Barbiero Sara, Rink Alexandra, Matteucci Fabrizio, Fedele David, Paiar Fabiola, Pasqualetti Francesco, Avanzo Michele
Medical Physics Division, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico, Aviano, Italy; Specialty School in Medical Physics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Radiation Physics Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Med Dosim. 2016;41(4):334-338. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Oct 15.
To report on single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (RT) (SBRT) with flattening filter (FF)-free (FFF) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for lung cancer and to compare dosimetric results with VMAT with FF.
Overall, 25 patients were treated with 6-MV FFF VMAT (Varian TrueBeam STx LINAC) to a prescribed dose of 24Gy in a single fraction. Treatment plans were recreated using FF VMAT. Dose-volume indices, monitor units (MU), and treatment times were compared between FFF and FF VMAT techniques.
Dose constraints to PTV, spinal cord, and lungs were reached in FFF and FF plans. In FFF plans, average conformity index was 1.13 (95% CI: 1.07 to1.38). Maximum doses to spinal cord, heart, esophagus, and trachea were 2.9Gy (95% CI: 0.4 to 6.7Gy), 0.8Gy (95% CI: 0 to 3.6Gy), 3.3Gy (95% CI: 0.02 to 13.9Gy), and 1.5Gy (95% CI: 0 to 4.9Gy), respectively. Average V7Gy, V7.4Gy, and mean dose to the healthy lung were 126.5cc (95% CI: 41.3 to 248.9cc), 107.3cc (95% CI: 18.7 to 232.8cc), and 1.1Gy (95% CI: 0.3 to 2.2Gy), respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in dosimetric results and MU between FF and FFF treatments. Treatment time was reduced by an average factor of 2.31 (95% CI: 2.15 to 2.43) from FF treatments to FFF, and the difference was statistically significant.
FFF VMAT for lung SBRT provides equivalent dosimetric results to the target and organs at risk as FF VMAT while significantly reducing treatment time.
报告采用无均整器(FFF)容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)技术进行单次立体定向体部放疗(RT)(SBRT)治疗肺癌的情况,并将剂量学结果与采用均整器(FF)的VMAT技术进行比较。
总共25例患者接受了6兆伏FFF VMAT(瓦里安TrueBeam STx直线加速器)单次24Gy的处方剂量治疗。使用FF VMAT重新创建治疗计划。比较了FFF和FF VMAT技术之间的剂量体积指数、监测单位(MU)和治疗时间。
FFF和FF计划均达到了对计划靶体积(PTV)、脊髓和肺的剂量限制。在FFF计划中,平均适形指数为1.13(95%置信区间:1.07至1.38)。脊髓、心脏、食管和气管的最大剂量分别为2.9Gy(95%置信区间:0.4至6.7Gy)、0.8Gy(95%置信区间:0至3.6Gy)、3.3Gy(95%置信区间:0.02至13.9Gy)和1.5Gy(95%置信区间:0至4.9Gy)。健康肺的平均V7Gy、V7.4Gy和平均剂量分别为126.5立方厘米(95%置信区间:41.3至248.9立方厘米)、107.3立方厘米(95%置信区间:18.7至232.8立方厘米)和1.1Gy(95%置信区间:0.3至2.2Gy)。FF和FFF治疗之间在剂量学结果和MU方面未发现统计学显著差异。从FF治疗到FFF,治疗时间平均缩短了2.31倍(95%置信区间:2.15至2.43),差异具有统计学意义。
用于肺癌SBRT的FFF VMAT与FF VMAT相比,对靶区和危及器官的剂量学结果相当,同时显著缩短了治疗时间。