Miki Kenji, Ikemoto Tatsunori, Hayashi Kazuhiro, Arai Young-Chang, Sekiguchi Miho, Shi Kenrin, Ushida Takahiro
Department of Pain Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan; Center for Pain Management, Hayaishi Hospital, Osaka, Japan; Clinical Research Group, Japanese Association for the Study of Musculoskeletal Pain, Japan.
Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan; Clinical Research Group, Japanese Association for the Study of Musculoskeletal Pain, Japan.
J Orthop Sci. 2018 May;23(3):483-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
Current worldwide clinical practice guidelines recommend acetaminophen as the first option for the treatment of acute low back pain. However, there is no concrete evidence regarding whether acetaminophen or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is more effective for treating acute low back pain (LBP) in Japan. The present study aimed to investigate whether acetaminophen treatment for acute musculoskeletal pain was comparable with loxoprofen (a traditional NSAID in Japan) treatment.
Of the 140 patients with acute LBP who visited out-patient hospitals, 127 were considered eligible and were randomly allocated to a group taking acetaminophen or one taking loxoprofen. As primary outcome measure, pain intensity was measured using a 0-10-numeric rating scale (NRS). Moreover, pain disability, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, depression, and quality of life, as well as adverse events, were assessed as secondary outcomes. The primary outcome was tested with a noninferiority margin (0.84 on changes in pain-NRS), and the secondary outcomes were compared using conventional statistical methods at week 2 and week 4.
Seventy patients completed the study (acetaminophen: 35, loxoprofen: 35). The dropout rates showed no significant difference between the two medication-groups. We found that the mean differences of changes in pain-NRS from baseline to week 2 or 4 between the two medication groups were not statistically beyond the noninferiority margin (mean [95% confidence interval]: -0.51 [-1.70, 0.67], at week 2 and -0.80 [-2.08, 0.48] at week 4). There were no consistent differences between the two medication groups in terms of secondary outcomes.
The results suggest that acetaminophen has comparable analgesic effects on acute LBP, based on at least a noninferiority margin, compared with loxoprofen at 4 weeks. Acetaminophen seems to be a reasonable first-line option for patients with acute LBP in Japan.
目前全球临床实践指南推荐对乙酰氨基酚作为治疗急性下腰痛的首选药物。然而,在日本,对于对乙酰氨基酚或非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)治疗急性下腰痛(LBP)哪种更有效,尚无确凿证据。本研究旨在调查对乙酰氨基酚治疗急性肌肉骨骼疼痛是否与洛索洛芬(日本一种传统的NSAID)治疗效果相当。
在140名到门诊医院就诊的急性LBP患者中,127名被认为符合条件,并被随机分配到服用对乙酰氨基酚组或服用洛索洛芬组。作为主要结局指标,使用0至10数字评分量表(NRS)测量疼痛强度。此外,将疼痛残疾、疼痛灾难化、焦虑、抑郁和生活质量以及不良事件作为次要结局进行评估。主要结局采用非劣效界值(疼痛NRS变化值为0.84)进行检验,次要结局在第2周和第4周使用传统统计方法进行比较。
70名患者完成了研究(对乙酰氨基酚组:35名,洛索洛芬组:35名)。两个药物组的脱落率无显著差异。我们发现,两个药物组从基线到第2周或第4周疼痛NRS变化的平均差异在统计学上未超出非劣效界值(均值[95%置信区间]:第2周时为-0.51[-1.70, 0.67],第4周时为-0.80[-2.08, 0.48])。两个药物组在次要结局方面没有一致的差异。
结果表明,与洛索洛芬相比,对乙酰氨基酚在4周时对急性LBP至少具有非劣效的镇痛效果。对乙酰氨基酚似乎是日本急性LBP患者合理的一线选择。