Veraksa Aleksander N, Sidneva Anastasia N, Aslanova Margarita S, Plotnikova Valeria A
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Psychol Russ. 2022 Dec 30;15(4):62-82. doi: 10.11621/pir.2022.0405. eCollection 2022.
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown the great importance of early mathematical development as a predictor of subsequent success, which poses the question of how to organize preschool mathematical education with a view to the children's age characteristics, including their cognitive development. In other words, mathematical concepts and actions should be formed with the help of teaching resources appropriate to the child's development. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of three teaching resources (examples, models, and symbols) in formation of the concept of magnitude in older preschoolers (ages 6-7) with different levels of executive function. DESIGN: Four training programs (with 15 twenty-minute lessons each) were developed and conducted in a formative experiment for older preschoolers with different levels of development of executive functions. The lessons addressed the concept of magnitude (length, area, volume), using different types of teaching resources: exemplars (in traditional and game variants), models, and symbols. The total sample of 116 subjects (44% boys) was divided into 4 groups for each of the programs, plus a control group in which no sessions were conducted. The groups were equalized according to the initial level of development of concepts of magnitude and the level of development of executive functions. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in the quality of mastery of the concept of magnitude in three experimental groups ("symbolic," "traditional," and "traditional with imaginary characters") compared with the control group. The formative effect of the "model-building" program showed no significant differences from the effect of the child's natural development (the control group). We also showed that children with a low level of regulation learned mathematical concepts more effectively with the "symbolic" program; children with a medium level of regulation with the "symbolic" and any variant of the "traditional" program; and children with a high level of regulation with the "symbolic" and "model-building" programs. CONCLUSION: The findings underline the importance of both the type of teaching resources used and the level of development of voluntary regulation, when teaching mathematics to preschoolers.
背景:研究表明早期数学发展作为后续成功的预测指标具有极其重要的意义,这就引发了一个问题,即如何根据儿童的年龄特征,包括他们的认知发展,来组织学前数学教育。换句话说,数学概念和行为应该借助适合儿童发展的教学资源来形成。 目的:确定三种教学资源(实例、模型和符号)在不同执行功能水平的大龄学前儿童(6 - 7岁)中形成量的概念的有效性。 设计:针对不同执行功能发展水平的大龄学前儿童开展了一项形成性实验,开发并实施了四个培训项目(每个项目有15节20分钟的课程)。这些课程使用不同类型的教学资源(实例(传统形式和游戏形式)、模型和符号)来讲解量的概念(长度、面积、体积)。116名受试者(44%为男孩)的总样本被分为4组,每组对应一个项目,外加一个未进行课程教学的对照组。根据量概念的初始发展水平和执行功能的发展水平对各组进行了均衡处理。 结果:与对照组相比,三个实验组(“符号组”、“传统组”和“带虚拟角色的传统组”)在量概念掌握质量上有统计学意义的提高。“模型构建”项目的形成性效果与儿童自然发展(对照组)的效果无显著差异。我们还表明,调节水平低的儿童通过“符号”项目能更有效地学习数学概念;调节水平中等的儿童通过“符号”项目和任何一种“传统”项目变体学习效果较好;调节水平高的儿童通过“符号”项目和“模型构建”项目学习效果较好。 结论:研究结果强调了在向学前儿童教授数学时,所使用的教学资源类型和自主调节发展水平的重要性。
Front Psychol. 2022-11-24
Child Dev. 2017-1-20
Annu Rev Psychol. 2012-9-27
Dev Psychol. 2007-11