• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

曼彻斯特手术后的宫颈癌:一项全国性队列研究。

Cervical cancer after the Manchester procedure: a nationwide cohort study.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Herlev and Gentofte University Hospital, DK-2730, Gentofte, Denmark.

Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Aug;34(8):1837-1842. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05481-w. Epub 2023 Feb 10.

DOI:10.1007/s00192-023-05481-w
PMID:36763147
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

The Manchester procedure is a successful operation to treat uterine prolapse. However, the influence on cervical cancer remains unknown. We hypothesized a lower risk of cervical cancer after the Manchester procedure.

METHODS

We included all Danish women undergoing the Manchester procedure during 1977-2018 (N = 23,935). Women undergoing anterior colporrhaphy (N = 51,008) were included as references due to comparable health-seeking behaviors. The study cohort is as previously described. We assessed the risk of cervical cancer mortality after the Manchester procedure versus anterior colporrhaphy using cumulated incidence plots and Cox hazard regressions. We applied Fisher's exact test to compare the distribution of histological subtypes after the operations.

RESULTS

Generally, few women were diagnosed with cervical cancer (0.1% after Manchester procedure and 0.2% after anterior colporrhaphy). After the Manchester procedure, the risk of cervical cancer was reduced (HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.39-0.94]). Furthermore, we found a slightly reduced risk of overall death (HR 0.96 [95% 0.94-0.99]), but no association regarding death due to cervical cancer (HR 0.66 [95% 0.34-1.25]). The distribution of histological subtypes was not changed.

CONCLUSIONS

Women undergoing the Manchester procedure are at lower risk of being diagnosed with cervical cancer, while the risk of cancer specific mortality is unchanged compared to women undergoing anterior colporrhaphy. Based on this study, we cannot recommend that women exit ordinary screening programs for human papillomavirus/cervical dysplasia after a Manchester procedure.

摘要

介绍与假说

曼彻斯特手术是一种成功的治疗子宫脱垂的手术。然而,其对宫颈癌的影响尚不清楚。我们假设曼彻斯特手术后宫颈癌的风险较低。

方法

我们纳入了 1977 年至 2018 年间所有接受曼彻斯特手术的丹麦女性(n=23935)。由于健康寻求行为相似,我们纳入了接受前阴道壁修补术(n=51008)的女性作为参照。该研究队列如前所述。我们使用累积发病率图和 Cox 风险回归评估曼彻斯特手术后与前阴道壁修补术相比宫颈癌死亡的风险。我们应用 Fisher 确切检验比较手术后组织学亚型的分布。

结果

一般来说,接受曼彻斯特手术后宫颈癌的诊断率较低(0.1%),接受前阴道壁修补术后为 0.2%。曼彻斯特手术后宫颈癌的风险降低(HR 0.60 [95% CI 0.39-0.94])。此外,我们发现总体死亡率略有降低(HR 0.96 [95% CI 0.94-0.99]),但宫颈癌相关死亡率无关联(HR 0.66 [95% CI 0.34-1.25])。组织学亚型的分布没有改变。

结论

接受曼彻斯特手术的女性被诊断为宫颈癌的风险较低,而与接受前阴道壁修补术的女性相比,宫颈癌特异性死亡率没有变化。基于这项研究,我们不能建议女性在接受曼彻斯特手术后退出人乳头瘤病毒/宫颈发育不良的常规筛查计划。

相似文献

1
Cervical cancer after the Manchester procedure: a nationwide cohort study.曼彻斯特手术后的宫颈癌:一项全国性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Aug;34(8):1837-1842. doi: 10.1007/s00192-023-05481-w. Epub 2023 Feb 10.
2
Manchester Operation: An Effective Treatment for Uterine Prolapse Caused by True Cervical Elongation.曼彻斯特手术:一种治疗真性宫颈延长导致的子宫脱垂的有效方法。
Yonsei Med J. 2019 Nov;60(11):1074-1080. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.11.1074.
3
Endometrial cancer after the Manchester procedure: a nationwide cohort study.曼彻斯特手术后的子宫内膜癌:一项全国性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1881-1888. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05196-4. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
4
Recurrent surgery in uterine prolapse: A nationwide register study.复发性子宫脱垂手术:一项全国性登记研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 May;101(5):532-541. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14340. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
5
Traction on the cervix in theatre before anterior repair: Does it tell us when to perform a concomitant hysterectomy?术前在手术室对宫颈行牵引:它能告诉我们何时行同期子宫切除术吗?
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2012 Feb;160(2):205-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.11.002. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
6
Cervical amputation versus vaginal hysterectomy: a population-based register study.宫颈切除术与经阴道子宫切除术:一项基于人群的登记研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Feb;28(2):257-266. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3119-0. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
7
The manchester-fothergill procedure as a fertility sparing alternative for pelvic organ prolapse in young women.曼彻斯特-福瑟吉尔手术作为年轻女性盆腔器官脱垂保留生育功能的替代方案。
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2006 Apr;19(2):89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2006.01.004.
8
Evaluation of suture material used in anterior colporrhaphy and the risk of recurrence.评价前阴道修补术中使用的缝合材料与复发风险的关系。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Oct;31(10):2011-2018. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04415-0. Epub 2020 Jul 7.
9
The Manchester operation - is it time for it to return to our surgical armamentarium in the twenty-first century?曼彻斯特手术——在 21 世纪,它是否应该重新成为我们外科手术器械库中的一员?
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jul;42(5):1419-1423. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1983785. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
10
Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques.原发性子宫脱垂的外科治疗:阴道自体组织手术技术的比较
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Nov;30(11):1887-1893. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03950-9. Epub 2019 May 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Endometrial cancer after the Manchester procedure: a nationwide cohort study.曼彻斯特手术后的子宫内膜癌:一项全国性队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Jul;33(7):1881-1888. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05196-4. Epub 2022 Apr 13.
2
Recurrent surgery in uterine prolapse: A nationwide register study.复发性子宫脱垂手术:一项全国性登记研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 May;101(5):532-541. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14340. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
3
The Danish health care system and epidemiological research: from health care contacts to database records.
丹麦医疗保健系统与流行病学研究:从医疗保健接触到数据库记录。
Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jul 12;11:563-591. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S179083. eCollection 2019.
4
Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques.原发性子宫脱垂的外科治疗:阴道自体组织手术技术的比较
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Nov;30(11):1887-1893. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03950-9. Epub 2019 May 3.
5
Trends in apical prolapse surgery between 2010 and 2016 in Denmark.2010 年至 2016 年丹麦顶端脱垂手术趋势。
Int Urogynecol J. 2020 Feb;31(2):321-327. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3852-7. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
6
Trends in prolapse surgery in England.英国脱垂手术的趋势。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Nov;29(11):1689-1695. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3731-2. Epub 2018 Aug 4.
7
Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: an activity-based costing analysis.曼彻斯特-福瑟吉尔手术与子宫骶骨韧带悬吊阴道子宫切除术:基于作业成本法的分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Aug;29(8):1161-1171. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3575-9. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
8
The Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched historical cohort study.曼彻斯特-福瑟吉尔手术与子宫骶骨韧带悬吊式阴道子宫切除术的比较:一项匹配历史队列研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Mar;29(3):431-440. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3519-9. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
9
Trends in Hysteropexy and Apical Support for Uterovaginal Prolapse in the United States from 2002 to 2012.2002年至2012年美国子宫阴道脱垂的子宫托治疗及顶端支持趋势
Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov/Dec;23(6):365-371. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000426.
10
Cervical amputation versus vaginal hysterectomy: a population-based register study.宫颈切除术与经阴道子宫切除术:一项基于人群的登记研究。
Int Urogynecol J. 2017 Feb;28(2):257-266. doi: 10.1007/s00192-016-3119-0. Epub 2016 Aug 16.