Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Oberdürrbacher Straße 6, 97080 Würzburg, Germany.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Acad Radiol. 2023 Sep;30(9):1773-1783. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.01.014. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
In breast MRI with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), fat suppression is essential for eliminating the dominant lipid signal. This investigation evaluates a combined water-excitation-spectral-fatsat method (WEXfs) versus standard spectral attenuated inversion recovery (SPAIR) in high-resolution 3-Tesla breast MRI.
Multiparametric breast MRI with 2 echo-planar DWI sequences was performed in 83 patients (50.1 ± 12.6 years) employing either WEXfs or SPAIR for fat signal suppression. Three radiologists assessed overall DWI quality and delineability of 88 focal lesions (28 malignant, 60 benign) on images with b values of 800 and 1600 s/mm, as well as apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. For each fat suppression method and b value, the longest lesion diameter was determined in addition to measuring the signal intensity in DWI and ADC value in standardized regions of interest.
Regardless of b values, image quality (all p < 0.001) and lesion delineability (all p ≤ 0.003) with WEXfs-DWI were deemed superior compared to SPAIR-DWI in benign and malignant lesions. Irrespective of lesion characterization, WEXfs-DWI provided superior signal-to-noise, contrast-to-noise and signal-intensity ratios with 1600 s/mm (all p ≤ 0.05). The lesion size difference between contrast-enhanced T1 subtraction images and DWI was smaller for WEXfs compared to SPAIR fat suppression (all p ≤ 0.007). The mean ADC value in malignant lesions was lower for WEXfs-DWI (p < 0.001), while no significant ADC difference was ascertained between both techniques in benign lesions (p = 0.947).
WEXfs-DWI provides better subjective and objective image quality than standard SPAIR-DWI, resulting in a more accurate estimation of benign and malignant lesion size.
在具有扩散加权成像(DWI)的乳腺 MRI 中,脂肪抑制对于消除主导脂质信号至关重要。本研究旨在评估高分辨率 3.0T 乳腺 MRI 中联合水激发频谱脂肪饱和(WEXfs)与标准频谱衰减反转恢复(SPAIR)技术在脂肪抑制方面的效果。
83 例患者(年龄 50.1 ± 12.6 岁)接受了多参数乳腺 MRI 检查,其中 2 例行 EPI-DWI 序列,分别采用 WEXfs 或 SPAIR 进行脂肪信号抑制。3 位放射科医生评估了两种脂肪抑制方法(WEXfs 和 SPAIR)在 b 值为 800 和 1600 s/mm²的图像上的整体 DWI 质量和 88 个局灶性病变(28 个恶性,60 个良性)的可描绘性,同时评估了表观扩散系数(ADC)图。对于每种脂肪抑制方法和 b 值,均测量了最长病变直径,并在标准化 ROI 中测量了 DWI 信号强度和 ADC 值。
无论 b 值如何,WEXfs-DWI 的图像质量(均 P < 0.001)和病变可描绘性(均 P ≤ 0.003)均优于 SPAIR-DWI 在良性和恶性病变中的效果。无论病变特征如何,WEXfs-DWI 在 1600 s/mm²时均提供了更好的信噪比、对比噪声比和信号强度比(均 P ≤ 0.05)。与 SPAIR 脂肪抑制相比,WEXfs 下增强 T1 减影图像与 DWI 之间的病变大小差异更小(均 P ≤ 0.007)。WEXfs-DWI 下恶性病变的 ADC 值较低(P < 0.001),而两种技术在良性病变中的 ADC 值无显著差异(P = 0.947)。
与标准 SPAIR-DWI 相比,WEXfs-DWI 提供了更好的主观和客观图像质量,从而更准确地估计了良性和恶性病变的大小。