and implementation of this approach in low-and-middle-income countries will be restricted by context-specific factors that need to be addressed. This study aimed to develop with physiotherapists, tailored intervention strategies for the implementation of stratified care for patients with low back pain.

METHODS

A two-round web-based Delphi survey was conducted among purposively sampled physiotherapists with a minimum of three years of clinical experience, with post-graduation certification or specialists. Thirty statements on barriers and enablers for implementation were extracted from the qualitative phase. Statements were rated by a Delphi panel with additional open-ended feedback. After each Delphi round, participants received feedback which informed their subsequent responses. Additional qualitative feedback were analysed using qualitative content analysis. The criteria for consensus and stability were pre-determined using percentage agreement (≥ 75%), median value (≥ 4), Inter-quartile range (≤ 1), and Wilcoxon matched-pairs test respectively.

RESULTS

Participants in the first round were 139 and 125 of them completed the study, yielding a response rate of 90%. Participants were aged 35.2 (SD6.6) years, and 55 (39.6%) were female. Consensus was achieved in 25/30 statements. Wilcoxon's test showed stability in responses after the 5 statements failed to reach consensus: 'translate the STarT-Back Tool to pidgin language' 71% (p = 0.76), 'begin implementation with government hospitals' 63% (p = 0.11), 'share knowledge with traditional bone setters' 35% (p = 0.67), 'get second opinion on clinician's advice' 63% (p = 0.24) and 'carry out online consultations' 65% (p = 0.41). Four statements strengthened by additional qualitative data achieved the highest consensus: 'patient education' (96%), 'quality improvement appraisals' (96%), 'undergraduate training on psychosocial care' (96%) and 'patient-clinician communication' (95%).

CONCLUSION

There was concordance of opinion that patients should be educated to correct misplaced expectations and proper time for communication is vital to implementation. This communication should be learned at undergraduate level, and for already qualified clinicians, quality improvement appraisals are key to sustained and effective care. These recommendations provide a framework for future research on monitored implementation of stratified care in middle-income countries.

摘要

背景

分层护理方法涉及使用 STarT-Back 工具来优化对腰痛患者的护理,这种方法在西方国家越来越受到关注。然而,在中低收入国家采用和实施这种方法将受到需要解决的特定于背景的因素的限制。本研究旨在与物理治疗师一起制定针对腰痛患者分层护理实施的定制干预策略。

方法

对具有至少三年临床经验、毕业后认证或专科医生的物理治疗师进行两轮基于网络的 Delphi 调查。从定性阶段中提取了 30 条关于实施障碍和促进因素的陈述。Delphi 小组对陈述进行了评分,并附有额外的开放式反馈。在每一轮 Delphi 之后,参与者都会收到反馈,这将为他们的后续回复提供信息。使用定性内容分析对额外的定性反馈进行分析。使用百分比一致性(≥75%)、中位数(≥4)、四分位距(≤1)和 Wilcoxon 匹配对检验分别预先确定了共识和稳定性的标准。

结果

第一轮的参与者为 139 人,其中 125 人完成了研究,应答率为 90%。参与者的年龄为 35.2(6.6)岁,其中 55 人(39.6%)为女性。30 条陈述中有 25 条达成共识。Wilcoxon 检验表明,在 5 条陈述未能达成共识后,反应保持稳定:“将 STarT-Back 工具翻译成洋泾浜语言”71%(p=0.76),“从公立医院开始实施”63%(p=0.11),“与传统整骨师分享知识”35%(p=0.67),“对临床医生的建议进行第二次诊断”63%(p=0.24)和“进行在线咨询”65%(p=0.41)。四项通过额外定性数据得到加强的陈述达到了最高共识:“患者教育”(96%)、“质量改进评估”(96%)、“本科阶段的社会心理保健培训”(96%)和“医患沟通”(95%)。

结论

意见一致认为,应教育患者纠正错误的期望,适当的沟通时间对于实施至关重要。这种沟通应该在本科阶段学习,对于已经合格的临床医生,质量改进评估是持续有效的护理的关键。这些建议为在中等收入国家监测分层护理实施的未来研究提供了框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/417f/9909884/9e8d225d18b3/12913_2023_9123_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/417f/9909884/ee2ec5093217/12913_2023_9123_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/417f/9909884/9e8d225d18b3/12913_2023_9123_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/417f/9909884/ee2ec5093217/12913_2023_9123_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/417f/9909884/9e8d225d18b3/12913_2023_9123_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing tailored intervention strategies for implementation of stratified care to low back pain with physiotherapists in Nigeria: a Delphi study.为尼日利亚的物理治疗师制定分层护理实施的定制干预策略:一项德尔菲研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 9;23(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09123-1.
2
Patients' and physiotherapists' perspectives on implementing a tailored stratified treatment approach for low back pain in Nigeria: a qualitative study.患者和物理治疗师对在尼日利亚实施针对腰痛的个体化分层治疗方法的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 20;12(6):e059736. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059736.
3
Development of a low back pain care pathway in an academic hospital system: results of a consensus process.在学术医院系统中开发腰痛护理路径:共识过程的结果。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 3;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-04492-z.
4
Consensus on the exercise and dosage variables of an exercise training programme for chronic non-specific neck pain: protocol for an international e-Delphi study.慢性非特异性颈痛运动训练方案的运动和剂量变量共识:一项国际电子 Delphi 研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 May 15;10(5):e037656. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037656.
5
Musculoskeletal practitioners' perceptions of contextual factors that may influence chronic low back pain outcomes: a modified Delphi study.肌肉骨骼从业者对可能影响慢性下背痛结局的背景因素的看法:一项改良德尔菲研究。
Chiropr Man Therap. 2023 Apr 5;31(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12998-023-00482-4.
6
Clinical indicators to identify neuropathic pain in low back related leg pain: a modified Delphi study.识别腰腿痛相关性神经病理性疼痛的临床指标:一项改良德尔菲研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Sep 8;21(1):601. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03600-y.
7
Barriers and facilitators to providing undergraduate physiotherapy clinical education in the primary care setting: a three-round Delphi study.在初级保健环境中提供本科物理治疗临床教育的障碍与促进因素:三轮德尔菲研究
Physiotherapy. 2014 Mar;100(1):14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
8
One step at a time. Shaping consensus on research priorities and terminology in telehealth in musculoskeletal pain: an international modified e-Delphi study.一步一个脚印。在肌肉骨骼疼痛的远程医疗研究重点和术语方面达成共识:一项国际改良电子德尔菲研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Oct 3;24(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06866-0.
9
Physiotherapists' views of implementing a stratified treatment approach for patients with low back pain in Germany: a qualitative study.德国物理治疗师对为腰痛患者实施分层治疗方法的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Mar 27;18(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-2991-3.
10
360-degree Delphi: addressing sociotechnical challenges of healthcare IT.360 度德尔菲法:应对医疗信息技术的社会技术挑战。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1071-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Traditional bone setting in Nigeria from the perspectives of patients and physiotherapists- clinical insights for low back pain management.从患者和物理治疗师的角度看尼日利亚的传统正骨疗法——腰痛管理的临床见解
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2025 Jul 3;25(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12906-025-04966-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Perspectives and experiences of physiotherapists and general practitioners in the use of the STarT Back Tool: a review and meta-synthesis.物理治疗师和全科医生使用 STarT Back Tool 的观点和经验:综述和荟萃分析。
J Prim Health Care. 2022 Jun;14(2):164-172. doi: 10.1071/HC21069.
2
Patients' and physiotherapists' perspectives on implementing a tailored stratified treatment approach for low back pain in Nigeria: a qualitative study.患者和物理治疗师对在尼日利亚实施针对腰痛的个体化分层治疗方法的看法:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 20;12(6):e059736. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059736.
3
Reporting guidelines for Delphi techniques in health sciences: A methodological review.
德尔菲技术在健康科学中的报告指南:方法学综述。
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Aug;172:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.04.025. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
4
Nigerian physiotherapists' knowledge, current practice and perceptions of their role for promoting physical activity: A cross-sectional survey.尼日利亚物理治疗师对促进身体活动的知识、当前实践和认知:一项横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2022 May 10;17(5):e0266765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266765. eCollection 2022.
5
Oxygen-Ozone Therapy for Reducing Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines Serum Levels in Musculoskeletal and Temporomandibular Disorders: A Comprehensive Review.臭氧-氧气疗法在降低肌肉骨骼和颞下颌关节紊乱相关促炎细胞因子血清水平中的应用:全面综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Feb 25;23(5):2528. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052528.
6
Expert consensus on the minimum clinical standards of practice for Nigerian physiotherapists working in intensive care units: A modified Delphi study.尼日利亚在重症监护病房工作的物理治疗师最低临床实践标准专家共识:一项改良德尔菲研究。
Afr J Thorac Crit Care Med. 2021 Oct 4;27(3). doi: 10.7196/AJTCCM.2021.v27i3.137. eCollection 2021.
7
Prevalence and correlates of psychological distress amongst healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: An online survey.新冠疫情期间医护人员心理困扰的患病率及其相关因素:一项在线调查。
S Afr J Psychiatr. 2021 Jul 29;27:1617. doi: 10.4102/sajpsychiatry.v27i0.1617. eCollection 2021.
8
Management approach combining prognostic screening and targeted treatment for patients with low back pain compared with standard physiotherapy: A systematic review & meta-analysis.与标准物理治疗相比,针对腰痛患者的预后筛查与靶向治疗相结合的管理方法:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Musculoskeletal Care. 2021 Dec;19(4):436-456. doi: 10.1002/msc.1541. Epub 2021 Mar 14.
9
Neuropathic Pain and Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of International Guidelines.神经性疼痛与康复:国际指南的系统评价
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jan 5;11(1):74. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11010074.
10
Patients' Experiences About Exercise Prescription and Education in the Physiotherapy Management of Nonspecific Low-Back Pain.患者在非特异性下腰痛物理治疗管理中对运动处方和教育的体验
J Patient Exp. 2020 Dec;7(6):1458-1465. doi: 10.1177/2374373520968997. Epub 2020 Nov 2.