• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利妥昔单抗与硫唑嘌呤或霉酚酸酯治疗的天疱疮患者的感染风险:一项大规模全球队列研究。

Risk of infections in patients with pemphigus treated with rituximab vs. azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil: a large-scale global cohort study.

作者信息

Kridin Khalaf, Mruwat Noor, Amber Kyle T, Ludwig Ralf J

机构信息

Lübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Azrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Safed, Israel.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2023 Mar 30;188(4):499-505. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljac118.

DOI:10.1093/bjd/ljac118
PMID:36763798
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The risk of infectious complications among patients with pemphigus managed by rituximab is yet to be precisely elucidated.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the risk of infections in patients with pemphigus managed by rituximab vs. first-line corticosteroid-sparing agents [azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)].

METHODS

A global population-based cohort study compared patients with pemphigus initiating rituximab (n = 963) vs. azathioprine or MMF (n = 963) regarding the risk of 26 different infections. Propensity score matching was conducted to optimize comparability.

RESULTS

During the initial 12 months following treatment, patients under rituximab experienced elevated risk of COVID-19 [hazard ratio (HR) 1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-3.14; P = 0.028], parasitic diseases (HR 3.22, 95% CI 1.04-9.97; P = 0.032) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.04-2.58; P = 0.033). When evaluating infections developing ≥ 12 months after drug initiation, rituximab was associated with greater risk of pneumonia (HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.00-2.10; P = 0.047), COVID-19 (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.49-2.33; P < 0.001), osteomyelitis (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.11-5.31; P = 0.023), herpes simplex virus (HR 2.06, 95% CI 1.03-4.11; P = 0.037) and CMV (HR 1.63, 95% CI 1.07-2.49; P = 0.023) infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the first 12 months after treatment, patients under rituximab experience an elevated risk of COVID-19, parasitic and CMV infections. Rituximab is associated with pneumonia, osteomyelitis and viral diseases even beyond the first year after therapy. Pneumococcal vaccine and suppressive antiviral therapy should be considered even 1 year following therapy. There is no signal for elevated risk of tuberculosis, hepatitis B virus reactivation, Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.

摘要

背景

利妥昔单抗治疗的天疱疮患者发生感染并发症的风险尚未得到确切阐明。

目的

评估利妥昔单抗治疗的天疱疮患者与一线糖皮质激素节约剂(硫唑嘌呤和霉酚酸酯)相比的感染风险。

方法

一项基于全球人群的队列研究比较了开始使用利妥昔单抗的天疱疮患者(n = 963)与使用硫唑嘌呤或霉酚酸酯的患者(n = 963)发生26种不同感染的风险。进行倾向评分匹配以优化可比性。

结果

在治疗后的最初12个月内,接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者发生2019冠状病毒病的风险升高[风险比(HR)1.82,95%置信区间(CI)1.06 - 3.14;P = 0.028]、寄生虫病(HR 3.22,95% CI 1.04 - 9.97;P = 0.032)和巨细胞病毒(CMV)感染(HR 1.63,95% CI 1.04 - 2.58;P = 0.033)。在评估药物开始使用≥12个月后发生的感染时,利妥昔单抗与肺炎风险增加相关(HR 1.45,95% CI 1.00 - 2.10;P = 0.047)、2019冠状病毒病(HR 1.87,95% CI 1.49 - 2.33;P < 0.001)、骨髓炎(HR 2.42,95% CI 1.11 - 5.31;P = 0.023)、单纯疱疹病毒感染(HR 2.06,95% CI 1.03 - 4.11;P = 0.037)和CMV感染(HR 1.63,95% CI 1.07 - 2.49;P = 0.023)。

结论

在治疗后的前12个月内,接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者发生2019冠状病毒病、寄生虫和CMV感染的风险升高。即使在治疗后第一年之后,利妥昔单抗仍与肺炎、骨髓炎和病毒感染相关。即使在治疗1年后也应考虑接种肺炎球菌疫苗和进行抗病毒抑制治疗。未发现结核病、乙型肝炎病毒再激活、耶氏肺孢子菌肺炎和进行性多灶性白质脑病风险升高的迹象。

相似文献

1
Risk of infections in patients with pemphigus treated with rituximab vs. azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil: a large-scale global cohort study.利妥昔单抗与硫唑嘌呤或霉酚酸酯治疗的天疱疮患者的感染风险:一项大规模全球队列研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2023 Mar 30;188(4):499-505. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljac118.
2
Association of Rituximab With Risk of Long-term Cardiovascular and Metabolic Outcomes in Patients With Pemphigus.利妥昔单抗与天疱疮患者长期心血管和代谢结局风险的关联。
JAMA Dermatol. 2023 Jan 1;159(1):56-61. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.5182.
3
Treatment outcomes in a cohort of patients with mucosal-predominant pemphigus vulgaris.一组黏膜为主型寻常型天疱疮患者的治疗结果
Intern Med J. 2015 Mar;45(3):284-92. doi: 10.1111/imj.12674.
4
Evaluation of effect of empirical attack-preventive immunotherapies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: An update systematic review and meta -analysis.视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病经验性预防治疗效果评估:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neuroimmunol. 2022 Feb 15;363:577790. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2021.577790. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
5
Refractory pemphigus vulgaris treated with rituximab and mycophenolate mofetil.利妥昔单抗联合霉酚酸酯治疗难治性寻常型天疱疮
An Bras Dermatol. 2014 Nov-Dec;89(6):980-4. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143128.
6
[Therapy of pemphigus].[天疱疮的治疗]
Hautarzt. 2019 Apr;70(4):243-253. doi: 10.1007/s00105-019-4385-9.
7
Survival of Adjuvant Drugs for Treatment of Pemphigus: A Population-based Cohort Study.辅助药物治疗天疱疮的生存情况:基于人群的队列研究。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2021 Sep 3;101(9):adv00535. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3831.
8
Rituximab versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Patients with Pemphigus Vulgaris.寻常型天疱疮患者中利妥昔单抗与吗替麦考酚酯的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Jun 17;384(24):2295-2305. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2028564. Epub 2021 May 19.
9
Efficacy and safety of azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and reduced dose of rituximab in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder.吗替麦考酚酯和利妥昔单抗小剂量治疗视神经脊髓炎谱系疾病的疗效和安全性。
Eur J Neurol. 2022 Aug;29(8):2343-2354. doi: 10.1111/ene.15355. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
10
Does mycophenolate mofetil increase the incidence of cytomegalovirus disease compared with azathioprine after cadaveric kidney transplantation?与硫唑嘌呤相比,霉酚酸酯在尸体肾移植后是否会增加巨细胞病毒疾病的发病率?
Transplant Proc. 2005 Mar;37(2):850-1. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.228.

引用本文的文献

1
A Case Report of Pemphigus Vulgaris Initially Misdiagnosed as Tinea Capitis: Infectious Consequences of Diagnostic Delay in a Patient Treated With Rituximab.一例寻常型天疱疮初诊误诊为头癣的病例报告:利妥昔单抗治疗患者诊断延迟的感染后果
Cureus. 2025 Jul 10;17(7):e87662. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87662. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Dupilumab shows no elevated risk for maternal adverse pregnancy outcomes: A propensity-matched cohort study.度普利尤单抗未显示出孕产妇不良妊娠结局风险升高:一项倾向匹配队列研究。
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025 Sep;39(9):1576-1587. doi: 10.1111/jdv.20670. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
3
Nicotine dependence is associated with an increased risk of developing chronic, non-communicable inflammatory disease: a large-scale retrospective cohort study.
尼古丁依赖与患慢性非传染性炎症性疾病的风险增加有关:一项大规模回顾性队列研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Feb 12;16:1429297. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1429297. eCollection 2025.
4
Anti-TNF therapy impairs both short- and long-term IgG responses after repeated vaccination.抗TNF治疗会损害重复接种疫苗后的短期和长期IgG反应。
Allergy. 2025 Feb;80(2):423-439. doi: 10.1111/all.16241. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
5
Biologics Versus JAK Inhibitors. Part II: Risk of Infections. A Narrative Review.生物制剂与JAK抑制剂。第二部分:感染风险。一篇叙述性综述。
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Aug;14(8):1983-2038. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01203-2. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
6
Differential risks of psoriatic arthritis development in patients with varied psoriasis manifestations: a sex- and ethnicity-specific analysis.不同银屑病表现患者发生银屑病关节炎的差异风险:一项性别和种族特异性分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jun 21;11:1385491. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1385491. eCollection 2024.
7
Understanding patient perspectives on vaccine decision making in adults with autoimmune bullous diseases: a qualitative study.理解成人自身免疫性大疱性疾病患者对疫苗决策的看法:一项定性研究。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2024 Apr 18;316(5):125. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-02862-z.
8
Safety of Immunomodulatory Systemic Therapies Used in the Management of Immune-Related Cutaneous Adverse Events.用于治疗免疫相关皮肤不良事件的免疫调节全身疗法的安全性。
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023 Nov 15;16(11):1610. doi: 10.3390/ph16111610.
9
Editorial: Autoimmune blistering diseases: advances in the understanding of pathogenesis and new therapeutic horizons.社论:自身免疫性水疱病:发病机制认识的进展与新的治疗前景
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jul 12;10:1243878. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1243878. eCollection 2023.
10
Severe Pemphigus Vulgaris Resistant to Conventional Therapies and with Hypersensitivity to Rituximab in a 12-Year-Old Child.一名12岁儿童患严重寻常型天疱疮,对传统疗法耐药且对利妥昔单抗过敏
Children (Basel). 2023 May 24;10(6):920. doi: 10.3390/children10060920.