Kelly Casey, OTD, OTR/L, BCPR, ATP, CPAM, is Acute Care Therapy Services Team Leader, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD;
Erin Sim, OTD, OTR/L, PMP, is Acute Care Team Coordinator, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD.
Am J Occup Ther. 2023 Jan 1;77(1). doi: 10.5014/ajot.2023.050028.
Identifying cognitive impairment in adults in acute care is essential so that providers can address functional deficits and plan for safe discharge. Occupational therapy practitioners play an essential role in screening for, evaluating, and treating cognitive impairment.
To test and compare the psychometrics and feasibility of three cognitive screens and select the ideal screen for use in acute care.
Prospective mixed methods.
Acute care hospital.
Fifty adults.
We examined the interrater reliability, administration time, and usability of the Brief Cognitive Assessment Tool Short Form (BCAT-SF), the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care "6-Clicks" Applied Cognitive Inpatient Short Form (AM-PAC ACISF), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). We compared the construct validity, sensitivity, and specificity of the BCAT-SF and AM-PAC ACISF with those of the MoCA.
Interrater reliability was good to excellent; ICCs were .98 for the MoCA, .97 for the BCAT-SF, and .86 for the AM-PAC ACISF. The BCAT-SF and the AM-PAC ACISF both had 100% sensitivity, and specificity was 74% for the BCAT-SF and 98% for the AM-PAC ACISF. The optimal cutoff score for cognitive impairment on the AM-PAC ACISF was <22. Administration time of the AM-PAC ACISF (1.0 min) was significantly less than that of the BCAT-SF (5.0 min) and the MoCA (13.3 min; p < .001).
Each screen demonstrated acceptable reliability and construct validity. The AM-PAC ACISF had the optimum mix of performance and feasibility for the fast-paced acute care setting. What This Article Adds: Early identification of cognitive impairment using the AM-PAC ACISF can allow for timely occupational therapy intervention in acute care settings.
在急性护理中识别成年人的认知障碍至关重要,以便医疗服务提供者能够解决功能缺陷并计划安全出院。作业治疗师在认知障碍的筛查、评估和治疗中发挥着重要作用。
测试和比较三种认知筛查工具的心理测量学和可行性,并选择理想的筛查工具用于急性护理。
前瞻性混合方法。
急性护理医院。
五十名成年人。
我们检查了简短认知评估工具短表(BCAT-SF)、急性后护理“6 点击”应用认知住院患者短表(AM-PAC ACISF)和蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)的评分者间信度、管理时间和可用性。我们比较了 BCAT-SF 和 AM-PAC ACISF 的结构有效性、敏感性和特异性与 MoCA 的结构有效性、敏感性和特异性。
评分者间信度良好至优秀;MoCA 的 ICC 为.98,BCAT-SF 的 ICC 为.97,AM-PAC ACISF 的 ICC 为.86。BCAT-SF 和 AM-PAC ACISF 的敏感性均为 100%,BCAT-SF 的特异性为 74%,AM-PAC ACISF 的特异性为 98%。AM-PAC ACISF 认知障碍的最佳截断值为<22。AM-PAC ACISF 的管理时间(1.0 分钟)明显短于 BCAT-SF(5.0 分钟)和 MoCA(13.3 分钟;p<.001)。
每种筛查工具都表现出可接受的可靠性和结构有效性。AM-PAC ACISF 在快节奏的急性护理环境中具有最佳的性能和可行性组合。本文的意义:使用 AM-PAC ACISF 早期识别认知障碍可以在急性护理环境中及时进行作业治疗干预。