• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预后良好的弥漫性轴索损伤患者的认知障碍

Cognitive impairment in diffuse axonal injury patients with favorable outcome.

作者信息

Chen Weiliang, Yao Chunyu, Li Shengwen, Huang Hongguang, Zhu Zujian, Chen Rui, Su Wen, Huang Xiao, Xu Lisheng, Sun Kaijie, Song Jiannan, Jiang Rongcai, Wang Guanjun

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Haining People's Hospital, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China.

The Second Department of Orthopaedics, Haining People's Hospital, Haining, Zhejiang, China.

出版信息

Front Neurosci. 2023 Jan 25;17:1077858. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1077858. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fnins.2023.1077858
PMID:36761409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9905128/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Traumatic brain injury (TBI), especially the severe TBI are often followed by persistent cognitive sequalae, including decision-making difficulties, reduced neural processing speed and memory deficits. Diffuse axonal injury (DAI) is classified as one of the severe types of TBI. Part of DAI patients are marginalized from social life due to cognitive impairment, even if they are rated as favorable outcome. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the specific type and severity of cognitive impairment in DAI patients with favorable outcome.

METHODS

The neurocognition of 46 DAI patients with favorable outcome was evaluated by the Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic (MoCA-BC), and the differences in the domains of cognitive impairment caused by different grades of DAI were analyzed after data conversion of scores of nine cognitive domains of MoCA-BC by Pearson correlation analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 46 DAI patients with favorable outcome, eight had normal cognitive function (MoCA-BC ≥ 26), and 38 had cognitive impairment (MoCA-BC < 26). The MoCA-BC scores were positively correlated with pupillary light reflex ( = 0.361, = 0.014), admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ( = 0.402, = 0.006), and years of education ( = 0.581, < 0.001). Return of consciousness ( = -0.753, < 0.001), Marshall CT ( = -0.328, = 0.026), age ( = -0.654, < 0.001), and DAI grade ( = -0.403, = 0.006) were found to be negatively correlated with the MoCA-BC scores. In patients with DAI grade 1, the actually deducted scores (Ads) of memory ( = 0.838, < 0.001), abstraction ( = 0.843, < 0.001), and calculation ( = 0.782, < 0.001) were most related to the Ads of MoCA-BC. The Ads of nine cognitive domains and MoCA-BC were all proved to be correlated, among patients with DAI grade 2. However, In the DAI grade 3 patients, the highest correlation with the Ads of MoCA-BC were the Ads of memory ( = 0.904, < 0.001), calculation ( = 0.799, = 0.006), orientation ( = 0.801, = 0.005), and executive function ( = 0.869, = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

DAI patients with favorable outcome may still be plagued by cognitive impairment, and different grades of DAI cause different domains of cognitive impairment.

摘要

背景与目的

创伤性脑损伤(TBI),尤其是重度TBI,常伴有持续性认知后遗症,包括决策困难、神经处理速度降低和记忆缺陷。弥漫性轴索损伤(DAI)被归类为重度TBI类型之一。部分DAI患者即使被评定为预后良好,也因认知障碍而被社会生活边缘化。本研究的目的是阐明预后良好的DAI患者认知障碍的具体类型和严重程度。

方法

采用中文版蒙特利尔认知评估基础量表(MoCA-BC)对46例预后良好的DAI患者进行神经认知评估,并通过Pearson相关分析对MoCA-BC九个认知领域的得分进行数据转换后,分析不同等级DAI所致认知障碍领域的差异。

结果

在46例预后良好的DAI患者中,8例认知功能正常(MoCA-BC≥26),38例有认知障碍(MoCA-BC<26)。MoCA-BC得分与瞳孔对光反射(r = 0.361,P = 0.014)、入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分(r = 0.402,P = 0.006)和受教育年限(r = 0.581,P<0.001)呈正相关。意识恢复情况(r = -0.753,P<0.001)、Marshall CT分级(r = -0.328,P = 0.026)、年龄(r = -0.654,P<0.001)和DAI分级(r = -0.403,P = 0.006)与MoCA-BC得分呈负相关。在1级DAI患者中,记忆(r = 0.838,P<0.001)、抽象思维(r = 0.843,P<0.001)和计算(r = 0.782,P<0.001)的实际扣分与MoCA-BC的实际扣分最相关。在2级DAI患者中,九个认知领域的实际扣分与MoCA-BC均被证明相关。然而,在3级DAI患者中,与MoCA-BC实际扣分相关性最高的是记忆(r = 0.904,P<0.001)、计算(r = 0.799,P = 0.006)、定向力(r = 0.801,P = 0.005)和执行功能(r = 0.869,P = 0.001)的实际扣分。

结论

预后良好的DAI患者仍可能受到认知障碍的困扰,不同等级的DAI导致不同领域的认知障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/056c/9905128/304b953fe766/fnins-17-1077858-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/056c/9905128/fe59c24a1959/fnins-17-1077858-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/056c/9905128/7b1ef6d6a9b5/fnins-17-1077858-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/056c/9905128/304b953fe766/fnins-17-1077858-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/056c/9905128/fe59c24a1959/fnins-17-1077858-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/056c/9905128/7b1ef6d6a9b5/fnins-17-1077858-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/056c/9905128/304b953fe766/fnins-17-1077858-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Cognitive impairment in diffuse axonal injury patients with favorable outcome.预后良好的弥漫性轴索损伤患者的认知障碍
Front Neurosci. 2023 Jan 25;17:1077858. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1077858. eCollection 2023.
2
Prognostic Significance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Diffuse Axonal Injuries: Analysis of Outcomes and Review of Literature.磁共振成像在检测弥漫性轴索损伤中的预后意义:结果分析及文献复习。
Neurol India. 2022 Nov-Dec;70(6):2371-2377. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.364066.
3
Diffuse Axonal Injury Grade on Early MRI is Associated with Worse Outcome in Children with Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.早期 MRI 上弥漫性轴索损伤分级与中重度创伤性脑损伤患儿的预后不良相关。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Apr;36(2):492-503. doi: 10.1007/s12028-021-01336-8. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
4
Exploring Serum Biomarkers for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury探索轻度创伤性脑损伤的血清生物标志物
5
Evaluation of extent and pattern of neurocognitive functions in mild and moderate traumatic brain injury patients by using Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score as a screening tool: An observational study from India.采用蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA)评分作为筛查工具评估轻度和中度创伤性脑损伤患者的神经认知功能的程度和模式:来自印度的一项观察性研究。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2019 Mar;41:60-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
6
Prevalence and impact of diffuse axonal injury in patients with moderate and severe head injury: a cohort study of early magnetic resonance imaging findings and 1-year outcome.中度和重度颅脑损伤患者弥漫性轴索损伤的患病率和影响:一项早期磁共振成像表现和 1 年转归的队列研究。
J Neurosurg. 2010 Sep;113(3):556-63. doi: 10.3171/2009.9.JNS09626.
7
The ratio of serum neuron-specific enolase level to admission glasgow coma scale score is associated with diffuse axonal injury in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶水平与入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的比值与中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的弥漫性轴索损伤相关。
Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 1;13:887818. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.887818. eCollection 2022.
8
Prognosis of diffuse axonal injury with traumatic brain injury.弥漫性轴索损伤伴脑外伤的预后。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018 Jul;85(1):155-159. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001852.
9
Comparative study of two Chinese versions of Montreal Cognitive Assessment for Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment.用于筛查轻度认知障碍的两种中文版蒙特利尔认知评估量表的比较研究
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2021 Jan-Feb;28(1):88-93. doi: 10.1080/23279095.2019.1602530. Epub 2019 Apr 23.
10
Cognitive sequelae of diffuse axonal injury.弥漫性轴索损伤的认知后遗症。
Arch Neurol. 2006 Mar;63(3):418-24. doi: 10.1001/archneur.63.3.418.

引用本文的文献

1
A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, multi-centre, phase III study of MLC901 (NeuroAiDTMII) for the treatment of cognitive impairment after mild traumatic brain injury.一项关于MLC901(NeuroAiDTMII)治疗轻度创伤性脑损伤后认知障碍的双盲、安慰剂对照、随机、多中心III期研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 10;20(7):e0310229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310229. eCollection 2025.
2
Dynamic changes in neuron-specific enolase level to glasgow coma scale score ratio predict long-term neurological function of diffuse axonal injury patients.神经元特异性烯醇化酶水平与格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分比值的动态变化可预测弥漫性轴索损伤患者的长期神经功能。
BMC Neurol. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04116-5.

本文引用的文献

1
The ratio of serum neuron-specific enolase level to admission glasgow coma scale score is associated with diffuse axonal injury in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury.血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶水平与入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分的比值与中重度创伤性脑损伤患者的弥漫性轴索损伤相关。
Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 1;13:887818. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.887818. eCollection 2022.
2
Mini-Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment as Tools for Following Cognitive Changes in Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative Participants.简易精神状态检查和蒙特利尔认知评估在阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议参与者认知变化随访中的作用。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;90(1):263-270. doi: 10.3233/JAD-220397.
3
Montreal Cognitive Assessment for Evaluating Cognitive Impairment in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review.
用于评估蛛网膜下腔出血认知障碍的蒙特利尔认知评估:一项系统评价
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 10;11(16):4679. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164679.
4
Vascular Cognitive Impairment After Mild Stroke: Connectomic Insights, Neuroimaging, and Knowledge Translation.轻度中风后的血管性认知障碍:连接组学见解、神经影像学及知识转化
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jul 7;16:905979. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.905979. eCollection 2022.
5
Cerebral blood flow network differences correlated with cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury.轻度创伤性脑损伤中脑血流网络差异与认知障碍相关。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jul 22;16:969971. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.969971. eCollection 2022.
6
Allometry in the corpus callosum in neonates: Sexual dimorphism.新生儿胼胝体的生长比例:性别二态性。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2022 Oct 15;43(15):4609-4619. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25977. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
7
Longitudinal assessment of magnetization transfer ratio, brain volume, and cognitive functions in diffuse axonal injury.弥散性轴索损伤中磁化传递率、脑容量和认知功能的纵向评估。
Brain Behav. 2022 Mar;12(3):e2490. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2490. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
8
Cognitive-Linguistic outcome in moderate to severe diffuse axonal injury and association with fatigue.中重度弥漫性轴索损伤的认知-语言转归及其与疲劳的关联
Brain Inj. 2021 Dec 6;35(14):1674-1681. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2021.2012824. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
9
Diffuse Axonal Injury: Clinical Prognostic Factors, Molecular Experimental Models and the Impact of the Trauma Related Oxidative Stress. An Extensive Review Concerning Milestones and Advances.弥漫性轴索损伤:临床预后因素、分子实验模型以及创伤相关氧化应激的影响。关于里程碑和进展的广泛综述。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Oct 8;22(19):10865. doi: 10.3390/ijms221910865.
10
Toward a Comprehensive Delineation of White Matter Tract-Related Deformation.迈向对白质束相关变形的全面描绘。
J Neurotrauma. 2021 Dec;38(23):3260-3278. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0195. Epub 2021 Nov 11.