Institute of Nursing Science, Department Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Bernoullistrasse 28, 4056, Basel, Switzerland.
Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 9;23(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09146-8.
Implementation fidelity assesses the degree to which an intervention is delivered as it should be. Fidelity helps to determine if the outcome(s) of an intervention are attributed to the intervention itself or to a failure of its implementation. Little is known about how fidelity impacts the intended outcome(s) and what elements or moderators can affect the fidelity trajectory over time. We exemplify the meaning of implementation fidelity with INTERCARE, a nurse-led care model that was implemented in eleven Swiss nursing homes (NHs) and showed effectiveness in reducing unplanned hospital transfers. INTERCARE comprises six core elements, including advance care planning and tools to support inter- and interprofessional communication, which were introduced with carefully developed implementation strategies.
A mixed-methods convergent/triangulation design was used to investigate the influence of implementation fidelity on unplanned transfers. A fidelity questionnaire measuring the degree of fidelity to INTERCARE's core components was fielded at four time points in the participating NHs. Two-monthly meetings were conducted with NHs (September 2018-January 2020) and structured notes were used to determine moderators affecting fidelity (e.g., participant responsiveness). We used the fidelity scores and generalized linear mixed models to analyze the quantitative data. The Framework method was used for the qualitative analysis. The quantitative and qualitative findings were integrated using triangulation.
A higher overall fidelity score showed a decreasing rate of unplanned hospital transfers post-intervention (OR: 0.65 (CI = 0.43-0.99), p = 0.047). A higher fidelity score to advance care planning was associated with lower unplanned transfers (OR = 0.24 (CI 0.13-0.44), p = < 0.001) and a lower fidelity score for communication tools (e.g., ISBAR) to higher rates in unplanned transfers (OR = 1.69 (CI 1.30-2.19), p = < 0.003). In-house physicians with a collaborative approach and staff's perceived need for nurses working in extended roles, were important moderators to achieve and sustain high fidelity.
Implementation fidelity is challenging to measure and report, especially in complex interventions, yet is crucial to better understand how such interventions may be tailored for scale-up. This study provides both a detailed description of how fidelity can be measured and which ingredients highly contributed to reducing unplanned NH transfers.
The INTERCARE study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov Protocol Record NCT03590470.
实施保真度评估干预措施的实施程度。保真度有助于确定干预措施的结果是归因于干预本身还是归因于干预实施的失败。人们对保真度如何影响预期结果以及哪些因素或调节剂会随时间影响保真度轨迹知之甚少。我们以 INTERCARE 为例来说明实施保真度的含义,INTERCARE 是一种由护士主导的护理模式,已在瑞士的十一家疗养院实施,并显示出减少非计划性医院转院的效果。INTERCARE 包含六个核心要素,包括预先护理计划和支持跨专业和跨专业沟通的工具,这些要素是通过精心制定的实施策略引入的。
采用混合方法(convergent/triangulation)设计,调查实施保真度对非计划性转院的影响。在参与的疗养院中,在四个时间点上使用了一份 fidelity 问卷来衡量对 INTERCARE 核心要素的保真度程度。2018 年 9 月至 2020 年 1 月期间,与疗养院举行了两次每月一次的会议,并使用结构化笔记来确定影响保真度的调节剂(例如,参与者的响应性)。我们使用 fidelity 评分和广义线性混合模型来分析定量数据。采用框架方法进行定性分析。使用三角测量法整合定量和定性结果。
更高的整体保真度评分表明干预后非计划性医院转院的减少率(OR:0.65(CI = 0.43-0.99),p = 0.047)。更高的预先护理计划保真度评分与较低的非计划性转院率相关(OR = 0.24(CI 0.13-0.44),p < 0.001),而沟通工具(如 ISBAR)的保真度评分较低则与较高的非计划性转院率相关(OR = 1.69(CI 1.30-2.19),p < 0.003)。具有协作方法的内部医生和员工对扩大护士角色的需求是实现和维持高保真度的重要调节剂。
实施保真度难以衡量和报告,尤其是在复杂的干预措施中,但对于更好地理解如何针对此类干预措施进行调整以实现规模扩大至关重要。本研究详细描述了如何衡量保真度,以及哪些成分对降低非计划性 NH 转院率有很大贡献。
INTERCARE 研究在 clinicaltrials.gov 注册,协议记录号为 NCT03590470。