Suppr超能文献

在急性护理医院环境中识别认知障碍:寻找合适的筛查工具。

Identifying Cognitive Impairment in the Acute Care Hospital Setting: Finding an Appropriate Screening Tool.

机构信息

Kelly Casey, OTD, OTR/L, BCPR, ATP, CPAM, is Acute Care Therapy Services Team Leader, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD;

Erin Sim, OTD, OTR/L, PMP, is Acute Care Team Coordinator, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Am J Occup Ther. 2023 Jan 1;77(1). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2023.050028.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Identifying cognitive impairment in adults in acute care is essential so that providers can address functional deficits and plan for safe discharge. Occupational therapy practitioners play an essential role in screening for, evaluating, and treating cognitive impairment.

OBJECTIVE

To test and compare the psychometrics and feasibility of three cognitive screens and select the ideal screen for use in acute care.

DESIGN

Prospective mixed methods.

SETTING

Acute care hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty adults.

OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

We examined the interrater reliability, administration time, and usability of the Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool Short Form (BCAT-SF), the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care "6-Clicks" Applied Cognitive Inpatient Short Form (AM-PAC ACISF), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). We compared the construct validity, sensitivity, and specificity of the BCAT-SF and AM-PAC ACISF with those of the MoCA.

RESULTS

Interrater reliability was good to excellent; ICCs were .98 for the MoCA, .97 for the BCAT-SF, and .86 for the AM-PAC ACISF. The BCAT-SF and the AM-PAC ACISF both had 100% sensitivity, and specificity was 74% for the BCAT-SF and 98% for the AM-PAC ACISF. The optimal cutoff score for cognitive impairment on the AM-PAC ACISF was <22. Administration time of the AM-PAC ACISF (1.0 min) was significantly less than that of the BCAT-SF (5.0 min) and the MoCA (13.3 min; p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Each screen demonstrated acceptable reliability and construct validity. The AM-PAC ACISF had the optimum mix of performance and feasibility for the fast-paced acute care setting. What This Article Adds: Early identification of cognitive impairment using the AM-PAC ACISF can allow for timely occupational therapy intervention in acute care settings.

摘要

重要性

在急性护理中识别成年人的认知障碍至关重要,以便医疗服务提供者能够解决功能缺陷并计划安全出院。作业治疗师在认知障碍的筛查、评估和治疗中发挥着重要作用。

目的

测试和比较三种认知筛查工具的心理测量学和可行性,并选择理想的筛查工具用于急性护理。

设计

前瞻性混合方法。

设置

急性护理医院。

参与者

五十名成年人。

结果和措施

我们检查了简短认知评估工具短表(BCAT-SF)、急性后护理“6 点击”应用认知住院患者短表(AM-PAC ACISF)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)的评分者间信度、管理时间和可用性。我们比较了 BCAT-SF 和 AM-PAC ACISF 的结构有效性、敏感性和特异性与 MoCA 的结构有效性、敏感性和特异性。

结果

评分者间信度良好至优秀;MoCA 的 ICC 为.98,BCAT-SF 的 ICC 为.97,AM-PAC ACISF 的 ICC 为.86。BCAT-SF 和 AM-PAC ACISF 的敏感性均为 100%,BCAT-SF 的特异性为 74%,AM-PAC ACISF 的特异性为 98%。AM-PAC ACISF 认知障碍的最佳截断值为<22。AM-PAC ACISF 的管理时间(1.0 分钟)明显短于 BCAT-SF(5.0 分钟)和 MoCA(13.3 分钟;p<.001)。

结论和相关性

每种筛查工具都表现出可接受的可靠性和结构有效性。AM-PAC ACISF 在快节奏的急性护理环境中具有最佳的性能和可行性组合。本文的意义:使用 AM-PAC ACISF 早期识别认知障碍可以在急性护理环境中及时进行作业治疗干预。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验